Moderator: JdPat04
Canes_Knights wrote:Of course the committee is corrupt. Once the human element is introduced, corruption is soon to follow.
Carr2Cooper wrote:Canes_Knights wrote:Of course the committee is corrupt. Once the human element is introduced, corruption is soon to follow.
Computers weren't much better. It was created by a human and biased a lot towards certain groups
Canes_Knights wrote:Carr2Cooper wrote:Canes_Knights wrote:Of course the committee is corrupt. Once the human element is introduced, corruption is soon to follow.
Computers weren't much better. It was created by a human and biased a lot towards certain groups
Well, of course it was created by a human. But what we need if we're going to rank teams is an objective metric that we just feed statistics into. This whole idea of "eyeball tests" and things like that are pretty stupid, when you stop and think about it.
Canes_Knights wrote:Carr2Cooper wrote:Canes_Knights wrote:Of course the committee is corrupt. Once the human element is introduced, corruption is soon to follow.
Computers weren't much better. It was created by a human and biased a lot towards certain groups
Well, of course it was created by a human. But what we need if we're going to rank teams is an objective metric that we just feed statistics into. This whole idea of "eyeball tests" and things like that are pretty stupid, when you stop and think about it.
CraigKressel wrote:Miss State, LSU, Auburn rankings are clearly biased and have been all year.
mrfree wrote:Canes_Knights wrote:Carr2Cooper wrote:Canes_Knights wrote:Of course the committee is corrupt. Once the human element is introduced, corruption is soon to follow.
Computers weren't much better. It was created by a human and biased a lot towards certain groups
Well, of course it was created by a human. But what we need if we're going to rank teams is an objective metric that we just feed statistics into. This whole idea of "eyeball tests" and things like that are pretty stupid, when you stop and think about it.
Miami beat syracuse and syracuse beat clemson yet clemson is ranked higher :timeout
mrfree wrote:Lebump
This dude is right
JdPat04 wrote:mrfree wrote:Lebump
This dude is right
Because of ohsu and ncstates absurd ranking?
JdPat04 wrote:mrfree wrote:Lebump
This dude is right
Because of ohsu and ncstates absurd ranking?
Muck FcDisney wrote:JdPat04 wrote:mrfree wrote:Lebump
This dude is right
Because of ohsu and ncstates absurd ranking?
What are you talking about? :dunno
JdPat04 wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:JdPat04 wrote:mrfree wrote:Lebump
This dude is right
Because of ohsu and ncstates absurd ranking?
What are you talking about? :dunno
ohsu ranked too high after getting clown stomped by Iowa
Penn st over ranked after losing to ohsu and mich St and mich St got clown stomped by ohsu who's been beaten soundly TWICE.
Building that resume for ohsu with having their opponents ranked that high.
CraigKressel wrote:Who would you rank ahead of Ohio State that isn't and why? USC got stomped, TCU got stomped, Oklahoma State got stomped and none of them played as tough of a schedule as Ohio State so far and haven't been as dominant throughout the season.
I agree about Michigan State I cannot believe they are 17th. The committee seems to be ignoring losses this year with shit like Syracuse.
Muck FcDisney wrote:CraigKressel wrote:Who would you rank ahead of Ohio State that isn't and why? USC got stomped, TCU got stomped, Oklahoma State got stomped and none of them played as tough of a schedule as Ohio State so far and haven't been as dominant throughout the season.
I agree about Michigan State I cannot believe they are 17th. The committee seems to be ignoring losses this year with shit like Syracuse.
I could see TCU over Ohio St.
Both played OU...
TCU lost by 18 on the road, OSU lost by 15 at home. Homefield advantage is generally worth about 3 points, but even more at places like OU and OSU. Advantage TCU.
Both lost to a 6-4 team on the road. TCU lost by 7, OSU lost by 31. Advantage TCU.
TCU's best win is a 13-point win on the road against Oklahoma St. OSU's best win is a 1-point win at home against PSU. Considering PSU and Okie St are comparable, advantage TCU.
OSU's assraping of Meatchicken St is obviously more impressive than TCU's 7-point win over WVU. Advantage OSU.
OSU's FBS opponents are slightly better (.580 to .566), and TCU's P5 opponents are slightly better (.585 to .575). Tie.
OSU's MOV against FBS is much better: 23.6 to 12.4. Advantage OSU.
It's pretty close. But if you're saying TCU got "stomped", then OSU got "stomped" by OU as well... and got utterly clownstomped through the other side of the earth by Iowa.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 413 guests