Moderator: JdPat04
Muck FcDisney wrote:It is DEMOCRATS who want to shut down places that provide FREE* diapers, formula, clothes, cribs, car seats, toys, bill assistance, healthcare assistance to POOR, pregnant WOMEN.
*via charity, not taxpayer money or inflation-causing money printing
They want as many abortions as possible, and are going all out to make poor women suffer to get their way.
Never forget.
The Prestonwood counselor told her, falsely, that she could carry an ectopic pregnancy (a very dangerous situation to both mother and potential child) to term if she was "careful," and urged her to delay a decision to terminate the pregnancy. "I said, 'OK, so you want me to wait until it becomes illegal for me to get an abortion?'"
"They scanned my ID. They know where I live, they know my name, they have my f-cking license number. It felt like a completely different violation."
The national anti-abortion organizations that run the largest networks of pregnancy centers say they protect their clients' privacy. "That data is secure," Heartbeat International spokeswoman Andrea Trudden tells TIME.
Texas' six-week abortion ban offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who wins a civil case against either an abortion provider or someone who aided in an abortion. Oklahoma also offers $10,000 in its sweeping abortion ban, which went into effect in May.
By offering a substantial monetary reward, the Texas, Oklahoma, and Idaho laws, and the National Right to Life model bill, potentially create a powerful motivation for anyone who has access to pregnancy-center databases. "The data," says Peterson of Gender Justice, "literally has a price tag on it."
Close to 20% of pregnancy centers nationwide now receive public funding (Up to $8M/yr in 12 states, $50,000,000/yr in TX. Nice call on that no taxpayer money, Muck. :dog).
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:It is DEMOCRATS who want to shut down places that provide FREE* diapers, formula, clothes, cribs, car seats, toys, bill assistance, healthcare assistance to POOR, pregnant WOMEN.
*via charity, not taxpayer money or inflation-causing money printing
They want as many abortions as possible, and are going all out to make poor women suffer to get their way.
Never forget.
I'm not sure if you're baiting because this is a laughably bad take, even for reds. These places are just pro-baby cults. There's more honesty in the Davidians' beliefs than what you posted. You really think forcing unwanted kids is a good thing? :crazy And that's not all:The Prestonwood counselor told her, falsely, that she could carry an ectopic pregnancy (a very dangerous situation to both mother and potential child) to term if she was "careful," and urged her to delay a decision to terminate the pregnancy. "I said, 'OK, so you want me to wait until it becomes illegal for me to get an abortion?'"
"They scanned my ID. They know where I live, they know my name, they have my f-cking license number. It felt like a completely different violation."
The national anti-abortion organizations that run the largest networks of pregnancy centers say they protect their clients' privacy. "That data is secure," Heartbeat International spokeswoman Andrea Trudden tells TIME.
Texas' six-week abortion ban offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who wins a civil case against either an abortion provider or someone who aided in an abortion. Oklahoma also offers $10,000 in its sweeping abortion ban, which went into effect in May.
By offering a substantial monetary reward, the Texas, Oklahoma, and Idaho laws, and the National Right to Life model bill, potentially create a powerful motivation for anyone who has access to pregnancy-center databases. "The data," says Peterson of Gender Justice, "literally has a price tag on it."
Close to 20% of pregnancy centers nationwide now receive public funding (Up to $8M/yr in 12 states, $50,000,000/yr in TX. Nice call on that no taxpayer money, Muck. :dog).
Source: https://time.com/6189528/anti-abortion- ... stigation/ (the link in the tweet)
"The data is secure. You can trust me: I'm a spokesperson." We all know that nobody would sell people's private data, especially not for a $10,000 bounty.
:ays , Muck? Never forget, indeed.
Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:It is DEMOCRATS who want to shut down places that provide FREE* diapers, formula, clothes, cribs, car seats, toys, bill assistance, healthcare assistance to POOR, pregnant WOMEN.
*via charity, not taxpayer money or inflation-causing money printing
They want as many abortions as possible, and are going all out to make poor women suffer to get their way.
Never forget.
I'm not sure if you're baiting because this is a laughably bad take, even for reds. These places are just pro-baby cults. There's more honesty in the Davidians' beliefs than what you posted. You really think forcing unwanted kids is a good thing? :crazy And that's not all:The Prestonwood counselor told her, falsely, that she could carry an ectopic pregnancy (a very dangerous situation to both mother and potential child) to term if she was "careful," and urged her to delay a decision to terminate the pregnancy. "I said, 'OK, so you want me to wait until it becomes illegal for me to get an abortion?'"
"They scanned my ID. They know where I live, they know my name, they have my f-cking license number. It felt like a completely different violation."
The national anti-abortion organizations that run the largest networks of pregnancy centers say they protect their clients' privacy. "That data is secure," Heartbeat International spokeswoman Andrea Trudden tells TIME.
Texas' six-week abortion ban offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who wins a civil case against either an abortion provider or someone who aided in an abortion. Oklahoma also offers $10,000 in its sweeping abortion ban, which went into effect in May.
By offering a substantial monetary reward, the Texas, Oklahoma, and Idaho laws, and the National Right to Life model bill, potentially create a powerful motivation for anyone who has access to pregnancy-center databases. "The data," says Peterson of Gender Justice, "literally has a price tag on it."
Close to 20% of pregnancy centers nationwide now receive public funding (Up to $8M/yr in 12 states, $50,000,000/yr in TX. Nice call on that no taxpayer money, Muck. :dog).
Source: https://time.com/6189528/anti-abortion- ... stigation/ (the link in the tweet)
"The data is secure. You can trust me: I'm a spokesperson." We all know that nobody would sell people's private data, especially not for a $10,000 bounty.
:ays , Muck? Never forget, indeed.
Anecdote of someone who *gasp* had to present ID and a theory about something that could happen, but never has. Yes, never forget the thing that never even happened. :facepalm
She was high risk for an ectopic pregnancy, but obviously didn't have one, or the leftist pro-mutilators certainly would have mentioned it. Another baby needlessly killed. Good job!
You are partially correct regarding funding. 14% are funded. 86 percent of pregnancy centers receive no public funding whatsoever. Those that do receive public funding are required to use it for services such as sexual risk avoidance education — with 1.1 million students attending these presentations — and STD testing and treatment.
While showing your ID can certainly be a traumatizing experience, I'd guess that most people would find these worse:Spoiler:Spoiler:Spoiler:Spoiler:Spoiler:
CPCs receive a few million here and there from states, but Planned Parenthood is a $1-plus billion business that rakes in one-third of its budget from government grants and contracts at both the state and federal levels.
All Churchy groups are a little cultish for my tastes, but if I had to choose I'd take the cult of saving babies over the cult of killing babies.
Kinda weird that you use a bunch of innocent children mercilessly slaughtered by federal funded agencies as a means of attacking me. And CPCs obviously can't force anyone to do anything.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:It is DEMOCRATS who want to shut down places that provide FREE* diapers, formula, clothes, cribs, car seats, toys, bill assistance, healthcare assistance to POOR, pregnant WOMEN.
*via charity, not taxpayer money or inflation-causing money printing
They want as many abortions as possible, and are going all out to make poor women suffer to get their way.
Never forget.
I'm not sure if you're baiting because this is a laughably bad take, even for reds. These places are just pro-baby cults. There's more honesty in the Davidians' beliefs than what you posted. You really think forcing unwanted kids is a good thing? :crazy And that's not all:The Prestonwood counselor told her, falsely, that she could carry an ectopic pregnancy (a very dangerous situation to both mother and potential child) to term if she was "careful," and urged her to delay a decision to terminate the pregnancy. "I said, 'OK, so you want me to wait until it becomes illegal for me to get an abortion?'"
"They scanned my ID. They know where I live, they know my name, they have my f-cking license number. It felt like a completely different violation."
The national anti-abortion organizations that run the largest networks of pregnancy centers say they protect their clients' privacy. "That data is secure," Heartbeat International spokeswoman Andrea Trudden tells TIME.
Texas' six-week abortion ban offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who wins a civil case against either an abortion provider or someone who aided in an abortion. Oklahoma also offers $10,000 in its sweeping abortion ban, which went into effect in May.
By offering a substantial monetary reward, the Texas, Oklahoma, and Idaho laws, and the National Right to Life model bill, potentially create a powerful motivation for anyone who has access to pregnancy-center databases. "The data," says Peterson of Gender Justice, "literally has a price tag on it."
Close to 20% of pregnancy centers nationwide now receive public funding (Up to $8M/yr in 12 states, $50,000,000/yr in TX. Nice call on that no taxpayer money, Muck. :dog).
Source: https://time.com/6189528/anti-abortion- ... stigation/ (the link in the tweet)
"The data is secure. You can trust me: I'm a spokesperson." We all know that nobody would sell people's private data, especially not for a $10,000 bounty.
:ays , Muck? Never forget, indeed.
Anecdote of someone who *gasp* had to present ID and a theory about something that could happen, but never has. Yes, never forget the thing that never even happened. :facepalm
She was high risk for an ectopic pregnancy, but obviously didn't have one, or the leftist pro-mutilators certainly would have mentioned it. Another baby needlessly killed. Good job!
You are partially correct regarding funding. 14% are funded. 86 percent of pregnancy centers receive no public funding whatsoever. Those that do receive public funding are required to use it for services such as sexual risk avoidance education — with 1.1 million students attending these presentations — and STD testing and treatment.
While showing your ID can certainly be a traumatizing experience, I'd guess that most people would find these worse:Spoiler:Spoiler:Spoiler:Spoiler:Spoiler:
CPCs receive a few million here and there from states, but Planned Parenthood is a $1-plus billion business that rakes in one-third of its budget from government grants and contracts at both the state and federal levels.
All Churchy groups are a little cultish for my tastes, but if I had to choose I'd take the cult of saving babies over the cult of killing babies.
Kinda weird that you use a bunch of innocent children mercilessly slaughtered by federal funded agencies as a means of attacking me. And CPCs obviously can't force anyone to do anything.
Do you read what you write? :biglol
"DEMOCRATS want to shut down information harvesters that want to prevent legal abortions from people who WANT abortions! False advertising is fine! Better to kill a potential mother and potential baby in a deadly pregnancy than to remove a fetus!"
"Better to have unwanted children growing up in Family Services and foster homes using taxpayer money than to NOT have unwanted children! Also, why is there so much traffic? We need a culling."
"Guns killing actual people is fine, you know, 2nd Amendment. But doctors removing pre-life parasites? That's just wrong!"
"Why are we printing more money?! It's not like the population is growing. Stupid inflation!"
Yes, everyone knows Planned Parenthood (PP) can prevent rape. I don't know why they have so much funding. Forcing a middle-schooler to have a baby is the right thing to do. God knows how she'll financially support a baby she never wanted, but think of the children... no, not the children bearing and "raising" children, the children of children! Gosh! Octomom is a hero for needlessly creating massive financial burdens not only on herself but on taxpayers.
CPCs can't force anyone to do anything, but PP can. CPCs can just take all your information, sell it if they so choose, and tell you to wait to abort fetuses until it's illegal. :dog
I hope you view onanism and menstruation as crimes because they're just about as much "killing babies" as legal abortions are. :lolthumb
JdPat04 wrote:Masturbation and menstruation are not the same as abortion and trying to argue that is fucking retarded.
I support the right to have an abortion so I'm not anti abortion but don't spew bullshit to try and get your point across.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Do you read what you write? :biglol
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"DEMOCRATS want to shut down information harvesters
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:that want to prevent legal abortions from people who WANT abortions! False advertising is fine!
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Better to kill a potential mother and potential baby in a deadly pregnancy than to remove a fetus!"
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"Better to have unwanted children growing up in Family Services and foster homes using taxpayer money than to NOT have unwanted children!
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Also, why is there so much traffic? We need a culling."
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"Guns killing actual people is fine, you know, 2nd Amendment.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:But doctors removing pre-life parasites? That's just wrong!"
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"Why are we printing more money?! It's not like the population is growing. Stupid inflation!"
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Yes, everyone knows Planned Parenthood (PP) can prevent rape.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I don't know why they have so much funding.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Forcing a middle-schooler to have a baby is the right thing to do. God knows how she'll financially support a baby she never wanted, but think of the children... no, not the children bearing and "raising" children, the children of children!
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Gosh! Octomom is a hero for needlessly creating massive financial burdens not only on herself but on taxpayers.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:CPCs can't force anyone to do anything
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:but PP can.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:CPCs can just take all your information, sell it if they so choose, and tell you to wait to abort fetuses until it's illegal. :dog
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I hope you view onanism and menstruation as crimes because they're just about as much "killing babies" as legal abortions are. :lolthumb
Muck FcDisney wrote:Textbook strawman.
The vast majority of babies are viable at 24 weeks, and 33 states still allow viable babies to be aborted. Calling viable human life "not actual people" and "parasites" is inhumane and disgusting.
Gallup wrote:According to the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks abortion statistics, late-trimester abortions are rare -- only 1.3% are conducted later than 20 (not 24) weeks, whereas 89% are performed within the first 12 weeks.
No one is forcing middle schoolers to have babies.
Muck FcDisney wrote:full grown (sic) parasites who have kids
Muck FcDisney wrote:Calling viable human life "not actual people" and "parasites" is inhumane and disgusting.
Muck FcDisney wrote:You only have to read through the responses that aren't ratioed to see how pretty much everyone feels about this crazy, wannabe Native American's nutjob opinion.
In fact, the response below from some noname has more likes than Liz's tweet :dog :
The Left: You’re only pro-birth! You don’t want to help babies after their born!
Crisis Pregnancy Centers: oh yes we do! That’s why we exist!
The Left: WE ARE SHUTTING YOU DOWN!
ericberry14 wrote:I’m glad y’all are having fun but i have still yet to read one of these novels lol
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I'm the retard.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Honestly any biological parent should have to undergo the same scrutiny and testing
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Too bad for you I never said that about those stages.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Also hilarious that you're quoting 5.5 months (24 weeks) which is at the very tail end of the 2nd trimester. I may differ on your definition of "viable" if a child is born ~3 months early. Seems like they'd still be put in an incubator and under intensive care. But sure, they're "viable."
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote: :biglol So much outrage over legal abortion when your own source states that at most only 1.3% are done after the fetus is "viable"
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Speaking of murdering babies, are "mothers" of stillborn babies (at least) guilty of negligent homicide?
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:If you aren't a vegetarian or vegan, you have no room to talk about dismembering anything being wrong.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:If abortion is made illegal, that's legally forcing middle schoolers who were raped (or not) and become pregnant to have babies. They're so young maybe they don't track their cycle or even know they're pregnant until the 2nd trimester, which you've stated you oppose and presumably consider murdering babies. So is a middle schooler who finds out she's 3-months pregnant a baby murderer if she gets an abortion ASAP (within a week)? I mean that's still well ahead of the 24 weeks you cite as "viable."
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:full grown (sic) parasites who have kidsMuck FcDisney wrote:Calling viable human life "not actual people" and "parasites" is inhumane and disgusting.
. :lolthumb Nice one, Muck.
Muck FcDisney wrote:I'll just respond like you do.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I'm the retard.
Yes.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Honestly any biological parent should have to undergo the same scrutiny and testing
Your people would call that racism.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Too bad for you I never said that about those stages.
If you don't approve on 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions, we are in agreement.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Also hilarious that you're quoting 5.5 months (24 weeks) which is at the very tail end of the 2nd trimester. I may differ on your definition of "viable" if a child is born ~3 months early. Seems like they'd still be put in an incubator and under intensive care. But sure, they're "viable."
The vast majority are the definition of viable, yes. No need for quotation marks.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote: :biglol So much outrage over legal abortion when your own source states that at most only 1.3% are done after the fetus is "viable"
That's about 7,000 per year.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Speaking of murdering babies, are "mothers" of stillborn babies (at least) guilty of negligent homicide?
If they partied like Hunter Biden on a slow day, absolutely. I wouldn't even call it negligent.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:If you aren't a vegetarian or vegan, you have no room to talk about dismembering anything being wrong.
Is this the cannibal's argument?FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:If abortion is made illegal, that's legally forcing middle schoolers who were raped (or not) and become pregnant to have babies. They're so young maybe they don't track their cycle or even know they're pregnant until the 2nd trimester, which you've stated you oppose and presumably consider murdering babies. So is a middle schooler who finds out she's 3-months pregnant a baby murderer if she gets an abortion ASAP (within a week)? I mean that's still well ahead of the 24 weeks you cite as "viable."
If pigs could fly, you might need FAA approval to eat them.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:full grown (sic) parasites who have kidsMuck FcDisney wrote:Calling viable human life "not actual people" and "parasites" is inhumane and disgusting.
. :lolthumb Nice one, Muck.
Fetuses aren't parasites.
Welfare mooches are metaphorical parasites.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 585 guests