Moderator: JdPat04
Muck FcDisney wrote:Some people FAIL to read the first sentence of an article before calling it wrong.
"Never hesitant to share their true feelings, Burger King has called out the Federal Communications Commission's repeal of net neutrality in a new commercial, explaining the somewhat-confusing decision via Whoopers."
Could they have worded the title better? Sure. But this makes for better click-bait. Looks like someone was successfully baited. :dog Faux thanks you for your support. :lolthumb
Back to CNN, pleb:
https://i.imgur.com/MllhLG3.jpg
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Some people FAIL to read the first sentence of an article before calling it wrong.
"Never hesitant to share their true feelings, Burger King has called out the Federal Communications Commission's repeal of net neutrality in a new commercial, explaining the somewhat-confusing decision via Whoopers."
Could they have worded the title better? Sure. But this makes for better click-bait. Looks like someone was successfully baited. :dog Faux thanks you for your support. :lolthumb
Back to CNN, pleb:
https://i.imgur.com/MllhLG3.jpg
Yeah, I read it. The headline is still completely wrong.
If some article said "Obesity is a great health problem" but the title said "Obesity is great health," I would still say it's shit.
I was "baited" by watching the video and later finding an article about it from one of the few news sites you don't completely disregard because "Faux News is real!". I'm sure not having "repeal" in the title really upped their click count. Plus I use ABP, so it's not like they get anything. :dog
Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Some people FAIL to read the first sentence of an article before calling it wrong.
"Never hesitant to share their true feelings, Burger King has called out the Federal Communications Commission's repeal of net neutrality in a new commercial, explaining the somewhat-confusing decision via Whoopers."
Could they have worded the title better? Sure. But this makes for better click-bait. Looks like someone was successfully baited. :dog Faux thanks you for your support. :lolthumb
Back to CNN, pleb:
https://i.imgur.com/MllhLG3.jpg
Yeah, I read it. The headline is still completely wrong.
If some article said "Obesity is a great health problem" but the title said "Obesity is great health," I would still say it's shit.
I was "baited" by watching the video and later finding an article about it from one of the few news sites you don't completely disregard because "Faux News is real!". I'm sure not having "repeal" in the title really upped their click count. Plus I use ABP, so it's not like they get anything. :dog
Textbook clickbait... or a typo. Don't act like this is uncommon.
Please, list the places where I do and do not get my news. :popcorn
Back to CNN, pleb
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Some people FAIL to read the first sentence of an article before calling it wrong.
"Never hesitant to share their true feelings, Burger King has called out the Federal Communications Commission's repeal of net neutrality in a new commercial, explaining the somewhat-confusing decision via Whoopers."
Could they have worded the title better? Sure. But this makes for better click-bait. Looks like someone was successfully baited. :dog Faux thanks you for your support. :lolthumb
Back to CNN, pleb:
https://i.imgur.com/MllhLG3.jpg
Yeah, I read it. The headline is still completely wrong.
If some article said "Obesity is a great health problem" but the title said "Obesity is great health," I would still say it's shit.
I was "baited" by watching the video and later finding an article about it from one of the few news sites you don't completely disregard because "Faux News is real!". I'm sure not having "repeal" in the title really upped their click count. Plus I use ABP, so it's not like they get anything. :dog
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Some people FAIL to read the first sentence of an article before calling it wrong.
"Never hesitant to share their true feelings, Burger King has called out the Federal Communications Commission's repeal of net neutrality in a new commercial, explaining the somewhat-confusing decision via Whoopers."
Could they have worded the title better? Sure. But this makes for better click-bait. Looks like someone was successfully baited. :dog Faux thanks you for your support. :lolthumb
Back to CNN, pleb:
https://i.imgur.com/MllhLG3.jpg
Yeah, I read it. The headline is still completely wrong.
If some article said "Obesity is a great health problem" but the title said "Obesity is great health," I would still say it's shit.
I was "baited" by watching the video and later finding an article about it from one of the few news sites you don't completely disregard because "Faux News is real!". I'm sure not having "repeal" in the title really upped their click count. Plus I use ABP, so it's not like they get anything. :dog
They added "repeal" to the title and never noted the mistake. URL still shows the initial :fail title. Full Repug. :biglol
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Some people FAIL to read the first sentence of an article before calling it wrong.
"Never hesitant to share their true feelings, Burger King has called out the Federal Communications Commission's repeal of net neutrality in a new commercial, explaining the somewhat-confusing decision via Whoopers."
Could they have worded the title better? Sure. But this makes for better click-bait. Looks like someone was successfully baited. :dog Faux thanks you for your support. :lolthumb
Back to CNN, pleb:
https://i.imgur.com/MllhLG3.jpg
Yeah, I read it. The headline is still completely wrong.
If some article said "Obesity is a great health problem" but the title said "Obesity is great health," I would still say it's shit.
I was "baited" by watching the video and later finding an article about it from one of the few news sites you don't completely disregard because "Faux News is real!". I'm sure not having "repeal" in the title really upped their click count. Plus I use ABP, so it's not like they get anything. :dog
Textbook clickbait... or a typo. Don't act like this is uncommon.
Yet you give Obama shit for saying there were >50 states. :ROFL2
News sites should have headlines that aren't contradicted in the very first sentence. But then again, Faux News is a shitty excuse for a news site, so I guess it's fitting. It's analogous to Faux News saying there are negative 50 states in the USA.
Please, list the places where I do and do not get my news. :popcornBack to CNN, pleb
:thought :fail
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Some people FAIL to read the first sentence of an article before calling it wrong.
"Never hesitant to share their true feelings, Burger King has called out the Federal Communications Commission's repeal of net neutrality in a new commercial, explaining the somewhat-confusing decision via Whoopers."
Could they have worded the title better? Sure. But this makes for better click-bait. Looks like someone was successfully baited. :dog Faux thanks you for your support. :lolthumb
Back to CNN, pleb:
https://i.imgur.com/MllhLG3.jpg
Yeah, I read it. The headline is still completely wrong.
If some article said "Obesity is a great health problem" but the title said "Obesity is great health," I would still say it's shit.
I was "baited" by watching the video and later finding an article about it from one of the few news sites you don't completely disregard because "Faux News is real!". I'm sure not having "repeal" in the title really upped their click count. Plus I use ABP, so it's not like they get anything. :dog
They added "repeal" to the title and never noted the mistake. URL still shows the initial :fail title. Full Repug. :biglol
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:
Please, list the places where I do and do not get my news. :popcorn
Back to CNN, pleb
:thought :fail
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 487 guests