Interesting

I guess Bama and UGay are no longer dominating college football now that other schools can legally pay players now. :thought

That and they have to earn it on the field with more than 1 or 2 games.

True, but we don’t use a>b>c because it’s not accurate

JdPat04 wrote:True, but we don’t use a>b>c because it’s not accurate

This is not a > b > c. It's a > b is greater than a > c, so c > b... and both are not always accurate.

JdPat04 wrote:True, but we don’t use a>b>c because it’s not accurate

Indiana looked better than Georgia all year

Michigan is better than Alabama we saw that on the field
Ohio State is better than everyone in the SEC you had 6-6 and 7-5 Big 10 teams beating upper middle SEC teams so why wouldn't I assume that was the case for some of Indiana's opponents over Georgia's

Illinois was better than all the 3 loss SEC chumps.