Page 1 of 1

ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 4:44 pm
by MIAMIDOMINATION
complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 6:50 pm
by RjunCajun
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 6:54 pm
by MIAMIDOMINATION
RjunCajun wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm

this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 6:56 pm
by frazier9495
The hit is awesome to watch. His whole body moves while his head stays in place on initial impact. :lol:

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 7:00 pm
by ericberry14
what was the reason for the flag? cuz I saw none

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 7:17 pm
by RjunCajun
The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm
by ericberry14
what was the "penalty"?

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm
by ericberry14
so far this year unnecessary roughness calls are up 34% from last year and 59% from 2009

They are going to start calling "excessive force" for hits on QBs and WRs :biglol

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 7:45 pm
by Muck FcDisney
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
RjunCajun wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm

this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit


:word

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 8:19 pm
by MIAMIDOMINATION
RjunCajun wrote:The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 8:20 pm
by Carr2Cooper
MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 8:25 pm
by RjunCajun
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
RjunCajun wrote:The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him



I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty.

I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control.

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 8:26 pm
by MIAMIDOMINATION
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 8:28 pm
by Carr2Cooper
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 8:34 pm
by MIAMIDOMINATION
Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 20th, 2013, 8:39 pm
by ericberry14
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 21st, 2013, 12:17 am
by Carr2Cooper
EricBerry14 wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?

No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 21st, 2013, 12:43 am
by semperfi4727
RjunCajun wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
RjunCajun wrote:The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him



I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty.

I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control.

That was mortenson and he said that on sportscenter too. But what a fag call. I though it was just the refs wanting to march with the aints, but the nfl fined him too :wtf

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

PostPosted: November 21st, 2013, 1:23 am
by ericberry14
Winston4Heisman wrote:
EricBerry14 wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?

No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow

Without their starting qb?