bigbluebazooka wrote:If I don’t take the jab I’m 100% safe from any side effects and I have a 99% chance of surviving Covid.
Anyone check on KW lately?
I’m dead! I didn’t make it.
Moderator: JdPat04
bigbluebazooka wrote:If I don’t take the jab I’m 100% safe from any side effects and I have a 99% chance of surviving Covid.
Anyone check on KW lately?
FSUKW wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:If I don’t take the jab I’m 100% safe from any side effects and I have a 99% chance of surviving Covid.
Anyone check on KW lately?
I’m dead! I didn’t make it.
bigbluebazooka wrote:The NHL, NBA, and the NFL ARE 95-100% vaccinated yet players keep testing positive for Covid. :dunno
bigbluebazooka wrote:Good ole Bob Saget bragged about getting his booster shot and they just found him dead in a hotel in Orlando. The clot shot worked.
FSUKW wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:If I don’t take the jab I’m 100% safe from any side effects and I have a 99% chance of surviving Covid.
Anyone check on KW lately?
I’m dead! I didn’t make it.
ericberry14 wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:Good ole Bob Saget bragged about getting his booster shot and they just found him dead in a hotel in Orlando. The clot shot worked.
How long after?
ericberry14 wrote:Does anyone remember hearing about the Yale 2018 study that showed white liberals dumb down their vocabulary when speaking to colored people and white conservatives don’t? That woke up a few libs who said, and obviously so, that’s racist! But most tried to spin it by saying that libs were trying to make connections when conservatives weren’t. No… libs are just patronizing racists :yes
George W. Bush wrote:Fool me once, shame on... shame on you.
... You fool me, you can't get fooled again.
George W. Bush wrote:I know that (?) human being and fish can coexist peacefully.
JdPat04 wrote:https://youtu.be/3bWM1zsnTJc
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:ericberry14 wrote:Does anyone remember hearing about the Yale 2018 study that showed white liberals dumb down their vocabulary when speaking to colored people and white conservatives don’t? That woke up a few libs who said, and obviously so, that’s racist! But most tried to spin it by saying that libs were trying to make connections when conservatives weren’t. No… libs are just patronizing racists :yes
If you "dumb down" conservative speech, it doesn't really qualify as speech. It's more like grunts or noises. :lolthumbGeorge W. Bush wrote:Fool me once, shame on... shame on you.
... You fool me, you can't get fooled again.George W. Bush wrote:I know that (?) human being and fish can coexist peacefully.
And he's the smarter conservative president of the 21st century. :biglol
Lulz aside, you can interpret that data both ways: libtards trying to communicate clearly with people who may not understand unpopular English vernacular and that libtards genuinely think less of minorities' English skills. Foreigners especially suck at English. As a techie, it's hard for me to gauge at what level to speak to people when troubleshooting tech. They might know what a MAC whitelist is. They might not know what a mouse is. They might be a smart idiot that thinks it's called a Mac address. It's very easy to appear either stuck-up by using jargon that goes over the user's head or appear patronizing by using verbiage that is "lower" than their actual level. I think it's more popular to use the lower vernacular that can be understood rather than risk looking like a dick and confusing and upsetting the user by talking over their head.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 574 guests