:thought

It'll all work itself out. If the undefeated teams keep winning.

UGA has had a tough schedule, so im cool with it

Fuck em

It is cool. You have to give credit to teams that actually beat good teams and lose a game over winning against door mats.

As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

Beaver3332 wrote:As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

I'd be fine with them ahead of Louisville

And what exactly does "end of year" mean for you

JdPat04 wrote:

Beaver3332 wrote:As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

I'd be fine with them ahead of Louisville

And what exactly does "end of year" mean for you

The only thing id have an issue with is them getting in over an undefeated from any of the 5 good conferences they deserve to be in over Louisville we agree on that much.

Beaver3332 wrote:

JdPat04 wrote:

Beaver3332 wrote:As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

I'd be fine with them ahead of Louisville

And what exactly does "end of year" mean for you

The only thing id have an issue with is them getting in over an undefeated from any of the 5 good conferences they deserve to be in over Louisville we agree on that much.

I don't really despise osu nor do I like them. I'm neutral. However if UGA went 1 loss and beat Bama in the SEC losing to an undefeated or 1 loss ACC Champ or the loss coming in the ACC champ to a 1 loss Miami or FSU team then its reasonable for them to be over osu...



But Undefeated ACC or PAC then no



I'm not sure what my feeling would be about Oklahoma.


ND isn't that great, and its not like Tejas is good or WVU is good, etc... Not sure of OUs full schedule though

Beaver3332 wrote:As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

This

Winston4Heisman wrote:

Beaver3332 wrote:As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

This

Yeah, I would be okay winning the SEC and the Natty and ranked number 2 in a poll behind like an undefeated FSU or someone else undeserving of a title shot.

Winston4Heisman wrote:

Beaver3332 wrote:As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

This

Makes no sense.....


They still would beat UF with one of the Best if not Best defenses and probably better offense than when Miami played them since Driskel is gone.

They will have had to beat Bama/LSU/or AtM.

Ga Tech :yawn

Auburn

So who should get to jump them? Who would have better wins than those?

Gurley4Heisman wrote:

Winston4Heisman wrote:

Beaver3332 wrote:As long as they don't stay ranked ahead of an undefeated at the end of the year it's cool they are the best 1 loss team and have had the toughest schedule so far.

This

Yeah, I would be okay winning the SEC and the Natty and ranked number 2 in a poll behind like an undefeated FSU or someone else undeserving of a title shot.

Yet they are saying if there are 2 losses even if its Louisville and osu (or with Beav no Louisville but lets say Oklahoma) then UGA should be 3rd

We have not played the level of compeition that UGA has so far so no problems here.

Well, since UGA has a lost, our type of luck is that FSU/CLEM/MIAMI will go undefeated, as will, UCLA/OREGON/STANFORD. So no matter what happens, if two of those six teams win out, they will be playing for the MNC...no matter how many more ranked teams UGA would have beaten..and honestly, I would have very little problem with it.

HUNKERED DOWN DAWG wrote:Well, since UGA has a lost, our type of luck is that FSU/CLEM/MIAMI will go undefeated, as will, UCLA/OREGON/STANFORD. So no matter what happens, if two of those six teams win out, they will be playing for the MNC...no matter how many more ranked teams UGA would have beaten..and honestly, I would have very little problem with it.

:alabama2

JdPat04 wrote:So who should get to jump them? Who would have better wins than those?

Anyone who didn't lose to/actually beat Clemson, you dumbass.

HUNKERED DOWN DAWG wrote:Well, since UGA has a lost, our type of luck is that FSU/CLEM/MIAMI will go undefeated, as will, UCLA/OREGON/STANFORD. So no matter what happens, if two of those six teams win out, they will be playing for the MNC...no matter how many more ranked teams UGA would have beaten..and honestly, I would have very little problem with it.

That's just it, we don't have the luck. UGA is right there every single year, but something happens that is out of our control. Last year was the first year that we actually had control of our fate and Murray being 5'10" fucked us royally... :banghead :blowup

It's on this year. Watch... We will be right there and probably smoke the SEC West champion just to be left out of the discussion because of the scenario you mentioned. Fuck this shit. 8 team playoff or BUST. The 4 team shit will be a complete joke. :facepalm

That would be funny if UGA runs the table and wins the SEC championship by beating Bama and gets left out of the BCS NC for two of the following teams: Pac 12 champ, Big 10 champ, ACC champ.

I mean, it would be funny for everyone except UGA fans and SEC coattail riders.
(and Bama fans because they lost the SEC CG)

It will happen if UGA wins the SEC. Inevitable...

However, if UGA gets a close loss in the conference title game, the west champ will get in because the football Gods just hate UGA. :lol: