TPR© Poll for Week 9

[JdPat04]

Also this is fuckespn


"I'm going to bitch about other people's ranking systems because they have weakeness's, BUT I'm gonna make my own ranking system with its own set of weakeness's"


:ays

[Citronauts_Knights]

CK, when is week nine going to be done? :toetap

Maybe this afternoon. With all the bogus polls being posted, I'm tempted to just skip it this week.

[JdPat04]

CK, when is week nine going to be done? :toetap

Maybe this afternoon. With all the bogus polls being posted, I'm tempted to just skip it this week.

Only 4.5 bogus polls we posted...


2 or 3 were purposely bogus

The other 1.5 are not, they think they're legit

[FuckESPNdotCOM]

Your MOV cap is supposedly set at 16... Everytime but once we have beat the opponent by more than 16.. The other was ATM which was 7 which isn't 1point but almost half the cap.



So where exactly hasn't Bama "capitalized" on yor shitty ass "system"


:facepalm

The reason you haven't been rated higher is because of this:

VT (6/8) * 16 = 12
TAMU (6/8) * 7 = 5.25
CSU (4/8) * 16 = 8
Miss (5/8) * 16 = 10
GSU (1/9) * 16 = 1.78
UK (1/7)* 16 = 2.29
Ark (3/8) * 16 = 6
Tenn (4/8) * 16 = 8

You add all those up (I rounded, but my program doesn't) and divide by the number of games Alabama has played, and you get their rating.
(53.32 / 8 ) = 6.665 which is nearly 6.66419 (which is the actual rating rounded to the 5th decimal place).

Alabama's schedule is what's killing them.

[gatrnation1]

CK, when is week nine going to be done? :toetap

Maybe this afternoon. With all the bogus polls being posted, I'm tempted to just skip it this week.

Just use my unbiased poll. :2thumbs :thankyou

[JdPat04]

Your MOV cap is supposedly set at 16... Everytime but once we have beat the opponent by more than 16.. The other was ATM which was 7 which isn't 1point but almost half the cap.



So where exactly hasn't Bama "capitalized" on yor shitty ass "system"


:facepalm

The reason you haven't been rated higher is because of this:

VT (6/8) * 16 = 12
TAMU (6/8) * 7 = 5.25
CSU (4/8) * 16 = 8
Miss (5/8) * 16 = 10
GSU (1/9) * 16 = 1.78
UK (1/7)* 16 = 2.29
Ark (3/8) * 16 = 6
Tenn (4/8) * 16 = 8

You add all those up (I rounded, but my program doesn't) and divide by the number of games Alabama has played, and you get their rating.
(53.32 / 8 ) = 6.665 which is nearly 6.66419 (which is the actual rating rounded to the 5th decimal place).

Alabama's schedule is what's killing them.

Yet we've been ranked low in your shit BEFORE those games, correct?

[FuckESPNdotCOM]

Yet we've been ranked low in your shit BEFORE those games, correct?

I started using this system in Week 5.
You do realize your opponents' records change every single week, right? Most teams ratings slide down as the season progresses, because teams that are 4-1 one week are 4-3 a couple weeks later (Pittsburgh for FSU). In essence, Alabama's ratings for each win change as the season goes along.

Top 25 from Week 6:

1)  +10.80000               florida_state   5-0 (1)
2)  + 8.43333                    missouri   5-0 (6)
3)  + 8.13333                      baylor   4-0 (7)
4)  + 7.52000                     alabama   5-0 (3)
5)  + 7.04000                      oregon   5-0 (4)
6)  + 6.93333                     clemson   5-0 (10)
7)  + 6.82143                        ucla   4-0 (5)
8 ) + 6.70000                  washington   4-1 (2)
9)  + 6.50667                    stanford   5-0 (8)
10) + 6.24000                  texas_tech   5-0 (9)
11) + 6.08667                    texas_am   4-1 (15)
12) + 5.89333                  louisville   5-0 (12)
13) + 5.76667                  ohio_state   6-0 (19)
14) + 5.33333                     arizona   3-1 (13)
15) + 5.07333                     florida   4-1 (21)
16) + 4.97143              michigan_state   4-1 (25)
17) + 4.92222                         lsu   5-1 (18)
18) + 4.92000                    michigan   5-0 (41)
19) + 4.84000                       miami   5-0 (33)
20) + 4.71333                    oklahoma   5-0 (16)
21) + 4.39333                     indiana   3-2 (38T)
22) + 4.34476                northwestern   4-1 (11)
23) + 4.28000                    maryland   4-1 (14)
24) + 4.20000               brigham_young   3-2 (30)
25) + 4.10667                         ecu   4-1 (28)

Previous week's ranking in parentheses.

This week's rankings:

1)  + 9.42857          florida_state   7-0 (1)
2)  + 7.28571                 oregon   8-0 (3)
3)  + 7.25670               missouri   7-1 (2)
4)  + 6.73469                 baylor   7-0 (4)
5)  + 6.66419                alabama   8-0 (5)
6)  + 6.28125             ohio_state   8-0 (6)
7)  + 5.90848               stanford   7-1 (7)
8 ) + 5.49430               texas_am   6-2 (12)
9)  + 5.31696          brigham_young   6-2 (17)
10) + 5.26563                clemson   7-1 (8)
11) + 5.13591         michigan_state   7-1 (11)
12) + 5.13095             louisville   7-1 (9)
13) + 4.82653          arizona_state   5-2 (13)
14) + 4.79387                    lsu   7-2 (14)
15) + 4.72647               michigan   6-1 (15)
16) + 4.53316                arizona   5-2 (23)
17) + 4.36607             texas_tech   7-1 (10)
18) + 4.28571               oklahoma   7-1 (19)
19) + 4.20493                houston   6-1 (26)
20) + 3.60346                  miami   7-0 (18)
21) + 3.53827         oklahoma_state   6-1 (22)
22) + 3.44345              minnesota   6-2 (37)
23) + 3.37376             washington   5-3 (20)
24) + 3.30385              wisconsin   5-2 (21)
25) + 3.26020           fresno_state   7-0 (24)

If you can't see the why the ratings are the way they are, I really can't help you. This is really simple logic and math.

[JdPat04]

Yet we've been ranked low in your shit BEFORE those games, correct?

I started using this system in Week 5.
You do realize your opponents' records change every single week, right? Most teams ratings slide down as the season progresses, because teams that are 4-1 one week are 4-3 a couple weeks later (Pittsburgh for FSU). In essence, Alabama's ratings for each win change as the season goes along.

Top 25 from Week 6:

1)  +10.80000               florida_state   5-0 (1)
2)  + 8.43333                    missouri   5-0 (6)
3)  + 8.13333                      baylor   4-0 (7)
4)  + 7.52000                     alabama   5-0 (3)
5)  + 7.04000                      oregon   5-0 (4)
6)  + 6.93333                     clemson   5-0 (10)
7)  + 6.82143                        ucla   4-0 (5)
8 ) + 6.70000                  washington   4-1 (2)
9)  + 6.50667                    stanford   5-0 (8)
10) + 6.24000                  texas_tech   5-0 (9)
11) + 6.08667                    texas_am   4-1 (15)
12) + 5.89333                  louisville   5-0 (12)
13) + 5.76667                  ohio_state   6-0 (19)
14) + 5.33333                     arizona   3-1 (13)
15) + 5.07333                     florida   4-1 (21)
16) + 4.97143              michigan_state   4-1 (25)
17) + 4.92222                         lsu   5-1 (18)
18) + 4.92000                    michigan   5-0 (41)
19) + 4.84000                       miami   5-0 (33)
20) + 4.71333                    oklahoma   5-0 (16)
21) + 4.39333                     indiana   3-2 (38T)
22) + 4.34476                northwestern   4-1 (11)
23) + 4.28000                    maryland   4-1 (14)
24) + 4.20000               brigham_young   3-2 (30)
25) + 4.10667                         ecu   4-1 (28)

Previous week's ranking in parentheses.

This week's rankings:

1)  + 9.42857          florida_state   7-0 (1)
2)  + 7.28571                 oregon   8-0 (3)
3)  + 7.25670               missouri   7-1 (2)
4)  + 6.73469                 baylor   7-0 (4)
5)  + 6.66419                alabama   8-0 (5)
6)  + 6.28125             ohio_state   8-0 (6)
7)  + 5.90848               stanford   7-1 (7)
8 ) + 5.49430               texas_am   6-2 (12)
9)  + 5.31696          brigham_young   6-2 (17)
10) + 5.26563                clemson   7-1 (8)
11) + 5.13591         michigan_state   7-1 (11)
12) + 5.13095             louisville   7-1 (9)
13) + 4.82653          arizona_state   5-2 (13)
14) + 4.79387                    lsu   7-2 (14)
15) + 4.72647               michigan   6-1 (15)
16) + 4.53316                arizona   5-2 (23)
17) + 4.36607             texas_tech   7-1 (10)
18) + 4.28571               oklahoma   7-1 (19)
19) + 4.20493                houston   6-1 (26)
20) + 3.60346                  miami   7-0 (18)
21) + 3.53827         oklahoma_state   6-1 (22)
22) + 3.44345              minnesota   6-2 (37)
23) + 3.37376             washington   5-3 (20)
24) + 3.30385              wisconsin   5-2 (21)
25) + 3.26020           fresno_state   7-0 (24)

If you can't see the why the ratings are the way they are, I really can't help you. This is really simple logic and math.

For the love of God! We see your fucking numbers and little symbols FFS!


However we think they're retarded!


You give FSU credit for having BC being 6-1 FFS if ga st, or Kentucky played BC's schedule they'd be 6-1


You don't give the same credit (basically bonus for scheduling FCS teams ) and then expect people to take your rankings seriously.


You probably give FSU more points for beating BC by 16+ than you do Bama fir beating ATM by 7

[theSabanator20]

CK, when is week nine going to be done? :toetap

Maybe this afternoon. With all the bogus polls being posted, I'm tempted to just skip it this week.

At least use mine :yes its reasonable with no bullshit :dog

[gatrnation1]

Yet we've been ranked low in your shit BEFORE those games, correct?

I started using this system in Week 5.
You do realize your opponents' records change every single week, right? Most teams ratings slide down as the season progresses, because teams that are 4-1 one week are 4-3 a couple weeks later (Pittsburgh for FSU). In essence, Alabama's ratings for each win change as the season goes along.

Top 25 from Week 6:

1)  +10.80000               florida_state   5-0 (1)
2)  + 8.43333                    missouri   5-0 (6)
3)  + 8.13333                      baylor   4-0 (7)
4)  + 7.52000                     alabama   5-0 (3)
5)  + 7.04000                      oregon   5-0 (4)
6)  + 6.93333                     clemson   5-0 (10)
7)  + 6.82143                        ucla   4-0 (5)
8 ) + 6.70000                  washington   4-1 (2)
9)  + 6.50667                    stanford   5-0 (8)
10) + 6.24000                  texas_tech   5-0 (9)
11) + 6.08667                    texas_am   4-1 (15)
12) + 5.89333                  louisville   5-0 (12)
13) + 5.76667                  ohio_state   6-0 (19)
14) + 5.33333                     arizona   3-1 (13)
15) + 5.07333                     florida   4-1 (21)
16) + 4.97143              michigan_state   4-1 (25)
17) + 4.92222                         lsu   5-1 (18)
18) + 4.92000                    michigan   5-0 (41)
19) + 4.84000                       miami   5-0 (33)
20) + 4.71333                    oklahoma   5-0 (16)
21) + 4.39333                     indiana   3-2 (38T)
22) + 4.34476                northwestern   4-1 (11)
23) + 4.28000                    maryland   4-1 (14)
24) + 4.20000               brigham_young   3-2 (30)
25) + 4.10667                         ecu   4-1 (28)

Previous week's ranking in parentheses.

This week's rankings:

1)  + 9.42857          florida_state   7-0 (1)
2)  + 7.28571                 oregon   8-0 (3)
3)  + 7.25670               missouri   7-1 (2)
4)  + 6.73469                 baylor   7-0 (4)
5)  + 6.66419                alabama   8-0 (5)
6)  + 6.28125             ohio_state   8-0 (6)
7)  + 5.90848               stanford   7-1 (7)
8 ) + 5.49430               texas_am   6-2 (12)
9)  + 5.31696          brigham_young   6-2 (17)
10) + 5.26563                clemson   7-1 (8)
11) + 5.13591         michigan_state   7-1 (11)
12) + 5.13095             louisville   7-1 (9)
13) + 4.82653          arizona_state   5-2 (13)
14) + 4.79387                    lsu   7-2 (14)
15) + 4.72647               michigan   6-1 (15)
16) + 4.53316                arizona   5-2 (23)
17) + 4.36607             texas_tech   7-1 (10)
18) + 4.28571               oklahoma   7-1 (19)
19) + 4.20493                houston   6-1 (26)
20) + 3.60346                  miami   7-0 (18)
21) + 3.53827         oklahoma_state   6-1 (22)
22) + 3.44345              minnesota   6-2 (37)
23) + 3.37376             washington   5-3 (20)
24) + 3.30385              wisconsin   5-2 (21)
25) + 3.26020           fresno_state   7-0 (24)

If you can't see the why the ratings are the way they are, I really can't help you. This is really simple logic and math.

gheypee is getting destroyed in this thread. :owned

[JdPat04]

Yet we've been ranked low in your shit BEFORE those games, correct?

I started using this system in Week 5.
You do realize your opponents' records change every single week, right? Most teams ratings slide down as the season progresses, because teams that are 4-1 one week are 4-3 a couple weeks later (Pittsburgh for FSU). In essence, Alabama's ratings for each win change as the season goes along.

Top 25 from Week 6:

1)  +10.80000               florida_state   5-0 (1)
2)  + 8.43333                    missouri   5-0 (6)
3)  + 8.13333                      baylor   4-0 (7)
4)  + 7.52000                     alabama   5-0 (3)
5)  + 7.04000                      oregon   5-0 (4)
6)  + 6.93333                     clemson   5-0 (10)
7)  + 6.82143                        ucla   4-0 (5)
8 ) + 6.70000                  washington   4-1 (2)
9)  + 6.50667                    stanford   5-0 (8)
10) + 6.24000                  texas_tech   5-0 (9)
11) + 6.08667                    texas_am   4-1 (15)
12) + 5.89333                  louisville   5-0 (12)
13) + 5.76667                  ohio_state   6-0 (19)
14) + 5.33333                     arizona   3-1 (13)
15) + 5.07333                     florida   4-1 (21)
16) + 4.97143              michigan_state   4-1 (25)
17) + 4.92222                         lsu   5-1 (18)
18) + 4.92000                    michigan   5-0 (41)
19) + 4.84000                       miami   5-0 (33)
20) + 4.71333                    oklahoma   5-0 (16)
21) + 4.39333                     indiana   3-2 (38T)
22) + 4.34476                northwestern   4-1 (11)
23) + 4.28000                    maryland   4-1 (14)
24) + 4.20000               brigham_young   3-2 (30)
25) + 4.10667                         ecu   4-1 (28)

Previous week's ranking in parentheses.

This week's rankings:

1)  + 9.42857          florida_state   7-0 (1)
2)  + 7.28571                 oregon   8-0 (3)
3)  + 7.25670               missouri   7-1 (2)
4)  + 6.73469                 baylor   7-0 (4)
5)  + 6.66419                alabama   8-0 (5)
6)  + 6.28125             ohio_state   8-0 (6)
7)  + 5.90848               stanford   7-1 (7)
8 ) + 5.49430               texas_am   6-2 (12)
9)  + 5.31696          brigham_young   6-2 (17)
10) + 5.26563                clemson   7-1 (8)
11) + 5.13591         michigan_state   7-1 (11)
12) + 5.13095             louisville   7-1 (9)
13) + 4.82653          arizona_state   5-2 (13)
14) + 4.79387                    lsu   7-2 (14)
15) + 4.72647               michigan   6-1 (15)
16) + 4.53316                arizona   5-2 (23)
17) + 4.36607             texas_tech   7-1 (10)
18) + 4.28571               oklahoma   7-1 (19)
19) + 4.20493                houston   6-1 (26)
20) + 3.60346                  miami   7-0 (18)
21) + 3.53827         oklahoma_state   6-1 (22)
22) + 3.44345              minnesota   6-2 (37)
23) + 3.37376             washington   5-3 (20)
24) + 3.30385              wisconsin   5-2 (21)
25) + 3.26020           fresno_state   7-0 (24)

If you can't see the why the ratings are the way they are, I really can't help you. This is really simple logic and math.

gheypee is getting destroyed in this thread. :owned

I'm not the one with Mizzou ranked ahead of Bama...

[FuckESPNdotCOM]

I changed my rankings and tweaked how FCS wins are calculated. Bama is up at #2. JdPat04 will still be butthurt about it.

[Beaver3332]

I changed my rankings and tweaked how FCS wins are calculated. Bama is up at #2. JdPat04 will still be butthurt about it.

That should definitely help the FCS shit was stupid.

[Muck FcDisney]

I changed my rankings and tweaked how FCS wins are calculated. Bama is up at #2. JdPat04 will still be butthurt about it.

That should definitely help the FCS shit was stupid.

:word

[JdPat04]

I changed my rankings and tweaked how FCS wins are calculated. Bama is up at #2. JdPat04 will still be butthurt about it.

Can u show me where I've said anything legit about FSU or Oregon being ranked ahead of Bama especially from their own fans??

If I was a Nole I'd rank them 1 and Bama 2 and Oregon 3 so I have no problem with what I just saw although I only looked at the top 2

[JdPat04]

Way better I of course still disagree with Miami and auburn

Then byu is too high

[ericberry14]

Mine was legit

[Citronauts_Knights]

Polls are compiled. Destickying