Moderator: JdPat04
Muck FcDisney wrote:Both have more - and better - players out than tUOS. They've also played far better competition.
Look at Maryland's injuries! :shocker
http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/
Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Both have more - and better - players out than tUOS. They've also played far better competition.
Look at Maryland's injuries! :shocker
http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/
Are you twolling or do you weally believe that? If so, then :ROFL2
Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Both have more - and better - players out than tUOS. They've also played far better competition.
Look at Maryland's injuries! :shocker
http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/
Are you twolling or do you weally believe that? If so, then :ROFL2
Is the info in the link I provided incorrect? If so, please revise. :thankyou
Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Both have more - and better - players out than tUOS. They've also played far better competition.
Look at Maryland's injuries! :shocker
http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/
Are you twolling or do you weally believe that? If so, then :ROFL2
Is the info in the link I provided incorrect? If so, please revise. :thankyou
My wesponse wasn't to your link. It was to the underlined comment. :up
Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Both have more - and better - players out than tUOS. They've also played far better competition.
Look at Maryland's injuries! :shocker
http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/
Are you twolling or do you weally believe that? If so, then :ROFL2
Is the info in the link I provided incorrect? If so, please revise. :thankyou
My wesponse wasn't to your link. It was to the underlined comment. :up
I thought 13 > 8. My bad. :dunno
JimTrenzel wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Both have more - and better - players out than tUOS. They've also played far better competition.
Look at Maryland's injuries! :shocker
http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/
Are you twolling or do you weally believe that? If so, then :ROFL2
Is the info in the link I provided incorrect? If so, please revise. :thankyou
My wesponse wasn't to your link. It was to the underlined comment. :up
I thought 13 > 8. My bad. :dunno
Thats no excuse to lose 3 games when you are supposed to be top2 in your conference. Heck FSU has 11 injured and I don't see you guys crying...
Muck FcDisney wrote:JimTrenzel wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Jimhowlett wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Both have more - and better - players out than tUOS. They've also played far better competition.
Look at Maryland's injuries! :shocker
http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/
Are you twolling or do you weally believe that? If so, then :ROFL2
Is the info in the link I provided incorrect? If so, please revise. :thankyou
My wesponse wasn't to your link. It was to the underlined comment. :up
I thought 13 > 8. My bad. :dunno
Thats no excuse to lose 3 games when you are supposed to be top2 in your conference. Heck FSU has 11 injured and I don't see you guys crying...
It hurts our depth at WR and TE, but the only major injuries are Wilder (RB) and Hunter (S). It's not like we're missing our top WR, top RB, starting QB, or best defensive player.
Gurley4Heisman wrote:Coaching and injuries are killing both teams. However, with the injuries to our studs, we could still possibly run the table with tOSU schedule. :justsayin
We definitely wouldn't have 3 losses already with that weak ass shit you call a schedule.
Gurley4Heisman wrote:Coaching and injuries are killing both teams. However, with the injuries to our studs, we could still possibly run the table with tOSU schedule. :justsayin
We definitely wouldn't have 3 losses already with that weak ass shit you call a schedule.
Gurley4Heisman wrote::biglol
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 315 guests