Missouri Georgia fumble

[CraigKressel]

That was a big ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME moment. How in the FUCK did they not reverse that call after the timeout????

[FSUKW]

Which fumble? The one by the WR of Missouri.

If so, that was totally a fumble. What basis would you have to reverse?

[CraigKressel]

Which fumble? The one by the WR of Missouri.

If so, that was totally a fumble. What basis would you have to reverse?

Do you not know the fucking rules, even the announcer said what everyone in the god damn stadium was thinking.

Forward progress stopped for a long ass time, they carried the guy backwards 2 yards then stripped it. He was down. Forward progress cant stop for 5 seconds and then fumble.

[FSUKW]

Which fumble? The one by the WR of Missouri.

If so, that was totally a fumble. What basis would you have to reverse?

Do you not know the fucking rules, even the announcer said what everyone in the god damn stadium was thinking.

Forward progress stopped for a long ass time, they carried the guy backwards 2 yards then stripped it. He was down. Forward progress cant stop for 5 seconds and then fumble.

I never heard a whistle. It wasn't reviewed. Forward progress wasn't stopped for 5 seconds. The entire play didn't take 5 seconds.

Maybe are talking about different fumbles.

[FlatEarth]

It's not a reviewable play. Was it borderline? Sure. But the call on the field is what it is. These refs are just doing what they are told.

Don't blame them... Blame the weak suck Mizzou player for not hitting the weights

[CraigKressel]

It's not a reviewable play. Was it borderline? Sure. But the call on the field is what it is. These refs are just doing what they are told.

Don't blame them... Blame the weak suck Mizzou player for not hitting the weights

It is reviewable because review can determine if a runner is down or not. They review forward progress on spots for 1st down conversions, etc its the same damn thing.

[FSUKW]

How is a fumble not a reviewable play?

[CraigKressel]

Which fumble? The one by the WR of Missouri.

If so, that was totally a fumble. What basis would you have to reverse?

Do you not know the fucking rules, even the announcer said what everyone in the god damn stadium was thinking.

Forward progress stopped for a long ass time, they carried the guy backwards 2 yards then stripped it. He was down. Forward progress cant stop for 5 seconds and then fumble.

I never heard a whistle. It wasn't reviewed. Forward progress wasn't stopped for 5 seconds. The entire play didn't take 5 seconds.

Maybe are talking about different fumbles.

Yea you never heard the whistle cause the refs suck ass for not stopping the play. You can go back and reverse that though how many times have you seen a picked up fumble get returned because they ruled the runner down on a review? Was there a whistle on any of those plays?

[JimTrenzel]

The play wasn't reviewable. The refs should've blown the whistle, just like BOTH ANNOUNCERS said.

[CraigKressel]

Why did Brian Griese agree with me and why did the coach try to challenge it? I guess that you guys know more than both of them.

[FlatEarth]

It's not a reviewable play. Was it borderline? Sure. But the call on the field is what it is. These refs are just doing what they are told.

Don't blame them... Blame the weak suck Mizzou player for not hitting the weights

It is reviewable because review can determine if a runner is down or not. They review forward progress on spots for 1st down conversions, etc its the same damn thing.

We're talking about different plays then. This guy wasn't even close to being down. His forward progress might have been stopped, but we'll never know because it's not a reviewable play. :dunno

[FSUKW]

Right after the play.

"Missouri has called for a time out. Give some people time to look at things, if they want to" verbatim from the announcer.

I did just rewind it. From the time he makes the catch to the time it is fumbled is less than 3 seconds. After re-watching it, I agree it was questionable, but more borderline like 20 said. It was not questionable enough to throw a tantrum over and I hate UGA.

[FlatEarth]

Curious why you're so bitter about it anyway? Ohio State will not make the playoffs, so you don't have to worry about playing this team.

[FlatEarth]

Right after the play.

"Missouri has called for a time out. Give some people time to look at things, if they want to" verbatim from the announcer.

I did just rewind it. From the time he makes the catch to the time it is fumbled is less than 3 seconds. After re-watching it, I agree it was questionable, but more borderline like 20 said. It was not questionable enough to throw a tantrum over and I hate UGA.

The fuck? You okay, dude?? :shock:

[FSUKW]

Right after the play.

"Missouri has called for a time out. Give some people time to look at things, if they want to" verbatim from the announcer.

I did just rewind it. From the time he makes the catch to the time it is fumbled is less than 3 seconds. After re-watching it, I agree it was questionable, but more borderline like 20 said. It was not questionable enough to throw a tantrum over and I hate UGA.

The fuck? You okay, dude?? :shock:

I know..... :facepalm

[FSUKW]

I wonder who Vince Dooley is rooting for here.

[CraigKressel]

Curious why you're so bitter about it anyway? Ohio State will not make the playoffs, so you don't have to worry about playing this team.

Yea cause this Georgia team just looks like a lock for the playoff... They only have a great chance at making it because the schedule is utter trash.

[FlatEarth]

I wonder who Vince Dooley is rooting for here.

Georgia (per Atlanta Radio)

[FlatEarth]

Curious why you're so bitter about it anyway? Ohio State will not make the playoffs, so you don't have to worry about playing this team.

Yea cause this Georgia team just looks like a lock for the playoff... They only have a great chance at making it because the schedule is utter trash.

Thanks for proving my point for me

[CraigKressel]

Weird after looking at the rules for replay this scenario does not seem covered so I am now unsure if it can be reviewed or not. It talks about forward progress and fumbles but not determining if a runner is down by forward progress or not in replay. I would lean towards being able to review that because the rules do not say that you cannot and it lets you change the spot based on forward progress also it lets you reverse fumbles if the runner is down.

http://www.oficiales.org/1_reglas_NCAA/ ... REPLAY.pdf