Page 6 of 9

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 1st, 2014, 11:53 pm
by ericberry14
yeah if there were a bunch of girl posters here I might post a dick pic myself... but since its just a bunch of fags it would be weird ;dog

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 1st, 2014, 11:53 pm
by semperfi4727
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:Are Christian's not supposed to want to see tits? :dunno


Pretty sure it's a sin in a few different ways it's also morally wrong


Viewing breasts is a sin? Interesting, what bible quote does that fall under?

As for 'morally wrong', please. This place has been host to the morally wrong for it's entire existence.

Countless Fappening threads where people had their naked pics hacked and leaked for global exposure, or the tons of racist threads and posts that ultimately sent posters to other pastures never to return are just a piece of the morally wrong content that's been hosted here with no issue.

Don't pretend you're taking the moral high ground now, it's never existed here.


Im not the Christian. I kind of was as a kid growing up but i never knew too much.

However i can gurantee looking at porn (naked people is porn) also looking at naked people without their consent is a sin.

And yes I will take the moral high ground of posting a picture of one of our posters naked online. I wouldn't have been for that from day 1 and will never be for that. I would delete a pic of EB's dick too if she had posted it.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a fucking poster on here.

Nor was we the only source of the fappening pictures.

If you wanted to see that pic of her boons then the only place you could get it from is on here. Not every other place on the webs. So the fact that you can't differentiate that shows how dumb you are.



PS id like for any Christian to go to church and say "I got pissed because a stranger got boobs sent to him personally then he posted them online but he thought twice and wanted them deleted plus the owner of te board already deleted them but I got pissed because he deleted the pic of her boobs that she also didn't want online for everyone to see"


And see what would happen in any and every church.

Methodist
Baptist
Church of Christ
Mormon
Buddhist
Islam

Whatever the religion i bet they wouldn't think you were too serious about your religion.

You forgot communism where the state is the church

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 1st, 2014, 11:55 pm
by JdPat04
semperfi4727 wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:Are Christian's not supposed to want to see tits? :dunno


Pretty sure it's a sin in a few different ways it's also morally wrong


Viewing breasts is a sin? Interesting, what bible quote does that fall under?

As for 'morally wrong', please. This place has been host to the morally wrong for it's entire existence.

Countless Fappening threads where people had their naked pics hacked and leaked for global exposure, or the tons of racist threads and posts that ultimately sent posters to other pastures never to return are just a piece of the morally wrong content that's been hosted here with no issue.

Don't pretend you're taking the moral high ground now, it's never existed here.


Im not the Christian. I kind of was as a kid growing up but i never knew too much.

However i can gurantee looking at porn (naked people is porn) also looking at naked people without their consent is a sin.

And yes I will take the moral high ground of posting a picture of one of our posters naked online. I wouldn't have been for that from day 1 and will never be for that. I would delete a pic of EB's dick too if she had posted it.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a fucking poster on here.

Nor was we the only source of the fappening pictures.

If you wanted to see that pic of her boons then the only place you could get it from is on here. Not every other place on the webs. So the fact that you can't differentiate that shows how dumb you are.



PS id like for any Christian to go to church and say "I got pissed because a stranger got boobs sent to him personally then he posted them online but he thought twice and wanted them deleted plus the owner of te board already deleted them but I got pissed because he deleted the pic of her boobs that she also didn't want online for everyone to see"


And see what would happen in any and every church.

Methodist
Baptist
Church of Christ
Mormon
Buddhist
Islam

Whatever the religion i bet they wouldn't think you were too serious about your religion.

You forgot communism where the state is the church


I didn't want YP to think I was taking a double jab at his beloved one Obama

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:00 am
by semperfi4727
JdPat04 wrote:
semperfi4727 wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:Are Christian's not supposed to want to see tits? :dunno


Pretty sure it's a sin in a few different ways it's also morally wrong


Viewing breasts is a sin? Interesting, what bible quote does that fall under?

As for 'morally wrong', please. This place has been host to the morally wrong for it's entire existence.

Countless Fappening threads where people had their naked pics hacked and leaked for global exposure, or the tons of racist threads and posts that ultimately sent posters to other pastures never to return are just a piece of the morally wrong content that's been hosted here with no issue.

Don't pretend you're taking the moral high ground now, it's never existed here.


Im not the Christian. I kind of was as a kid growing up but i never knew too much.

However i can gurantee looking at porn (naked people is porn) also looking at naked people without their consent is a sin.

And yes I will take the moral high ground of posting a picture of one of our posters naked online. I wouldn't have been for that from day 1 and will never be for that. I would delete a pic of EB's dick too if she had posted it.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a fucking poster on here.

Nor was we the only source of the fappening pictures.

If you wanted to see that pic of her boons then the only place you could get it from is on here. Not every other place on the webs. So the fact that you can't differentiate that shows how dumb you are.



PS id like for any Christian to go to church and say "I got pissed because a stranger got boobs sent to him personally then he posted them online but he thought twice and wanted them deleted plus the owner of te board already deleted them but I got pissed because he deleted the pic of her boobs that she also didn't want online for everyone to see"


And see what would happen in any and every church.

Methodist
Baptist
Church of Christ
Mormon
Buddhist
Islam

Whatever the religion i bet they wouldn't think you were too serious about your religion.

You forgot communism where the state is the church


I didn't want YP to think I was taking a double jab at his beloved one Obama

Obama isn't a communist, Stalin, mao, and fidel roll over in their Graves at such an insult

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:00 am
by Y4NK33 PL4N3T
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:Are Christian's not supposed to want to see tits? :dunno


Pretty sure it's a sin in a few different ways it's also morally wrong


Viewing breasts is a sin? Interesting, what bible quote does that fall under?

As for 'morally wrong', please. This place has been host to the morally wrong for it's entire existence.

Countless Fappening threads where people had their naked pics hacked and leaked for global exposure, or the tons of racist threads and posts that ultimately sent posters to other pastures never to return are just a piece of the morally wrong content that's been hosted here with no issue.

Don't pretend you're taking the moral high ground now, it's never existed here.


Im not the Christian. I kind of was as a kid growing up but i never knew too much.

However i can gurantee looking at porn (naked people is porn) also looking at naked people without their consent is a sin.

And yes I will take the moral high ground of posting a picture of one of our posters naked online. I wouldn't have been for that from day 1 and will never be for that. I would delete a pic of EB's dick too if she had posted it.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a fucking poster on here.

Nor was we the only source of the fappening pictures.

If you wanted to see that pic of her boons then the only place you could get it from is on here. Not every other place on the webs. So the fact that you can't differentiate that shows how dumb you are.



PS id like for any Christian to go to church and say "I got pissed because a stranger got boobs sent to him personally then he posted them online but he thought twice and wanted them deleted plus the owner of te board already deleted them but I got pissed because he deleted the pic of her boobs that she also didn't want online for everyone to see"


And see what would happen in any and every church.

Methodist
Baptist
Church of Christ
Mormon
Buddhist
Islam

Whatever the religion i bet they wouldn't think you were too serious about your religion.


Every post you make shows how dumb you are, so the safe bet for you is not to cast that stone buddy. :lol:

Moving along, whether someone is a poster here or not is irrelevant.

In fact, G-gurl knowingly sent a naked pic of herself to an anonymous man on the internet, she made that choice.

JLaw and the other victims of the Fappening did not give this same consent, so you have willingly and happily perpetuated a sex crime.

Congratulations, you're a hypocrite. :clap

Keep up the good work buddy. :up

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:01 am
by ericberry14
yeah I'm that anonymous man on the internet cuz i'm a fuckin badass like that

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:02 am
by semperfi4727
ericberry14 wrote:yeah I'm that anonymous man on the internet cuz i'm a fuckin badass like that

This was pretty badass, I'll give you that :yes

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:04 am
by ericberry14
Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:05 am
by semperfi4727
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

Ok, I'll give that to you. Apparently you can get your share

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:06 am
by ericberry14
semperfi4727 wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

Ok, I'll give that to you. Apparently you can get your share

:newnana :bananasex

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:08 am
by semperfi4727
ericberry14 wrote:
semperfi4727 wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

Ok, I'll give that to you. Apparently you can get your share

:newnana :bananasex

But you'll never get a pic of my girl, I saw what you did to gurlygirl

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:09 am
by Y4NK33 PL4N3T
ericberry14 wrote:yeah I'm that anonymous man on the internet cuz i'm a fuckin badass like that

:2thumbs

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:10 am
by MIAMIDOMINATION
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

what is so great about posting all types of personal information about another poster on this site?

i mean i have people i trust on here, including you EB, i wouldnt want you posting all types of personal stuff about me on here just like you probably wouldnt want me doing it to you

i dont find invading someones privacy entertaining at all

i dont believe jim won the lottery, but does that mean i should go out of my way to prove it? or ridicule him so badly that he never wants to come back?

i just dont see how tsh is a better place without 20

sure he was a narcissistic douche bag sometimes, but he was still a damn good poster

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:12 am
by Y4NK33 PL4N3T
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

what is so great about posting all types of personal information about another poster on this site?

i mean i have people i trust on here, including you EB, i wouldnt want you posting all types of personal stuff about me on here just like you probably wouldnt want me doing it to you

i dont find invading someones privacy entertaining at all

i dont believe jim won the lottery, but does that mean i should go out of my way to prove it? or ridicule him so badly that he never wants to come back?

i just dont see how tsh is a better place without 20

sure he was a narcissistic douche bag sometimes, but he was still a damn good poster

You make a lot of good points.

The problem is this: it's nearly impossible to feel bad for someone who acted like a douche bag to everyone else %99.99999999999999 of their time here.

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 12:13 am
by semperfi4727
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

what is so great about posting all types of personal information about another poster on this site?

i mean i have people i trust on here, including you EB, i wouldnt want you posting all types of personal stuff about me on here just like you probably wouldnt want me doing it to you

i dont find invading someones privacy entertaining at all

i dont believe jim won the lottery, but does that mean i should go out of my way to prove it? or ridicule him so badly that he never wants to come back?

i just dont see how tsh is a better place without 20

sure he was a narcissistic douche bag sometimes, but he was still a damn good poster

You can't honestly believe that, be real

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 1:22 am
by ericberry14
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

what is so great about posting all types of personal information about another poster on this site?

i mean i have people i trust on here, including you EB, i wouldnt want you posting all types of personal stuff about me on here just like you probably wouldnt want me doing it to you

i dont find invading someones privacy entertaining at all

i dont believe jim won the lottery, but does that mean i should go out of my way to prove it? or ridicule him so badly that he never wants to come back?

i just dont see how tsh is a better place without 20

sure he was a narcissistic douche bag sometimes, but he was still a damn good poster

I didn't go out of my way for any of this shit ;dog

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 1:43 am
by FSUKW
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:sure he was a narcissistic douche bag


:agree

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 3:57 pm
by MIAMIDOMINATION
ericberry14 wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

what is so great about posting all types of personal information about another poster on this site?

i mean i have people i trust on here, including you EB, i wouldnt want you posting all types of personal stuff about me on here just like you probably wouldnt want me doing it to you

i dont find invading someones privacy entertaining at all

i dont believe jim won the lottery, but does that mean i should go out of my way to prove it? or ridicule him so badly that he never wants to come back?

i just dont see how tsh is a better place without 20

sure he was a narcissistic douche bag sometimes, but he was still a damn good poster

I didn't go out of my way for any of this shit ;dog

yea i know man, i just dont want to gang up on the guy to the point that he never wants to come back

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 5:21 pm
by JdPat04
semperfi4727 wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
semperfi4727 wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:
JdPat04 wrote:
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:Are Christian's not supposed to want to see tits? :dunno


Pretty sure it's a sin in a few different ways it's also morally wrong


Viewing breasts is a sin? Interesting, what bible quote does that fall under?

As for 'morally wrong', please. This place has been host to the morally wrong for it's entire existence.

Countless Fappening threads where people had their naked pics hacked and leaked for global exposure, or the tons of racist threads and posts that ultimately sent posters to other pastures never to return are just a piece of the morally wrong content that's been hosted here with no issue.

Don't pretend you're taking the moral high ground now, it's never existed here.


Im not the Christian. I kind of was as a kid growing up but i never knew too much.

However i can gurantee looking at porn (naked people is porn) also looking at naked people without their consent is a sin.

And yes I will take the moral high ground of posting a picture of one of our posters naked online. I wouldn't have been for that from day 1 and will never be for that. I would delete a pic of EB's dick too if she had posted it.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a fucking poster on here.

Nor was we the only source of the fappening pictures.

If you wanted to see that pic of her boons then the only place you could get it from is on here. Not every other place on the webs. So the fact that you can't differentiate that shows how dumb you are.



PS id like for any Christian to go to church and say "I got pissed because a stranger got boobs sent to him personally then he posted them online but he thought twice and wanted them deleted plus the owner of te board already deleted them but I got pissed because he deleted the pic of her boobs that she also didn't want online for everyone to see"


And see what would happen in any and every church.

Methodist
Baptist
Church of Christ
Mormon
Buddhist
Islam

Whatever the religion i bet they wouldn't think you were too serious about your religion.

You forgot communism where the state is the church


I didn't want YP to think I was taking a double jab at his beloved one Obama

Obama isn't a communist, Stalin, mao, and fidel roll over in their Graves at such an insult


He's part commie, he's all about wealth redistribution

Re: The Real True Hollywood story:

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2014, 5:23 pm
by JdPat04
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
ericberry14 wrote:Anyone could have been lucky to bust out 20 for his bullshit. The real skill was getting the tit pics in a night :dog

what is so great about posting all types of personal information about another poster on this site?

i mean i have people i trust on here, including you EB, i wouldnt want you posting all types of personal stuff about me on here just like you probably wouldnt want me doing it to you

i dont find invading someones privacy entertaining at all

i dont believe jim won the lottery, but does that mean i should go out of my way to prove it? or ridicule him so badly that he never wants to come back?

i just dont see how tsh is a better place without 20

sure he was a narcissistic douche bag sometimes, but he was still a damn good poster

I didn't go out of my way for any of this shit ;dog

yea i know man, i just dont want to gang up on the guy to the point that he never wants to come back


Hey guess what 20 didn't tell EB anything. So EB didn't break anybody's trust. Now enough of your crybaby shit because your best buddy on here got what he deserved.