|
| FAQ |
| Board index » College Sports » College Football |
| Moderator: JdPat04 |
| Previous topic | Next topic Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] |
| Post new topic | Post a reply |
| Print view |
| Indiana lost by less than ugay |
|---|
| Indiana lost by less than ugay |
 CraigKressel - 
|
January 3rd, 2025, 12:46 am  |
|
Interesting
|
| Last post |
| Re: Indiana lost by less than ugay |
|
bigbluebazooka -
|
| January 3rd, 2025, 11:18 am |
|
I guess Bama and UGay are no longer dominating college football now that other schools can legally pay players now. :thought
|
| Re: Indiana lost by less than ugay |
|
CraigKressel -
|
| January 3rd, 2025, 2:31 pm |
|
That and they have to earn it on the field with more than 1 or 2 games.
|
| Re: Indiana lost by less than ugay |
|
JdPat04 -
|
| January 3rd, 2025, 4:06 pm |
|
True, but we don’t use a>b>c because it’s not accurate
|
| Re: Indiana lost by less than ugay |
|
Muck FcDisney -
|
| January 3rd, 2025, 5:51 pm |
|
JdPat04 wrote True, but we don’t use a>b>c because it’s not accurate This is not a > b > c. It's a > b is greater than a > c, so c > b... and both are not always accurate. |
| Re: Indiana lost by less than ugay |
|
CraigKressel -
|
| January 3rd, 2025, 7:48 pm |
|
JdPat04 wrote True, but we don’t use a>b>c because it’s not accurate Indiana looked better than Georgia all year Michigan is better than Alabama we saw that on the field Ohio State is better than everyone in the SEC you had 6-6 and 7-5 Big 10 teams beating upper middle SEC teams so why wouldn't I assume that was the case for some of Indiana's opponents over Georgia's Illinois was better than all the 3 loss SEC chumps. |
| Top |
| Post new topic | Post a reply |
|
Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] Previous topic | Next topic |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests |
| Board index » College Sports » College Football |
|
STG-Mobile Style © 2008 STG Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group phpBB-Mobile © 2008 STG |