FAQ


Previous topic | Next topic
Page 1 of 1 [ 19 posts ]
Post new topic Post a reply
Print view

ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 4:44 pm Post
complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call
Last post


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 6:50 pm Post
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 6:54 pm Post
RjunCajun wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm

this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 6:56 pm Post
The hit is awesome to watch. His whole body moves while his head stays in place on initial impact. :lol:


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Site Admin
Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 7:00 pm Post
what was the reason for the flag? cuz I saw none


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 7:17 pm Post
The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Site Admin
Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm Post
what was the "penalty"?


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Site Admin
Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm Post
so far this year unnecessary roughness calls are up 34% from last year and 59% from 2009

They are going to start calling "excessive force" for hits on QBs and WRs :biglol


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 7:45 pm Post
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
RjunCajun wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm

this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit


:word


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 8:19 pm Post
RjunCajun wrote
The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 8:20 pm Post
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 8:25 pm Post
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
RjunCajun wrote
The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him



I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty.

I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control.


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 8:26 pm Post
Winston4Heisman wrote
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 8:28 pm Post
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 8:34 pm Post
Winston4Heisman wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Site Admin
Profile 
November 20th, 2013, 8:39 pm Post
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 21st, 2013, 12:17 am Post
EricBerry14 wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?

No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Profile 
November 21st, 2013, 12:43 am Post
RjunCajun wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
RjunCajun wrote
The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him



I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty.

I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control.

That was mortenson and he said that on sportscenter too. But what a fag call. I though it was just the refs wanting to march with the aints, but the nfl fined him too :wtf


Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Offline - Site Admin
Profile 
November 21st, 2013, 1:23 am Post
Winston4Heisman wrote
EricBerry14 wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote
Winston4Heisman wrote
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?

No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow

Without their starting qb?
Top

Post new topic  Post a reply

Page 1 of 1 [ 19 posts ]
Previous topic | Next topic

Users browsing this forum: Aaronmyday and 112 guests










Jump to