Moderator: JdPat04
1) +10.80000 florida_state 5-0 (1)
2) + 8.43333 missouri 5-0 (6)
3) + 8.13333 baylor 4-0 (7)
4) + 7.52000 alabama 5-0 (3)
5) + 7.04000 oregon 5-0 (4)
6) + 6.93333 clemson 5-0 (10)
7) + 6.82143 ucla 4-0 (5)
8 ) + 6.70000 washington 4-1 (2)
9) + 6.50667 stanford 5-0 (8)
10) + 6.24000 texas_tech 5-0 (9)
11) + 6.08667 texas_am 4-1 (15)
12) + 5.89333 louisville 5-0 (12)
13) + 5.76667 ohio_state 6-0 (19)
14) + 5.33333 arizona 3-1 (13)
15) + 5.07333 florida 4-1 (21)
16) + 4.97143 michigan_state 4-1 (25)
17) + 4.92222 lsu 5-1 (18)
18) + 4.92000 michigan 5-0 (41)
19) + 4.84000 miami 5-0 (33)
20) + 4.71333 oklahoma 5-0 (16)
21) + 4.39333 indiana 3-2 (38T)
22) + 4.34476 northwestern 4-1 (11)
23) + 4.28000 maryland 4-1 (14)
24) + 4.20000 brigham_young 3-2 (30)
25) + 4.10667 ecu 4-1 (28)
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:1) +10.80000 florida_state 5-0 [6] [8] [-1] ACC
2) + 8.43333 missouri 5-0 [25] [-1] [-1] SEC
3) + 8.13333 baylor 4-0 [17] [16] [-1] B12
4) + 7.52000 alabama 5-0 [1] [1] [-1] SEC
5) + 7.04000 oregon 5-0 [2] [2] [-1] PAC
6) + 6.93333 clemson 5-0 [3] [4] [-1] ACC
7) + 6.82143 ucla 4-0 [12] [13] [-1] PAC
8 ) + 6.70000 washington 4-1 [15] [18] [-1] PAC
9) + 6.50667 stanford 5-0 [5] [5] [-1] PAC
10) + 6.24000 texas_tech 5-0 [20] [22] [-1] B12
11) + 6.08667 texas_am 4-1 [9] [9] [-1] SEC
12) + 5.89333 louisville 5-0 [7] [7] [-1] AAC
13) + 5.76667 ohio_state 6-0 [4] [3] [-1] B10
14) + 5.33333 arizona 3-1 [-1] [-1] [-1] PAC
15) + 5.07333 florida 4-1 [18] [19] [-1] SEC
16) + 4.97143 michigan_state 4-1 [-1] [-1] [-1] B10
17) + 4.92222 lsu 5-1 [10] [11] [-1] SEC
18) + 4.92000 michigan 5-0 [19] [17] [-1] B10
19) + 4.84000 miami 5-0 [14] [14] [-1] ACC
20) + 4.71333 oklahoma 5-0 [11] [10] [-1] B12
21) + 4.39333 indiana 3-2 [-1] [-1] [-1] B10
22) + 4.34476 northwestern 4-1 [16] [15] [-1] B10
23) + 4.28000 maryland 4-1 [25] [-1] [-1] ACC
24) + 4.20000 brigham_young 3-2 [-1] [-1] [-1] Independent
25) + 4.10667 ecu 4-1 [-1] [-1] [-1] C-USA
Feel free to ignore the [##]. It's just there to compare to the AP, USA, and BCS polls, respectively, and most of them are from last week since USA hasn't posted theirs yet.
ScotchFrost97 wrote:sorry. we're not using this one. it has stanford behind washington. it also has missouri at 2. i'm not saying you aren't entitled to your own little ranking thing to make Florida State number 1.....but the rest is fucking stupid.
Canes_Knights wrote:Generally I'm all about including every poll that people post, but I don't now about that one. That poll looks like you forgot to carry the 1 somewhere or something.
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
73 35 1 4 Games played: 1
That game was worth 3.2.
Quality running total: 3.2.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.2
Rating: 3.2
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
35 41 3 1 Games played: 2
That game was worth -1.5.
Quality running total: 1.7.
Net score: -6
oRatio: 0.25
Rating: 0.85
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
42 10 5 1 Games played: 3
That game was worth 13.3333.
Quality running total: 15.0333.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.833333
Rating: 5.01111
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
28 45 5 0 Games played: 4
That game was worth -2.66667.
Quality running total: 12.3667.
Net score: -16
oRatio: 0.166667
Rating: 3.09167
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
44 24 3 2 Games played: 5
That game was worth 9.6.
Quality running total: 21.9667.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.6
Rating: 4.39333
F I N A L S C O R E : 4.39333
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
16 19 2 3 Games played: 1
That game was worth -1.8.
Quality running total: -1.8.
Net score: -3
oRatio: 0.6
Rating: -1.8
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
40 21 3 2 Games played: 2
That game was worth 9.6.
Quality running total: 7.8.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.6
Rating: 3.9
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
13 20 3 2 Games played: 3
That game was worth -2.8.
Quality running total: 5.
Net score: -7
oRatio: 0.4
Rating: 1.66667
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
37 10 3 3 Games played: 4
That game was worth 8.
Quality running total: 13.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.5
Rating: 3.25
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
31 14 3 3 Games played: 5
That game was worth 8.
Quality running total: 21.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.5
Rating: 4.2
F I N A L S C O R E : 4.2
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
58 14 4 2 Games played: 1
That game was worth 10.6667.
Quality running total: 10.6667.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.666667
Rating: 10.6667
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
38 23 3 3 Games played: 2
That game was worth 7.5.
Quality running total: 18.1667.
Net score: 15
oRatio: 0.5
Rating: 9.08333
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
45 28 3 2 Games played: 3
That game was worth 9.6.
Quality running total: 27.7667.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.6
Rating: 9.25556
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
41 19 2 3 Games played: 4
That game was worth 6.4.
Quality running total: 34.1667.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.4
Rating: 8.54167
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
51 28 3 3 Games played: 5
That game was worth 8.
Quality running total: 42.1667.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.5
Rating: 8.43333
F I N A L S C O R E : 8.43333
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
34 13 2 3 Games played: 1
That game was worth 6.4.
Quality running total: 6.4.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.4
Rating: 6.4
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
34 20 2 4 Games played: 2
That game was worth 4.66667.
Quality running total: 11.0667.
Net score: 14
oRatio: 0.333333
Rating: 5.53333
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
42 28 3 2 Games played: 3
That game was worth 8.4.
Quality running total: 19.4667.
Net score: 14
oRatio: 0.6
Rating: 6.48889
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
55 17 4 2 Games played: 4
That game was worth 10.6667.
Quality running total: 30.1333.
Net score: 16
oRatio: 0.666667
Rating: 7.53333
YourScore OppScore OppWins OppLosses
31 28 4 1 Games played: 5
That game was worth 2.4.
Quality running total: 32.5333.
Net score: 3
oRatio: 0.8
Rating: 6.50667
F I N A L S C O R E : 6.50667
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 260 guests