FAQ


Previous topic | Next topic
Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ]
Post new topic Post a reply
Print view

Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
February 20th, 2014, 1:37 am Post
If the playoffs started today the east would put 4 sub .500 teams into the playoffs. :thought
Last post


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Site Admin
Profile 
February 20th, 2014, 1:59 pm Post
And still win the whole thing

But no thy shouldn't have 8. Have 6 with 2 teams getting a bye


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
February 20th, 2014, 4:27 pm Post
ericberry14 wrote
And still win the whole thing

But no thy shouldn't have 8. Have 6 with 2 teams getting a bye

:2thumbs


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
February 27th, 2014, 5:01 pm Post
honestly i would like this

however its never going to happen


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
March 3rd, 2014, 9:01 pm Post
NBA just needs to shutdown already


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
March 3rd, 2014, 9:08 pm Post
Winston4Heisman wrote
NBA just needs to shutdown already

Pretty much.

narrow the league to 6 teams and never expand.


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
March 5th, 2014, 3:40 am Post
ESPN heads talking about this today. Hell I'm ahead of the curve ,this should happen.And set a bracket so we can so we can bet like NCAA. :yes


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - 2013 TSH Fantasy Football Champion
Profile 
March 27th, 2014, 5:52 pm Post
Or eliminate divisions and conferences & seed it openly. The best 16 records make the playoffs & are seeded by record


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
March 27th, 2014, 9:35 pm Post
Just let every team into the playoffs...bottom 16 seeds have to win 3 games in a row to advance, if they lose once before that time they are out :yes


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Site Admin
Profile 
May 7th, 2014, 5:11 pm Post
they should just have a player vote on the top 16 teams that LeBron James doesn't play on to see which team LeBron plays in the finals.


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
May 8th, 2014, 4:25 am Post
ScotchFrost97 wrote
Or eliminate divisions and conferences & seed it openly. The best 16 records make the playoffs & are seeded by record

Not terrible but no divisions means no rivalries.


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - 2013 TSH Fantasy Football Champion
Profile 
May 11th, 2014, 11:26 pm Post
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote
ScotchFrost97 wrote
Or eliminate divisions and conferences & seed it openly. The best 16 records make the playoffs & are seeded by record

Not terrible but no divisions means no rivalries.

You could have designated rivalries


Re: Should NBA take the best 16 teams ?

Offline - Profile 
January 22nd, 2015, 1:56 pm Post
8 teams is way too many teams anyway. It makes the regular season almost irrelevant. They should take the baseball route:

3 Division Leaders in each conference plus 2 Wild Cards with a play-in. The wild card play-in should be a best of 3 though.

That would put in Atlanta, Toronto and Chicago, with Cleveland and Washington having a play-in based on current standings. Each of those teams deserves to be in. It would such to be the Clippers in this scenario though.
Top

Post new topic  Post a reply

Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ]
Previous topic | Next topic

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests










Jump to