Muck FcDisney wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:
Liberty >>>>>>>>>> New Mexico St >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6-6 Auburn = Bama
Bama's not even good enough to play for the Conference USA championship. :ROFL
Even Fresno St smoked the de facto SECt Champs. :champ
Didn’t expect asinine comments like this from Muck, but here we are
Did Liberty beat NMSU by at least 2 TDs... twice? Yes or no.
Did NMSU beat Barn by 3 TDs? Yes or no.
Did the SECt champs need a miracle and uncalled OPI to beat NMSU's bitch? Yes or no.
Did Fresno St beat NMSU by 4 TDs? Yes or no.
Would Bama make the CUSA championship if they played as well against Liberty and NMSU as they did against USF, A&M, Arkansas, or Auburn? I can answer that for you: :nuhuh
The only thing that's asinine is putting a couple of losers in the playoffs over an undefeated P5 conference champion.
Yeah we would make the conference championship. Auburn played up to Bama like they most normally do. Judging us from a close game with auburn in Jordan hare is asinine.
Not just (6-6) Auburn, but also (4-8) Arkansas (AT HOME), (7-6) USF, and (7-6) Texas A&M. Oh, and that big, fat double-digit LOSS (AT HOME) as well.
Still would’ve won CUSA championship :biglol
If you lost to NMSU and Liberty, I'm not sure how you plan on winning a championship you don't play in. :dunno
Being Bama, I suppose you could still claim the championship. :lolthumb
You thinking we’d lose to them because of transitive properties, sounds like espn and the committee saying you’d lose with your 3rd string so you don’t belong in the playoffs.
