I'm voting FSU #1 in the TPR.

Canes_Knights wrote:I'm voting FSU #1 in the TPR.

:facepalm

Canes_Knights wrote:I'm voting FSU #1 in the TPR.

You're a week late. :P

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

Canes_Knights wrote:I'm voting FSU #1 in the TPR.

You're a week late. :P

Gayer than aids

EricBerry14 wrote:

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

Canes_Knights wrote:I'm voting FSU #1 in the TPR.

You're a week late. :P

Gayer than aids

Yeah, he basically admitted to being a homo... Shame. I liked SeaKay too... :facepalm

Deep down i knew he was a faggot though.

I'm sticking with
1. Bama - Till they lose, they are the champs
2. Stanford
3. Fsu
4. Clemson
5. Oregon

Oregon has zero impressive wins vs a quality opponent, so they don't deserve to be above the other four right now. Same was with Fsu but they raped a ranked team so bad my butt hurts from it.

08GatorBait wrote:I'm sticking with
1. Bama - Till they lose, they are the champs
2. Stanford
3. Fsu
4. Clemson
5. Oregon

Oregon has zero impressive wins vs a quality opponent, so they don't deserve to be above the other four right now. Same was with Fsu but they raped a ranked team so bad my butt hurts from it.

Doesnt matter clemsons win was still better than fsus

JdPat04 wrote:

08GatorBait wrote:I'm sticking with
1. Bama - Till they lose, they are the champs
2. Stanford
3. Fsu
4. Clemson
5. Oregon

Oregon has zero impressive wins vs a quality opponent, so they don't deserve to be above the other four right now. Same was with Fsu but they raped a ranked team so bad my butt hurts from it.

Doesnt matter clemsons win was still better than fsus

Agreed but Georgia also had a fumbled field goal that ties to game and FSU absolutely demolished a ranked team. Something to be said for that. Not saying anything like Clemson didn't deserve to win, but FSU is a more balanced team and their SOS is about the same I'd assume right now. Have to go with the team with the better defense, which is clearly FSU. Stanford pending beating Washington doesn't have as impressive a win either, but they have a solid win vs a ranked team and balance on both sides. The only reason Oregon is mainly moved because of their opponents is they haven't faced anyone inside the top fifty in CFB right now. Oregon may just be the best in the country, but they lack an impressive win vs a good team right now. I think that's fair...at least in my mind but I'm a homer.

What did Oregon do to Tennessee and what did Georgia do to Tennessee?


inb4 injuries and tough game the week before and wake up retards

ScotchFrost97 wrote:What did Oregon do to Tennessee and what did Georgia do to Tennessee?


inb4 injuries and tough game the week before and wake up retards

Didn't see georgia ranked ahead of oregon. So what's your poibt? We all know no huddle offenses demolish bad teams with insuperior talent. Ill wait till oregon meets a team that has talent that is comparable. Washington, ucla, Stanford all have a chance and will be impressive wins for oregon(that is if they play them). No huddle destroys cupcakes, the fast speed vs insuperior talent leaves no chance. It's why I don't buy it as an offense until done vs a good team. Oregon should do well no doubt, but say baylor? I still doubt baylor just as we should have wvu last year.

It's still impressive as hell to average 70 points through 4 games. (Baylor)

It's easy as hell when you do it vs god awful teams and snap it every fifteen seconds. Until It's done vs a good team, It's nothing. This has been proven over and over again yet people keep buying into it. It's easy to blow out bad teams with spread no huddle. They can't even remotely match up in man or zone vs that set up if they don't have talent. Yet this offense is yet to win a title, and only one has even competed for one with oregon in 2010. Auburn ran no huddle but not hurry up no huddle they took almost 30 seconds a play, same with ou in 2008. This offense is great for padding stats, and coming up short vs good teams who can tackle in space.

Outside of oregon, I really don't buy it. Oregon is good enough to face anyone, but they could do it with or without the hurry up because they have recruited and developed extremely well. Remember wvu last year, that's what baylor is this year to me, till they beat a legitimate team.

I agree with you.

08GatorBait wrote:It's easy as hell when you do it vs god awful teams and snap it every fifteen seconds. Until It's done vs a good team, It's nothing. This has been proven over and over again yet people keep buying into it. It's easy to blow out bad teams with spread no huddle. They can't even remotely match up in man or zone vs that set up if they don't have talent. Yet this offense is yet to win a title, and only one has even competed for one with oregon in 2010. Auburn ran no huddle but not hurry up no huddle they took almost 30 seconds a play, same with ou in 2008. This offense is great for padding stats, and coming up short vs good teams who can tackle in space.

Outside of oregon, I really don't buy it. Oregon is good enough to face anyone, but they could do it with or without the hurry up because they have recruited and developed extremely well. Remember wvu last year, that's what baylor is this year to me, till they beat a legitimate team.

I'm not saying they're good, but Wet Vag did beat a ranked team.

So easy fro people who cry about the up tempo offense to forget what Oregon did to Kansas ST last year, and Tennessee this year, neither team is god awful.

billys_back wrote:So easy fro people who cry about the up tempo offense to forget what Oregon did to Kansas ST last year, and Tennessee this year, neither team is god awful.

Yeah, but what'd they do to Stanford? :thought

billys_back wrote:So easy fro people who cry about the up tempo offense to forget what Oregon did to Kansas ST last year, and Tennessee this year, neither team is god awful.

tiny-c is god awful. They beat South Alabama by 7.

Last year is irrelevant.

theSabanator20 wrote:

billys_back wrote:So easy fro people who cry about the up tempo offense to forget what Oregon did to Kansas ST last year, and Tennessee this year, neither team is god awful.

Yeah, but what'd they do to Stanford? :thought

Held them, they had to win in overtime by only 3. But i will say, Chip Kelly is the reason Oregon lost that game. Same reason Oregon lost the NC, cant seem to understand why he would try and pound it up the middle the whole game. Fucking stupid.

If "Tiny-C is god awful " then what is UGA ? :thought