I like call of duty more. The gun play is far, far better in cod. The vehicles are cool and It's more realistic, but in the end It's a gun game. Cod has much better gun play. Better frame rates, better maps for gun battles(Bf is made for long games, cod for short and quick gun play). Bf is fun and I'll keep it, but I'm still more into cod.

08GatorBait wrote:I like call of duty more. The gun play is far, far better in cod. The vehicles are cool and It's more realistic, but in the end It's a gun game. Cod has much better gun play. Better frame rates, better maps for gun battles(Bf is made for long games, cod for short and quick gun play). Bf is fun and I'll keep it, but I'm still more into cod.

Battlefield is for people who can't cut it on call of duty. I threw on some modern warfare 3 last night though and it is soooo fucking annoying. They need to write a fix so people can't quick scope. Either have a match type with no sniper rifles or cut their damage in half if they are at a certain distance... It's the most pussy shit of my life and it never happened on black ops.

But yeah battlefield is for people who can't fight up close and can't figure out how to be a quick scoping faggot

Both of these franchises are fucking garbage.

Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:Both of these franchises are fucking garbage.

This doesn't help.

Playing zombies reminds me of playing NCAA football sometimes. Having to weave in and out of all those fucks.
Sitting in the passenger seat of a chopper shooting the shit out of poor fucks on the ground may get you lots of points but it gets boring

If you have more fun shooting zombies playing these shitty games then you know they're boring.

I play zombies as a come down after playing intense fast paced shit on cod


Go back to the lax thread though I bet you like my last post :lol:

:ROFL2

Yeah I bought the stupid bf game again thinking this time it would be different, but :no I will give it a try again when the ps4 comes out and they have 64 people in a map...maybe then it won't be so boring since the map size to people ratio will be a bit more even.

frazier9495 wrote:Yeah I bought the stupid bf game again thinking this time it would be different, but :no I will give it a try again when the ps4 comes out and they have 64 people in a map...maybe then it won't be so boring since the map size to people ratio will be a bit more even.

Battlefield2 was the shit.. Not bad company 2 but the original battlefield games. I think it went 1942 then battlefield2 but it was on PC and awesome... To me at the time. Maps were 64 v 64 not even 64 total so that made it awesome. Sniping actually made sense and it was easy to stay hidden from tanks and shit and still kill. But... I also sucked at shooter back then so I either sniped or nube tubed but I figured out how to get high ass scores. On servers where you couldn't kill yourself or teammates with explosives id just take a dune buggy right into their base and shoot nube tubes straight down while I was standing next to them :biglol I'd get first place with 100+ kills with regularity. Shit was hilarious

frazier9495 wrote:Yeah I bought the stupid bf game again thinking this time it would be different, but :no I will give it a try again when the ps4 comes out and they have 64 people in a map...maybe then it won't be so boring since the map size to people ratio will be a bit more even.

You got sold this game by a used car dealer :dog

Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:

frazier9495 wrote:Yeah I bought the stupid bf game again thinking this time it would be different, but :no I will give it a try again when the ps4 comes out and they have 64 people in a map...maybe then it won't be so boring since the map size to people ratio will be a bit more even.

You got sold this game by a used car dealer :dog

:biglol

Yeah I didn't like BF3 so I'm not going to get 4 unless I hear awesome things from friends (not 20). The graphics were great and I loved that you could operate vehicles, but I just couldn't get into it. The layout and the way the online games are is just confusing and I don't like it. :lol:

I'll stick with COD. But I'm in no hurry to get ghosts. It's, for the most part, the same recycled shit over and over again...not worth $60 and waiting a week just to get online. :no

Agreed. To be honest it's not really hard to be good with the guns in this game. I'm having no issue going 20-10 each no vehicle map. Maps are so big all you have to do is literally go around everyone then come back and you kill 2-3 before anyone knows you're there. COD to get behind them you have to know the maps very well and get a little lucky. The sniper is weird in this game but I hate sniping anyways so I actually like that. It took me a long time playing COD to get good at the game...drop shoting, quick scoping, etc..all took time learning. BF outside of learning the vehicles I don't see anyone doing anything special...so apparently my KD will be over 2 if I just play gun games(to bad there are only three total to play ;/. )

Oh and EB. Ghost has a delay on the sniper and the pull up on the scope is actually off somewhat. I watched one of the faze members play and he couldn't quick scope. He still sniped well but it isn't like MW3 where it's just pop and bam. He had to fully draw out the scope then move it. Can't drag scope any more.

08GatorBait wrote:Oh and EB. Ghost has a delay on the sniper and the pull up on the scope is actually off somewhat. I watched one of the faze members play and he couldn't quick scope. He still sniped well but it isn't like MW3 where it's just pop and bam. He had to fully draw out the scope then move it. Can't drag scope any more.

Thank god. I played like 3 hours of mw3 and couldn't fucking believe it. Playing drop zone I would win every time but go 17-34 cuz of "snipers"

I would watch the kill cam too and it's complete horse shit. Black ops has nothing even close to That shit and they have legit players too

Yup snipers fucking ruined MW3 for me. What a waste of money...I've probably played that game for maybe a total of 20 hours, and I got it on release day.

FSUseminoles91 wrote:Yup snipers fucking ruined MW3 for me. What a waste of money...I've probably played that game for maybe a total of 20 hours, and I got it on release day.

I just played it for the first time online seriously 2 days ago and :wtf it is fucking ridiculously terrible. I over exaggerate sometimes but this is the worst shit ever when it comes to shooters. Auto assist quick scoping?

EricBerry14 wrote:

FSUseminoles91 wrote:Yup snipers fucking ruined MW3 for me. What a waste of money...I've probably played that game for maybe a total of 20 hours, and I got it on release day.

I just played it for the first time online seriously 2 days ago and :wtf it is fucking ridiculously terrible. I over exaggerate sometimes but this is the worst shit ever when it comes to shooters. Auto assist quick scoping?

I don't like infinity ward. All of their COD's suck ass. Which is why I'm in no hurry to get Ghosts.

Treyarch is way better.

If you get owned by quick scopers you just suck at the game :sorry

frazier9495 wrote:If you get owned by quick scopers you just suck at the game :sorry

black ops 2 they aren't an issue I can handle those kids all day.

MW3 though they never get hit markers and it's a little ridiculous. You can't stop them in MW3.

Black ops took more time to get the scope up and the snipers had a smaller window to hit for one hit kill. Only thing I recommend if dealing with them in BO2 is to never aim down scope vs them, always just spray and move and halo jump to make them get leg shots not body shots. I like to move near cover on them too its almost impossible to get a quick on a guy with just his head out, if they get it they are damn good and you're fucked.