Moderator: JdPat04
Muck FcDisney wrote:Baylor > tUOS
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:That's what you get when you schedule so many OOC powerhouses and you play in probably the best AQ conference in the country. :4thumbs
JimTrenzel wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Baylor > tUOS
and what makes you say that? Using transitive property?
JimTrenzel wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:That's what you get when you schedule so many OOC powerhouses and you play in probably the best AQ conference in the country. :4thumbs
What powerhouse did Bama schedule?
What powerhouse did Oregon schedule?
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:JimTrenzel wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:That's what you get when you schedule so many OOC powerhouses and you play in probably the best AQ conference in the country. :4thumbs
What powerhouse did Bama schedule?
What powerhouse did Oregon schedule?
0regon has the same problems. But their offense did very well against a mediocre UVA defense. VT wasn't that bad a few years ago when Bama scheduled them.
But if you thought Buffalol, Cal, and San Diego Shit were going to be world-beaters, then Ohio State's educational standards are in serious trouble. You should have known your conference was a joke a long time ago. I mean you've run the place for the better part of the decade only to get your ass stomped by SEC teams (Arky* vacated).
I guess Ohio State just loves playing the Little Sisters of the Poor.
Jimhowlett wrote:Hate to bweak it to you, bwo, but when we schedule d Cal they were wegularly challenging U $ C in the Pac, before Oregon was anyone.
You're new at this, aren't you? :dog
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:JimTrenzel wrote:FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:That's what you get when you schedule so many OOC powerhouses and you play in probably the best AQ conference in the country. :4thumbs
What powerhouse did Bama schedule?
What powerhouse did Oregon schedule?
0regon has the same problems. But their offense did very well against a mediocre UVA defense. VT wasn't that bad a few years ago when Bama scheduled them.
But if you thought Buffalol, Cal, and San Diego Shit were going to be world-beaters, then Ohio State's educational standards are in serious trouble. You should have known your conference was a joke a long time ago. I mean you've run the place for the better part of the decade only to get your ass stomped by SEC teams (Arky* vacated).
I guess Ohio State just loves playing the Little Sisters of the Poor.
Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Hate to bweak it to you, bwo, but when we schedule d Cal they were wegularly challenging U $ C in the Pac, before Oregon was anyone.
You're new at this, aren't you? :dog
Uh, when did you schedule them? Cal hasn't "regulary challenged" shit this century: 1-11 vs U$C, and they're the only PAC-10 team to never make a BCS Bowl.
I mean the games were close between 2002-2004, but that just means tUOS has had 10 years to correct this scheduling error.
JimTrenzel wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Hate to bweak it to you, bwo, but when we schedule d Cal they were wegularly challenging U $ C in the Pac, before Oregon was anyone.
You're new at this, aren't you? :dog
Uh, when did you schedule them? Cal hasn't "regulary challenged" shit this century: 1-11 vs U$C, and they're the only PAC-10 team to never make a BCS Bowl.
I mean the games were close between 2002-2004, but that just means tUOS has had 10 years to correct this scheduling error.
What is VT's record in the BCS?
Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Hate to bweak it to you, bwo, but when we schedule d Cal they were wegularly challenging U $ C in the Pac, before Oregon was anyone.
You're new at this, aren't you? :dog
Uh, when did you schedule them? Cal hasn't "regulary challenged" shit this century: 1-11 vs U$C, and they're the only PAC-10 team to never make a BCS Bowl.
I mean the games were close between 2002-2004, but that just means tUOS has had 10 years to correct this scheduling error.
JimTrenzel wrote:What is VT's record in the BCS?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 411 guests