Moderator: JdPat04
ericberry14 wrote:Bama vs whoever they are playing
bigbluebazooka wrote:Can we bring back Nevin Shapiro now that we can legally pay players? :facepalm
:finger the NCAA
Miami is the Pete Rose of college football.
Muck FcDisney wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:Can we bring back Nevin Shapiro now that we can legally pay players? :facepalm
:finger the NCAA
Miami is the Pete Rose of college football.
Yes, Pete Rose has been retired for decades.
Muck FcDisney wrote:...of the week! (Week 2)
Ohio St (-14.5) vs 0regon - Yeah, tUOS struggled a bit with Mini-soda, but 0regon struggled mightily with Fresno St. tUOS might even trail at the half... but they win by 20+.
[ img ]
UAB/UGA, UNDER 45 - Wow. 45 is a low O/U. These teams allowed a combined 3 points last week! (UAB played Jax St, but whatever) Dawgs win 38-3.
[ img ] Over.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:...of the week! (Week 2)
Ohio St (-14.5) vs 0regon - Yeah, tUOS struggled a bit with Mini-soda, but 0regon struggled mightily with Fresno St. tUOS might even trail at the half... but they win by 20+.
[ img ]
UAB/UGA, UNDER 45 - Wow. 45 is a low O/U. These teams allowed a combined 3 points last week! (UAB played Jax St, but whatever) Dawgs win 38-3.
[ img ] Over.
Muck FcDisney wrote:Week 3!
Wake Forest (-6.5) vs FSwho - Finally! The Noles won't lose by 3 on the final play.
Alabama (-15.5) at Florida - I just get the feeling Bama and UGA are gonna steamroll everybody until they face each other.
Georgia (-30.5) vs South Carolina - See above. Cocks beat ECU on a last second FG.
Stanford (-10.5) @ Vandy - NERDS! Vandy ended their 11-game losing streak. Stanford crushed USCw. Nerdier nerds roll.
Purdon't (+7.5) @ Notre Dame - Irish win again, but don't cover again.
Virginia (+9) at North Carolina - Cavs are flying under the radar. May win outright.
Iowa (-22.5) vs Kent St - Hawkeyes are rolling. Avoid letdown.
Army (-33.5) vs UConn - UConn is really, really bad.
bigbluebazooka wrote:Michigan St at Miami :toetap
Muck FcDisney wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:Michigan St at Miami :toetap
:thought
I haven't seen Sparty this year.
30-24, Miami. :2thumbs
Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:...of the week! (Week 2)
Ohio St (-14.5) vs 0regon - Yeah, tUOS struggled a bit with Mini-soda, but 0regon struggled mightily with Fresno St. tUOS might even trail at the half... but they win by 20+.
[ img ]
UAB/UGA, UNDER 45 - Wow. 45 is a low O/U. These teams allowed a combined 3 points last week! (UAB played Jax St, but whatever) Dawgs win 38-3.
[ img ] Over.
Look forward to seeing your picks next week, smartass. :2thumbs
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:...of the week! (Week 2)
Ohio St (-14.5) vs 0regon - Yeah, tUOS struggled a bit with Mini-soda, but 0regon struggled mightily with Fresno St. tUOS might even trail at the half... but they win by 20+.
[ img ]
UAB/UGA, UNDER 45 - Wow. 45 is a low O/U. These teams allowed a combined 3 points last week! (UAB played Jax St, but whatever) Dawgs win 38-3.
[ img ] Over.
Look forward to seeing your picks next week, smartass. :2thumbs
1. I don't gamble. The house always wins unless you're counting cards in 21 and then they kick you out for "cheating."
2. I rarely make predictions about sports. It's a good way to end up looking like a fucking retard.
3. You were also wrong about Iowa State beating Iowa and Miami(FL) covering the spread,
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:If it's not right, it's wrong.
Muck FcDisney wrote:1. This is not gambling. It's simulated gambling. Just for fun. I'd prefer to do Pick Em, but we don't have enough people.
2. Sounds like an ego problem. Or a cowardice problem. Maybe both.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:If it's not right, it's wrong.
If you never make a pick, you're never right, which makes you always wrong. ;)Spoiler:
3. I went 3-3. Not good, but at least I didn't deprive you of the opportunity to play Monday morning quarterback.
Muck FcDisney wrote:This is more retarded and pointless than your "Texas is a contender!" argument. If you disagree with any of my picks, please feel free to point that out before the games are played.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Calling my argument retarded and pointless because
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I called you out for being wrong
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:and too stupid to understand my sig.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Bonus points for bringing up another thread.
bigbluebazooka wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:Michigan St at Miami :toetap
:thought
I haven't seen Sparty this year.
30-24, Miami. :2thumbs
:4thumbs
Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Calling my argument retarded and pointless because
I called your argument retarded because it is.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I called you out for being wrong
You know everyone can watch the games in real time, right?
You know some of the best people who pick ATS for a living are wrong about 45% of the time, right?
You must look at point spreads and think to yourself, "3.5 points? How can a team even score half a point? They're gonna be wrong! Vegas is so stupid, and I'm so smart!"FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:and too stupid to understand my sig.
I really didn't think it could be that stupid. I promise not to overestimate your wit again.FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Bonus points for bringing up another thread.
Who wins points because I compared one of your weak arguments to another? Are you okay? :crazy
If you're going to criticize someone's picks after the games are played without even making any picks yourself, you might as well be going around patting yourself on the back for pointing out the weatherman was wrong. Pointless, and frankly, pathetic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests