ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Moderator: JdPat04

ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby MIAMIDOMINATION » November 20th, 2013, 4:44 pm

complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call
MIAMIDOMINATION
 
Posts: 73868
Joined: February 6th, 2009, 6:47 pm
Location: Baton Rouge LA , Tallahassee FL
Team Logo:
Boston Red Sox
Has thanked: 1382 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby RjunCajun » November 20th, 2013, 6:50 pm

MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm
RjunCajun
 
Posts: 12604
Joined: February 19th, 2008, 3:44 am
Location: URGRLSHNYPOT, USA
Team Logo:
LSU Tigers
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby MIAMIDOMINATION » November 20th, 2013, 6:54 pm

RjunCajun wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm

this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit
MIAMIDOMINATION
 
Posts: 73868
Joined: February 6th, 2009, 6:47 pm
Location: Baton Rouge LA , Tallahassee FL
Team Logo:
Boston Red Sox
Has thanked: 1382 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby frazier9495 » November 20th, 2013, 6:56 pm

The hit is awesome to watch. His whole body moves while his head stays in place on initial impact. :lol:
frazier9495
 
Posts: 111114
Joined: February 12th, 2008, 9:14 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Team Logo:
Nebraska Cornhuskers
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby ericberry14 » November 20th, 2013, 7:00 pm

what was the reason for the flag? cuz I saw none
ericberry14
Site Admin
 
Posts: 40901
Joined: October 28th, 2008, 10:18 pm
Location: Memphis
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 451 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby RjunCajun » November 20th, 2013, 7:17 pm

The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes
RjunCajun
 
Posts: 12604
Joined: February 19th, 2008, 3:44 am
Location: URGRLSHNYPOT, USA
Team Logo:
LSU Tigers
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby ericberry14 » November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm

what was the "penalty"?
ericberry14
Site Admin
 
Posts: 40901
Joined: October 28th, 2008, 10:18 pm
Location: Memphis
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 451 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby ericberry14 » November 20th, 2013, 7:20 pm

so far this year unnecessary roughness calls are up 34% from last year and 59% from 2009

They are going to start calling "excessive force" for hits on QBs and WRs :biglol
ericberry14
Site Admin
 
Posts: 40901
Joined: October 28th, 2008, 10:18 pm
Location: Memphis
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 451 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby Muck FcDisney » November 20th, 2013, 7:45 pm

MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
RjunCajun wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:complete bullshit, the saints were given the victory by the refs because of a bullshit call



:facepalm

this is pussyfication of football, that was a clean hit


:word
Muck FcDisney
 
Posts: 65406
Joined: June 20th, 2008, 12:18 am
Location: Scatlanta
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 346 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby MIAMIDOMINATION » November 20th, 2013, 8:19 pm

RjunCajun wrote:The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him
MIAMIDOMINATION
 
Posts: 73868
Joined: February 6th, 2009, 6:47 pm
Location: Baton Rouge LA , Tallahassee FL
Team Logo:
Boston Red Sox
Has thanked: 1382 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby Carr2Cooper » November 20th, 2013, 8:20 pm

MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought
Carr2Cooper
 
Posts: 50510
Joined: January 29th, 2009, 11:37 pm
Location: The year 2505
Team Logo:
South Alabama Jaguars
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby RjunCajun » November 20th, 2013, 8:25 pm

MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
RjunCajun wrote:The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him



I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty.

I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control.
RjunCajun
 
Posts: 12604
Joined: February 19th, 2008, 3:44 am
Location: URGRLSHNYPOT, USA
Team Logo:
LSU Tigers
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby MIAMIDOMINATION » November 20th, 2013, 8:26 pm

Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd
MIAMIDOMINATION
 
Posts: 73868
Joined: February 6th, 2009, 6:47 pm
Location: Baton Rouge LA , Tallahassee FL
Team Logo:
Boston Red Sox
Has thanked: 1382 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby Carr2Cooper » November 20th, 2013, 8:28 pm

MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting
Carr2Cooper
 
Posts: 50510
Joined: January 29th, 2009, 11:37 pm
Location: The year 2505
Team Logo:
South Alabama Jaguars
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby MIAMIDOMINATION » November 20th, 2013, 8:34 pm

Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game
MIAMIDOMINATION
 
Posts: 73868
Joined: February 6th, 2009, 6:47 pm
Location: Baton Rouge LA , Tallahassee FL
Team Logo:
Boston Red Sox
Has thanked: 1382 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby ericberry14 » November 20th, 2013, 8:39 pm

MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?
ericberry14
Site Admin
 
Posts: 40901
Joined: October 28th, 2008, 10:18 pm
Location: Memphis
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 451 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby Carr2Cooper » November 21st, 2013, 12:17 am

EricBerry14 wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?

No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow
Carr2Cooper
 
Posts: 50510
Joined: January 29th, 2009, 11:37 pm
Location: The year 2505
Team Logo:
South Alabama Jaguars
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby semperfi4727 » November 21st, 2013, 12:43 am

RjunCajun wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
RjunCajun wrote:The Saints have been flagged for far lesser hits :yes

he did nothing wrong, there was no helmet to helmet contact all he did was tackle him



I was listening to Dan Patrick this morning and someone (some supposed expert) said that the reason the flag was thrown was that despite the hit starting chest high, the fact that the tackle ended up being by high neck (which it ended up being) is what caused the penalty.

I like the fact that we benefited from the penalty, however, I just goes to show, you cannot go about hitting a QB with the intent of laying a BIG hit. Way to hard to control.

That was mortenson and he said that on sportscenter too. But what a fag call. I though it was just the refs wanting to march with the aints, but the nfl fined him too :wtf
semperfi4727
 
Posts: 4682
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 9:26 pm
Team Logo:
Georgia Bulldogs
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: ahmad brooks sack/strip of drew brees

Postby ericberry14 » November 21st, 2013, 1:23 am

Winston4Heisman wrote:
EricBerry14 wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:
MIAMIDOMINATION wrote:
Winston4Heisman wrote:MD bitches about his team getting fucked but when I bring up the Tuck Rule he says I'm whining for no reason :thought

i never said the tuck rule was legit bro

i was opposed to it when it happened and im opposed to it now

i was giving you a hard time you nerd


Kind of like I'm doing to you now :thought Interdasting

for whatever reason the NFL wanted new england to win that game

Weren't they the underdog back then?

No...They were 11-5 against a 10-6 while playing at home in the snow

Without their starting qb?
ericberry14
Site Admin
 
Posts: 40901
Joined: October 28th, 2008, 10:18 pm
Location: Memphis
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 451 times
Been thanked: 598 times


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests