I listed two.

Then I listed three that unless they get throttled OSU style by a shitty team, should stay ahead of OSU should they lose again.

It’s not rocket science what I did.

JdPat04 wrote:A 2 loss UGA, OU, and Clemson are not ranked over you.

Try again.

Do you live in some kind of fantasy land where those teams lost 2 games? What was the outcome of the 2nd loss, was it 1 point, 10 points, 30 points 100 points and who was it to?

So you are telling me if Georgia loses 80 to 0 to Kentucky they are going to be ranked ahead of Ohio State? If Clemson loses to Citadel are they going to be ranked ahead?

FSUKW wrote:I listed two.

Then I listed three that unless they get throttled OSU style by a shitty team, should stay ahead of OSU should they lose again.

It’s not rocket science what I did.

Definitely not rocket science cause only a retard would list 3 teams ranked ahead of a team for justification of that team being over ranked.

Also who would have predicted the Iowa game, if you are just giving these teams a fantasy loss how do you know what the fantasy loss would be?

Here I will do your argument for you.

1. TCU, because they beat Oklahoma State and didn't get blown out by a 6-4 team
2. UCF because they are undefeated and hammered everyone
3. Oklahoma State, because I don't know why I just wanted to say a team, might as well say Michigan, Penn State, etc because they have similar accomplishments.

TCU, I can say they lost to Iowa State got completely dominated that game by Iowa State's defense. Keep in mind this is a team that Iowa beat so that loss is equally bad.
Oklahoma loss was worse than Ohio State's.

Ohio State was competitive the whole game until the last 10 minutes or so when they fell behind, it was 3-3 at half. Then Ohio State beat PSU, and throttled MSU, TCU doesn't have anything to compare to those, hence this is why Ohio State is ranked higher.

MOV Ohio State has utterly dominated everyone on the schedule outside of 3 teams. TCU has had a lot closer games.

CraigKressel wrote:

FSUKW wrote:I listed two.

Then I listed three that unless they get throttled OSU style by a shitty team, should stay ahead of OSU should they lose again.

It’s not rocket science what I did.

Definitely not rocket science cause only a retard would list 3 teams ranked ahead of a team for justification of that team being over ranked.

Also who would have predicted the Iowa game, if you are just giving these teams a fantasy loss how do you know what the fantasy loss would be?

Justification = 31 point ass whooping

FSUKW wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:

FSUKW wrote:I listed two.

Then I listed three that unless they get throttled OSU style by a shitty team, should stay ahead of OSU should they lose again.

It’s not rocket science what I did.

Definitely not rocket science cause only a retard would list 3 teams ranked ahead of a team for justification of that team being over ranked.

Also who would have predicted the Iowa game, if you are just giving these teams a fantasy loss how do you know what the fantasy loss would be?

Justification = 31 point ass whooping

How much did Georgia, Clemson, Oklahoma lose their 2nd game by and who was it to?

Another flaw in your argument, if you are saying Ohio State is over ranked, why are you saying teams could lose again and still be ranked ahead of them? You literally make 0 sense.

CraigKressel wrote:

JdPat04 wrote:A 2 loss UGA, OU, and Clemson are not ranked over you.

Try again.

Do you live in some kind of fantasy land where those teams lost 2 games? What was the outcome of the 2nd loss, was it 1 point, 10 points, 30 points 100 points and who was it to?

So you are telling me if Georgia loses 80 to 0 to Kentucky they are going to be ranked ahead of Ohio State? If Clemson loses to Citadel are they going to be ranked ahead?

You can't read can you?


You're the dipshit who said "he listed 3 teams already ahead of them"

No he listed potential 2 loss teams.


He didn't list any 3 teams ahead of them you libtarded fuckstick. :wave2


PS: "what if" again.

What if you grow common sense, AGAIN

JdPat04 wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:

JdPat04 wrote:A 2 loss UGA, OU, and Clemson are not ranked over you.

Try again.

Do you live in some kind of fantasy land where those teams lost 2 games? What was the outcome of the 2nd loss, was it 1 point, 10 points, 30 points 100 points and who was it to?

So you are telling me if Georgia loses 80 to 0 to Kentucky they are going to be ranked ahead of Ohio State? If Clemson loses to Citadel are they going to be ranked ahead?

You can't read can you?


You're the dipshit who said "he listed 3 teams already ahead of them"

No he listed potential 2 loss teams.

He didn't list any 3 teams ahead of them you libtarded fuckstick. :wave2

Jesus Christ man you really need to rethink things :facepalm :suicide

How does talking about teams potentially losing 2 games prove a team is overranked?

FSUKW wrote:Here’s where we hear how tough their Big 10 Schedule is.

Big 10 is turning out to be dogshit.

Can't we do like the SEC and say they beat themselves up?

JimTrenzel wrote:

FSUKW wrote:Here’s where we hear how tough their Big 10 Schedule is.

Big 10 is turning out to be dogshit.

Can't we do like the SEC and say they beat themselves up?

Yes, as soon as you stop losing to Eastern Michigan and Northern Illinois.

CraigKressel wrote:

JdPat04 wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:

JdPat04 wrote:A 2 loss UGA, OU, and Clemson are not ranked over you.

Try again.

Do you live in some kind of fantasy land where those teams lost 2 games? What was the outcome of the 2nd loss, was it 1 point, 10 points, 30 points 100 points and who was it to?

So you are telling me if Georgia loses 80 to 0 to Kentucky they are going to be ranked ahead of Ohio State? If Clemson loses to Citadel are they going to be ranked ahead?

You can't read can you?


You're the dipshit who said "he listed 3 teams already ahead of them"

No he listed potential 2 loss teams.

He didn't list any 3 teams ahead of them you libtarded fuckstick. :wave2

Jesus Christ man you really need to rethink things :facepalm :suicide

How does talking about teams potentially losing 2 games prove a team is overranked?

For the third time dumbass.


YOU SAID HE LISTED 3 teams AHEAD OF OHSU.


Please list me the 3 teams that are ahead of ohsu that he listed?

Georgia, Clemson, Oklahoma are all ranked ahead of Ohio State and according to him if they lose again they still will be, so how exactly does this prove Ohio State is over ranked.

JimTrenzel wrote:

FSUKW wrote:Here’s where we hear how tough their Big 10 Schedule is.

Big 10 is turning out to be dogshit.

Can't we do like the SEC and say they beat themselves up?

I think you guys do. I also think the ACC does as well. It’s hard to tell with the PAC.

JdPat04 wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:

JdPat04 wrote:A 2 loss UGA, OU, and Clemson are not ranked over you.

Try again.

Do you live in some kind of fantasy land where those teams lost 2 games? What was the outcome of the 2nd loss, was it 1 point, 10 points, 30 points 100 points and who was it to?

So you are telling me if Georgia loses 80 to 0 to Kentucky they are going to be ranked ahead of Ohio State? If Clemson loses to Citadel are they going to be ranked ahead?

You can't read can you?


You're the dipshit who said "he listed 3 teams already ahead of them"

No he listed potential 2 loss teams.


He didn't list any 3 teams ahead of them you libtarded fuckstick. :wave2


PS: "what if" again.

What if you grow common sense, AGAIN

JD, lets say Miami beats Clemson by 31, Bama beats Auburn by 31 and then beats UGA by 31 in their champ game, and OU beats TCU by 31 in their champ game. Then OSU beats Illinois by 50, Michigan by 31, and Wisconsin by 31. ND loses to Stanford, to make 3 losses, USC loses to WSU or Stanford, to give them 3 losses. So now you have Bama - SEC champ zero losses, Miami - ACC champ zero losses, OU - Big12 champ 1 loss, OSU - Big10 champ 2 losses, Stanford/WSU - Pac12 champ 3 losses.

Who will be your top 4 if these things happen?

CraigKressel wrote:Georgia, Clemson, Oklahoma are all ranked ahead of Ohio State and according to him if they lose again they still will be, so how exactly does this prove Ohio State is over ranked.

He listed 2 loss OU Clemson and UGA.


So either you are counting those 3 teams or he didn't list 3 teams.

Which is it?

Clemson lost to Miami by 31

Ohsu lost to Iowa.

Clemson > ohsu

UGA lost to 2 good teams.

UGA > ohsu.

That's in your example.

Other teams are out because they have 3 losses.


You can argue that ohsu deserves to be in the playoffs and it would be a credible argument.


There's YOUR answer JT. I'll answer any serious question presented in a serious way. That other idiot though? Nah.