Moderator: JdPat04




CraigKressel wrote:What I want to know is how they did not fall from 2nd after a close game with an unranked team that quite frankly if the refs didn't fuck up they would have lost.
Their schedule sucks and they have not looked good so far, if this was Ohio State starting 2nd they would be ranked 5th by now.


CraigKressel wrote:What I want to know is how they did not fall from 2nd after a close game with an unranked team that quite frankly if the refs didn't fuck up they would have lost.
Their schedule sucks and they have not looked good so far, if this was Ohio State starting 2nd they would be ranked 5th by now.

FSUKW wrote:You tell me:
CLEMSON
2018 opponents with 2017 losing record = 3
2018 opponents with 2017 winning record = 9
OOC: USC, A&M, Furman, Georgia Southern - 1 team with losing record last year - one FCS team
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... ing-roads/
GEORGIA
2018 opponents with 2017 losing record = 5
2018 opponents with 2017 winning record = 7
OOC: Austin Peay, Middle Tennessee, UMASS, GT - 2 OOC teams with losing record last year - one FCS team
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... hallenges/
OHIO STATE
2018 opponents with 2017 losing record = 7
2018 opponents with 2017 winning record = 5
OOC: Oregon State, TCU, Tulane, Maryland (likely scheduled prior to entry into BIG 10)- 3 OOC teams with losing record last year - no FCS teams
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... vely-easy/
Rank them hardest to easiest:
1) Ohio State
2) Clemson
3) UGA
Ohio State - 7 teams that had losing records last year. OOC includes one good team - TCU. Don't really care how you classify Maryland conference they suck and had losing record last year. Rest of OOC sucks even if no FCS. You are basically hanging hat on PSU, Michigan, Michigan State, TCU
Clemson - Face 3 teams with a losing record last year. Their OOC includes 2 SEC schools (Big deal except that those 2 had winning records last year).
UGA - 1). SEC EAST 2) Austin Peay, Midd Tennessee, UMASS, GT - (losing record last year) Your East schedule hurt you. I am not sold on LSU as a tough ass team but let's see. You should roll into Atlanta undefeated. Auburn is major difference maker.
JMO

FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:What I want to know is how they did not fall from 2nd after a close game with an unranked team that quite frankly if the refs didn't fuck up they would have lost.
Their schedule sucks and they have not looked good so far, if this was Ohio State starting 2nd they would be ranked 5th by now.
Why is Miami, Michigan State, Michigan and USC ranked but not A&M? A&M blew out their cupcake just like everyone else did?
I hate Jimbo but I'd day A&M > Michigan State and = USC
Perspective, it's whatever fits your argument.

CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:You tell me:
CLEMSON
2018 opponents with 2017 losing record = 3
2018 opponents with 2017 winning record = 9
OOC: USC, A&M, Furman, Georgia Southern - 1 team with losing record last year - one FCS team
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... ing-roads/
GEORGIA
2018 opponents with 2017 losing record = 5
2018 opponents with 2017 winning record = 7
OOC: Austin Peay, Middle Tennessee, UMASS, GT - 2 OOC teams with losing record last year - one FCS team
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... hallenges/
OHIO STATE
2018 opponents with 2017 losing record = 7
2018 opponents with 2017 winning record = 5
OOC: Oregon State, TCU, Tulane, Maryland (likely scheduled prior to entry into BIG 10)- 3 OOC teams with losing record last year - no FCS teams
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... vely-easy/
Rank them hardest to easiest:
1) Ohio State
2) Clemson
3) UGA
Ohio State - 7 teams that had losing records last year. OOC includes one good team - TCU. Don't really care how you classify Maryland conference they suck and had losing record last year. Rest of OOC sucks even if no FCS. You are basically hanging hat on PSU, Michigan, Michigan State, TCU
Clemson - Face 3 teams with a losing record last year. Their OOC includes 2 SEC schools (Big deal except that those 2 had winning records last year).
UGA - 1). SEC EAST 2) Austin Peay, Midd Tennessee, UMASS, GT - (losing record last year) Your East schedule hurt you. I am not sold on LSU as a tough ass team but let's see. You should roll into Atlanta undefeated. Auburn is major difference maker.
JMO
When is losing and winning record the bar for how tough a schedule is? Of course you are going to have more teams with a winning record when everyone you play is mediocre and none of them give a bunch of your conference opponents a bunch of losses. Also why are you counting Furman in that, like Rutgers, Oregon State and teams like that wouldn't have a winning record playing Furman's schedule?
They play 0 top 25 teams if you are a playoff contender you should be able to easily beat most unranked teams.

CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:What I want to know is how they did not fall from 2nd after a close game with an unranked team that quite frankly if the refs didn't fuck up they would have lost.
Their schedule sucks and they have not looked good so far, if this was Ohio State starting 2nd they would be ranked 5th by now.
Why is Miami, Michigan State, Michigan and USC ranked but not A&M? A&M blew out their cupcake just like everyone else did?
I hate Jimbo but I'd day A&M > Michigan State and = USC
Perspective, it's whatever fits your argument.
Because they had a much better year last year than Texas AM, sure Texas AM could be better but we don't have much to go by other than last year.

FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:What I want to know is how they did not fall from 2nd after a close game with an unranked team that quite frankly if the refs didn't fuck up they would have lost.
Their schedule sucks and they have not looked good so far, if this was Ohio State starting 2nd they would be ranked 5th by now.
Why is Miami, Michigan State, Michigan and USC ranked but not A&M? A&M blew out their cupcake just like everyone else did?
I hate Jimbo but I'd day A&M > Michigan State and = USC
Perspective, it's whatever fits your argument.
Because they had a much better year last year than Texas AM, sure Texas AM could be better but we don't have much to go by other than last year.
That's entirely your perspective.
Michigan lost to South Carolina
A&M beat South Carolina
They are both 1-1 but one is ranked. I don't care, just making a point.
:ROFL2

CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:What I want to know is how they did not fall from 2nd after a close game with an unranked team that quite frankly if the refs didn't fuck up they would have lost.
Their schedule sucks and they have not looked good so far, if this was Ohio State starting 2nd they would be ranked 5th by now.
Why is Miami, Michigan State, Michigan and USC ranked but not A&M? A&M blew out their cupcake just like everyone else did?
I hate Jimbo but I'd day A&M > Michigan State and = USC
Perspective, it's whatever fits your argument.
Because they had a much better year last year than Texas AM, sure Texas AM could be better but we don't have much to go by other than last year.
That's entirely your perspective.
Michigan lost to South Carolina
A&M beat South Carolina
They are both 1-1 but one is ranked. I don't care, just making a point.
:ROFL2
1 returned 20 starters and added a 5 star experienced QB and the other got a completely new coaching staff.

CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:What I want to know is how they did not fall from 2nd after a close game with an unranked team that quite frankly if the refs didn't fuck up they would have lost.
Their schedule sucks and they have not looked good so far, if this was Ohio State starting 2nd they would be ranked 5th by now.
Why is Miami, Michigan State, Michigan and USC ranked but not A&M? A&M blew out their cupcake just like everyone else did?
I hate Jimbo but I'd day A&M > Michigan State and = USC
Perspective, it's whatever fits your argument.
Because they had a much better year last year than Texas AM, sure Texas AM could be better but we don't have much to go by other than last year.
That's entirely your perspective.
Michigan lost to South Carolina
A&M beat South Carolina
They are both 1-1 but one is ranked. I don't care, just making a point.
:ROFL2
1 returned 20 starters and added a 5 star experienced QB and the other got a completely new coaching staff.


FSUKW wrote:A&M>Ball State>Michigan>Michigan State
Perspective!!!!
and fuck Jimbo!!!!

CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:A&M>Ball State>Michigan>Michigan State
Perspective!!!!
and fuck Jimbo!!!!
I have no problem with Michigan being unranked and they should be for now. So should Texas AM though.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests