Moderator: JdPat04

Muck FcDisney wrote:Oh, and from the official FBI release:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.
To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Is this the FBI's not so subtle way of telling us...
[ img ]
I wonder if #BLM will take note... :thought


Eye_of_Horus wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Oh, and from the official FBI release:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.
To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Is this the FBI's not so subtle way of telling us...
[ img ]
I wonder if #BLM will take note... :thought
Does this mean that she may still be hit with security or administration sanctions?

Eye_of_Horus wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Oh, and from the official FBI release:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.
To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Is this the FBI's not so subtle way of telling us...
[ img ]
I wonder if #BLM will take note... :thought
Does this mean that she may still be hit with security or administration sanctions?

Muck FcDisney wrote:Eye_of_Horus wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Oh, and from the official FBI release:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.
To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Is this the FBI's not so subtle way of telling us...
[ img ]
I wonder if #BLM will take note... :thought
Does this mean that she may still be hit with security or administration sanctions?
It will make it awkward if she's given clearance again. If she was still Sec of State, her clearance would have likely been revoked, forcing her to step down.
Simply put, the government doesn't trust someone so deceitful and careless to have access to classified information. Somehow, liberals take this to mean she's fit to be president. :facepalm

Eye_of_Horus wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Eye_of_Horus wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Oh, and from the official FBI release:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.
To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Is this the FBI's not so subtle way of telling us...
[ img ]
I wonder if #BLM will take note... :thought
Does this mean that she may still be hit with security or administration sanctions?
It will make it awkward if she's given clearance again. If she was still Sec of State, her clearance would have likely been revoked, forcing her to step down.
Simply put, the government doesn't trust someone so deceitful and careless to have access to classified information. Somehow, liberals take this to mean she's fit to be president. :facepalm
So if she becomes President, what happens? is she not given clearance or does she fire everyone until someone gives her clearance?


JdPat04 wrote:Isn't lying to congress a punishable offense?


JdPat04 wrote:Isn't lying to congress a punishable offense?

SmithsAUFan wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Isn't lying to congress a punishable offense?
Congress is every bit as fucked up as any branch of government or agency that the government supports. I am sure King George of England in the late 1700s had higher approval ratings than Congress.

JdPat04 wrote:SmithsAUFan wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Isn't lying to congress a punishable offense?
Congress is every bit as fucked up as any branch of government or agency that the government supports. I am sure King George of England in the late 1700s had higher approval ratings than Congress.
Yeah but what's the point? She lied to the congress, she lied to the American people.
They won't charge her for the other shit. What excuse could they make up for that?
DOJ opened up another investigation on her BUT :biglol at thinking that will do anything :facepalm



ericberry14 wrote:You regurgitate the same bullshit constantly but never say anything. Say Monsanto again... Please

aubert wrote:man you guys kill me. cheney and bush destroyed millions of emails.............MILLIONS...........and they get a free pass. hell the black man on their team came out and said the servers used by the gov were hacked so much people were encouraged to use a different server. and from what i got it was not hill who did all that but some of her staff. you guys hate her so much you believe anything. i did. she is not on the board of monsanto. and as far as benghazi do you guys really believe hill would be the one to make the decision that is left to the military? really? some of you guys should know better. i doubt things have changed that much since i was in the service. and people hate she is a bitch. hell in a mans world you have to be some what of a bitch or you will get ground underfoot. hell i would rather have a bitch in office than a timid woman. and people are upset she told a widow to get over it. hey i am sure she gets tired of being blamed for something the military bears responsibility for. and some of the widows have come out and said she was not to blame. and of course no one mentions that the repubs cut security funding which put them in more danger to begin with. y'alls boy trump has had 140 something federal lawsuits. it has been proven he set shit up to fail after getting investers to finance his bullshit. and no one mentions the 13 yr old is suing him for rape with some other women. he has not paid a penny of taxes ever that i can see and wantes to bitch about obama and air force one? you people are willing to burn down this country to hurt certain people and parties even if it mentions destroying the country to do it.
someone tell me what the repubs have done GOOD for this country? i will wait....and how about ol trey goober busted for changing emails to make hill look bad and yet folks seem to think this is ok? all the repubs do is steal money from programs for the needy and give it to the rich one percent. oh and they want to manage womens vagina's. hell one repub senator i believe said troops will never be taken care of after war and it has always been like that. and no i do not have a link. i just think it is a dman shame the repubs are so out of touch they have to swiftboat people to make them look bad or make them look worse. they cannot win on rah rahing the flag and the bible. look at kansas. they are in the shitter big time. so is lou after jindle did the same thing. hell look at walker. tried to break the law to strip workers of rights only for it to be overturned in court. and lets not forget meatchickens gov who was more interested in saving a buck than poisoning the people of flint..KNOWING they did it the whole time and forcing the water quality people to lie about it. i will party when he goes to jail.
but all that being said i am still voting for johnson. he told bill maher he had never smoked pot but had tried the edibles.......and that is my man. why? he seems mostly honest and i want the indies to get the fifteen percent......


Users browsing this forum: BUCKEYEWILLY34 and 108 guests