![]() |
| FAQ |
| Board index » General » General Discussion |
| Moderator: JdPat04 |
| Previous topic | Next topic Page 1 of 1 [ 19 posts ] |
| Post new topic | Post a reply |
| Print view |
| ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|---|
| ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 4:44 pm |
|
complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call
|
| Last post |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 6:50 pm |
|
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call :facepalm |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 6:54 pm |
|
RjunCajun wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call :facepalm this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 6:56 pm |
|
The hit is awesome to watch. His whole body moves while his head stays in place on initial impact. :lol:
|
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 7:00 pm |
|
what was the reason for the flag? cuz I saw none
|
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 7:17 pm |
|
The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes
|
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm |
|
what was the "penalty"?
|
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm |
|
so far this year unnecessary roughness calls are up 34% from last year and 59% from 2009
They are going to start calling "excessive force" for hits on QBs and WRs :biglol |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 7:45 pm |
|
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote RjunCajun wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call :facepalm this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit :word |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 8:19 pm |
|
RjunCajun wrote The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 8:20 pm |
|
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought
|
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 8:25 pm |
|
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote RjunCajun wrote The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty. I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control. |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 8:26 pm |
|
Winston4Heisman wrote MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought i never said the tuck rule was legit bro i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now i was giving you a hard time you nerd |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 8:28 pm |
|
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought i never said the tuck rule was legit bro i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now i was giving you a hard time you nerd Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 8:34 pm |
|
Winston4Heisman wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought i never said the tuck rule was legit bro i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now i was giving you a hard time you nerd Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 20th, 2013, 8:39 pm |
|
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought i never said the tuck rule was legit bro i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now i was giving you a hard time you nerd Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game Weren't they the underdog back then? |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 21st, 2013, 12:17 am |
|
EricBerry14 wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought i never said the tuck rule was legit bro i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now i was giving you a hard time you nerd Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game Weren't they the underdog back then? No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 21st, 2013, 12:43 am |
|
RjunCajun wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote RjunCajun wrote The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty. I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control. That was mortenson and he said that on sportscenter too. But what a fag call. I though it was just the refs wanting to march with the aints, but the nfl fined him too :wtf |
| Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees |
|
|
| November 21st, 2013, 1:23 am |
|
Winston4Heisman wrote EricBerry14 wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MIAMIDOMINATION wrote Winston4Heisman wrote MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought i never said the tuck rule was legit bro i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now i was giving you a hard time you nerd Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game Weren't they the underdog back then? No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow Without their starting qb? |
| Top |
| Post new topic | Post a reply |
|
Page 1 of 1 [ 19 posts ] Previous topic | Next topic |
Users browsing this forum: Aaronmyday and 126 guests |
| Board index » General » General Discussion |
|
STG-Mobile Style © 2008 STG Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group phpBB-Mobile © 2008 STG |