FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Calling my argument retarded and pointless because
I called your argument retarded because it is.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I called you out for being wrong
You know everyone can watch the games in real time, right?
You know some of the best people who pick ATS for a living are wrong about 45% of the time, right?
You must look at point spreads and think to yourself, "3.5 points? How can a team even score half a point? They're gonna be wrong! Vegas is so stupid, and I'm so smart!"FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:and too stupid to understand my sig.
I really didn't think it could be that stupid. I promise not to overestimate your wit again.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Bonus points for bringing up another thread.
Who wins points because I compared one of your weak arguments to another? Are you okay? :crazy
If you're going to criticize someone's picks after the games are played without even making any picks yourself, you might as well be going around patting yourself on the back for pointing out the weatherman was wrong. Pointless, and frankly, pathetic.
Rent-free and doubling down on your own stupidity. Classic. :lolthumb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaRM8kvS1m0
I bet you don't even get why "You may not have a job tomorrow" is funny in that clip. According to you, that's a normal prediction and not something worth ridiculing. :ROFL2
Thank you for explaining why you don't gamble. :ROFL
You argue like a child.
Never thought I'd say this, but aubert 1.0 was actually more coherent.
If anyone else is still learning English, "You may not have a job tomorrow" is not a prediction. :facepalm
Stop wasting my time with this nonsense.