2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Moderator: JdPat04

2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby FuckESPNdotCOM » April 14th, 2023, 12:59 am

Jack Teixeira, member of the National Guard and gun fruitcake, was arrested in Massachusetts for being stupid enough to leak documents on Discord [1]. It wasn't "supposed" to be a leak, I guess. :ays

Supposedly he was a member of "Thug Shaker Central" which took its name from a clip from a gay porn flick [2]. :facepalm2

We spend billions of dollars a year on these stupid, gun-loving faggots? :homo :chaingun


1: https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/04/ ... group.html
2: https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/national- ... tel-leaks/
FuckESPNdotCOM
 
Posts: 10665
Joined: November 28th, 2012, 6:53 pm
Location: Vengeance
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 144 times
Been thanked: 186 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby bigbluebazooka » April 14th, 2023, 6:08 pm

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Jack Teixeira, member of the National Guard and gun fruitcake, was arrested in Massachusetts for being stupid enough to leak documents on Discord [1]. It wasn't "supposed" to be a leak, I guess. :ays

Supposedly he was a member of "Thug Shaker Central" which took its name from a clip from a gay porn flick [2]. :facepalm2

We spend billions of dollars a year on these stupid, gun-loving faggots? :homo :chaingun


1: https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/04/ ... group.html
2: https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/national- ... tel-leaks/

Is this what government funded media is telling you? Because non government funded media is telling me a different story. :justsayin
bigbluebazooka
 
Posts: 8869
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 1:18 am
Team Logo:
Miami Hurricanes
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 331 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby ericberry14 » April 14th, 2023, 7:35 pm

bigbluebazooka wrote:
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Jack Teixeira, member of the National Guard and gun fruitcake, was arrested in Massachusetts for being stupid enough to leak documents on Discord [1]. It wasn't "supposed" to be a leak, I guess. :ays

Supposedly he was a member of "Thug Shaker Central" which took its name from a clip from a gay porn flick [2]. :facepalm2

We spend billions of dollars a year on these stupid, gun-loving faggots? :homo :chaingun


1: https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/04/ ... group.html
2: https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/national- ... tel-leaks/

Is this what government funded media is telling you? Because non government funded media is telling me a different story. :justsayin


By government funded do you mean big pharma? :lol:
ericberry14
Site Admin
 
Posts: 40903
Joined: October 28th, 2008, 10:18 pm
Location: Memphis
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 451 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby bigbluebazooka » April 14th, 2023, 10:38 pm

ericberry14 wrote:
bigbluebazooka wrote:
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Jack Teixeira, member of the National Guard and gun fruitcake, was arrested in Massachusetts for being stupid enough to leak documents on Discord [1]. It wasn't "supposed" to be a leak, I guess. :ays

Supposedly he was a member of "Thug Shaker Central" which took its name from a clip from a gay porn flick [2]. :facepalm2

We spend billions of dollars a year on these stupid, gun-loving faggots? :homo :chaingun


1: https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/04/ ... group.html
2: https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/national- ... tel-leaks/

Is this what government funded media is telling you? Because non government funded media is telling me a different story. :justsayin


By government funded do you mean big pharma? :lol:

Unfortunately it’s tax paid media to support the liberal agenda. And us tax payers pay these fucks to brainwash stupid liberals to destroy our country.
bigbluebazooka
 
Posts: 8869
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 1:18 am
Team Logo:
Miami Hurricanes
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 331 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby FuckESPNdotCOM » April 15th, 2023, 11:55 pm

bigbluebazooka wrote:
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Jack Teixeira, member of the National Guard and gun fruitcake, was arrested in Massachusetts for being stupid enough to leak documents on Discord [1]. It wasn't "supposed" to be a leak, I guess. :ays

Supposedly he was a member of "Thug Shaker Central" which took its name from a clip from a gay porn flick [2]. :facepalm2

We spend billions of dollars a year on these stupid, gun-loving faggots? :homo :chaingun


1: https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/04/ ... group.html
2: https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/national- ... tel-leaks/

Is this what government funded media is telling you? Because non government funded media is telling me a different story. :justsayin

government-funded*
non-government-funded*

The second part is to be taken with a grain of salt, hence starting it with "supposedly."

The sources are right there. Are you unable to figure out simple citations?
FuckESPNdotCOM
 
Posts: 10665
Joined: November 28th, 2012, 6:53 pm
Location: Vengeance
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 144 times
Been thanked: 186 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby bigbluebazooka » April 16th, 2023, 1:48 am

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:
bigbluebazooka wrote:
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Jack Teixeira, member of the National Guard and gun fruitcake, was arrested in Massachusetts for being stupid enough to leak documents on Discord [1]. It wasn't "supposed" to be a leak, I guess. :ays

Supposedly he was a member of "Thug Shaker Central" which took its name from a clip from a gay porn flick [2]. :facepalm2

We spend billions of dollars a year on these stupid, gun-loving faggots? :homo :chaingun


1: https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/04/ ... group.html
2: https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/national- ... tel-leaks/

Is this what government funded media is telling you? Because non government funded media is telling me a different story. :justsayin

government-funded*
non-government-funded*

The second part is to be taken with a grain of salt, hence starting it with "supposedly."

The sources are right there. Are you unable to figure out simple citations?

Spoiler:
Deflection alert


Enjoy your government funded media. :2thumbs
bigbluebazooka
 
Posts: 8869
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 1:18 am
Team Logo:
Miami Hurricanes
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 331 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby Muck FcDisney » April 17th, 2023, 7:54 pm

Man, being a propagandist is just too easy these days.

The real story here is:
- The US inflated Russian casualties
- The US downplayed Ukrainian casualties
- Outlook not as rosy as propagandists told you
- Zelensky ordering attacks inside Russia
- Presence of US/NATO special forces in Ukraine
- US spying on top Ukraine officials and other allies...again (Obama was busted for this, of course)
- Ukraine attacking Belarus

All shocking, I know. :dog

Propagandists initially used the tried and true lie (Russian disinformation) for the 1000th time prior to being exposed as liars again:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russia ... 023-04-07/

Remember when they told you Russia blew up it's own pipeline? :ROFL
Remember when Biden said "the likelihood there's going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country [of Afghanistan] is highly unlikely."? :ROFL2

I could go on forever. Back on topic.

Remember those 4 years when leakers were defended, and were considered heroes and patriots.. even when the leaks were know by both the leakers and the media to be lies (see Russian collusion conspiracy theory, Russian bounties conspiracy theory, Rebekah Jones conspiracy theory, etc, etc ,etc)? Seems so long ago now. And that was just after Obama prosecuted more leakers than every other president... combined. Weird how that works, huh? One day they're traitors, and the next (when a new president assumes office) they're heroes. Exactly 4 years later, they become traitors again overnight. :thought

So state media just says "leaker man bad" and 90% of the county forgets the real story? Retards.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:We spend billions of dollars a year on these stupid, gun-loving faggots?

Yes, yes we do. Hundreds of billions, even. 100% of Democrats support it.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukra ... SKBN20B0P9
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ukra ... -rcna79581
https://www.economist.com/europe/2023/0 ... eir-rights
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kyiv-drag-qu ... 10939.html

Speaking of military fags, check out Biden's favorite 4-star admiral (likely holds record for poop decks swabbed):
[ img ]

Finally, I'll just leave these here for the lulz...

What is Ukraine fighting for, besides Raytheon? Oh yeah, big banks. I seem to recall a certain TSHer hating on banks.
Citibank executive declares "we have to win this war" because there is such desire to "mobilize private capital" in Ukraine
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1647811834039136258

And this is fucking GOLD!
NYT military reporter David Philipps has rare moment of clarity:
[ img ]

I imagine he'll be fired/murdered soon...


But non-retard leftist Glenn Greenwald puts it best:
Literally every day, major media corporations (NYT, WPost, NBC, CNN) publish leaks of classified information from anonymous officials.

What's the difference between them and Jack Teixeira?

The media outlets are publishing what the Govt orders them say.

https://greenwald.locals.com/post/38470 ... tention-fr


Anyway, never forget: war is peace, you unwashed plebes. Give more money to Ukraine! :biglol
Muck FcDisney
 
Posts: 65408
Joined: June 20th, 2008, 12:18 am
Location: Scatlanta
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 346 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby FuckESPNdotCOM » April 17th, 2023, 11:32 pm

Muck FcDisney wrote:Man, being a propagandist is just too easy these days.

The real story here is:
- The US inflated Russian casualties
- The US downplayed Ukrainian casualties
- Outlook not as rosy as propagandists told you
- Zelensky ordering attacks inside Russia
- Presence of US/NATO special forces in Ukraine
- US spying on top Ukraine officials and other allies...again (Obama was busted for this, of course)
- Ukraine attacking Belarus

All shocking, I know. :dog

1. If it's not shocking, why is it a real story? :thought
Propagandists initially used the tried and true lie (Russian disinformation) for the 1000th time prior to being exposed as liars again:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russia ... 023-04-07/

2. Both can be true. I can take a screenshot of the "top secret" box score of the UGA/TCU game and make it look like TCU won 65-7. Are you really saying Russians are above lying and distorting figures? :lolthumb

Also note the use of the word "likely," as in unconfirmed but believed or probable. Same with your pipeline and Taliban points. I find it highly unlikely that TCU would lose to Georgia 65-7, but that's what happened. But let's make fun of Biden because he's not clairvoyant and doesn't claim to be. :lolthumb

3. Regarding leakers and Obama catching more/most of them (just taking your word for it), it's almost as if it's easier to steal classified documents when they're computer files on computers on a worldwide network...

4. It's very different giving soldiers fighting in an actual war guns versus giving some insurrectionist Billy Bob a gun for when when he's bored of muddin' and goes into an impotent rage about his favorite politician losing or feels like shooting up a school or church.

5. Regarding the banker, even though Stalin was a villain, he wasn't wrong about needing to stop Hitler. It's just a shame that Stalin also benefited.

6. Leaking things like the "NSA is spying on everyone" is something the public needs to and should know. Leaking battle plan information and putting lives in danger is not the same.
FuckESPNdotCOM
 
Posts: 10665
Joined: November 28th, 2012, 6:53 pm
Location: Vengeance
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 144 times
Been thanked: 186 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby Muck FcDisney » April 18th, 2023, 1:41 pm

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:1. If it's not shocking, why is it a real story? :thought

Pretty simple. The information leaked is the real story, not the smearing of the person who leaked it. Finding out the government lied is never shocking.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:2. Both can be true.

I don't even see the most laughable propagandists claiming this is "Russian disinformation" anymore. The fact that this came from the US government kinda ruins that spin.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I can take a screenshot of the "top secret" box score of the UGA/TCU game and make it look like TCU won 65-7.

No one is even claiming that. Alterations made to the documents were meant to hide the source, not change the actual facts/data.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Are you really saying Russians are above lying and distorting figures? :lolthumb

Assuming you can read, why even ask such a stupid question?

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Also note the use of the word "likely," as in unconfirmed but believed or probable. Same with your pipeline and Taliban points. I find it highly unlikely that TCU would lose to Georgia 65-7, but that's what happened. But let's make fun of Biden because he's not clairvoyant and doesn't claim to be. :lolthumb

He said "highly unlikely" when everyone with a functioning brain knew it was highly likely. And only propagandists and people retarded enough to think Russia would blow up its own pipeline ever made such claims. It's like Biden saying it's highly unlikely the sun will come up tomorrow, and when it does, his apologists say "he's not clairvoyant! Duh!".

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:3. Regarding leakers and Obama catching more/most of them (just taking your word for it),

You have a fascinating ability to read one thing and interpret it as something else. The Obama administration didn't "catch" more, they prosecuted more. You expose the truth about Democrats, you get punished. Simple.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:it's almost as if it's easier to steal classified documents when they're computer files on computers on a worldwide network...

:facepalm You should really educate yourself on how top secret documents are handled (unless Hillary Clinton is handling them). Ever heard of a SCIF? C,mon, man!

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:4. It's very different giving soldiers fighting in an actual war guns versus giving some insurrectionist Billy Bob a gun for when when he's bored of muddin' and goes into an impotent rage about his favorite politician losing or feels like shooting up a school or church.

We are giving weapons to the most corrupt government in Europe. They are then giving them to (often untrained) Nazi fags, or possibly selling some of them to arms dealers. We don't know. Our government has repeatedly made it clear that we don't even want to know. Remember when all that Iraq money just disappeared? Same thing is happening here. And we know it. And we don't care.

By the way, where do I sign up to get those free government guns for Billy Bob insurrectionists? :ROFL2 And can you remind me how many shots were fired (not by the government) during that "insurrection"? :dunno

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:5. Regarding the banker, even though Stalin was a villain, he wasn't wrong about needing to stop Hitler. It's just a shame that Stalin also benefited.

You come up with some retarded-ass analogies, man.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:6. Leaking things like the "NSA is spying on everyone" is something the public needs to and should know. Leaking battle plan information and putting lives in danger is not the same.

This guy is certainly no Snowden, and there is no benefit in releasing some of the information he leaked. But like Snowden, he's just proving what people who were paying attention already knew. And like Snowden, he's being punished because the leaks make the establishment look bad. Nothing wrong with letting taxpayers know how their money is being spent laundered. But overall, you're ending on a high note. :up
Muck FcDisney
 
Posts: 65408
Joined: June 20th, 2008, 12:18 am
Location: Scatlanta
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 346 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: 2nd Amendment: You're not Snowden.

Postby FuckESPNdotCOM » April 28th, 2023, 2:44 pm

Muck FcDisney wrote:
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:1. If it's not shocking, why is it a real story? :thought

Pretty simple. The information leaked is the real story, not the smearing of the person who leaked it. Finding out the government lied is never shocking.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:2. Both can be true.

I don't even see the most laughable propagandists claiming this is "Russian disinformation" anymore. The fact that this came from the US government kinda ruins that spin.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I can take a screenshot of the "top secret" box score of the UGA/TCU game and make it look like TCU won 65-7.

No one is even claiming that. Alterations made to the documents were meant to hide the source, not change the actual facts/data.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Are you really saying Russians are above lying and distorting figures? :lolthumb

Assuming you can read, why even ask such a stupid question?

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Also note the use of the word "likely," as in unconfirmed but believed or probable. Same with your pipeline and Taliban points. I find it highly unlikely that TCU would lose to Georgia 65-7, but that's what happened. But let's make fun of Biden because he's not clairvoyant and doesn't claim to be. :lolthumb

He said "highly unlikely" when everyone with a functioning brain knew it was highly likely. And only propagandists and people retarded enough to think Russia would blow up its own pipeline ever made such claims. It's like Biden saying it's highly unlikely the sun will come up tomorrow, and when it does, his apologists say "he's not clairvoyant! Duh!".

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:3. Regarding leakers and Obama catching more/most of them (just taking your word for it),

You have a fascinating ability to read one thing and interpret it as something else. The Obama administration didn't "catch" more, they prosecuted more. You expose the truth about Democrats, you get punished. Simple.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:it's almost as if it's easier to steal classified documents when they're computer files on computers on a worldwide network...

:facepalm You should really educate yourself on how top secret documents are handled (unless Hillary Clinton is handling them). Ever heard of a SCIF? C,mon, man!

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:4. It's very different giving soldiers fighting in an actual war guns versus giving some insurrectionist Billy Bob a gun for when when he's bored of muddin' and goes into an impotent rage about his favorite politician losing or feels like shooting up a school or church.

We are giving weapons to the most corrupt government in Europe. They are then giving them to (often untrained) Nazi fags, or possibly selling some of them to arms dealers. We don't know. Our government has repeatedly made it clear that we don't even want to know. Remember when all that Iraq money just disappeared? Same thing is happening here. And we know it. And we don't care.

By the way, where do I sign up to get those free government guns for Billy Bob insurrectionists? :ROFL2 And can you remind me how many shots were fired (not by the government) during that "insurrection"? :dunno

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:5. Regarding the banker, even though Stalin was a villain, he wasn't wrong about needing to stop Hitler. It's just a shame that Stalin also benefited.

You come up with some retarded-ass analogies, man.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:6. Leaking things like the "NSA is spying on everyone" is something the public needs to and should know. Leaking battle plan information and putting lives in danger is not the same.

This guy is certainly no Snowden, and there is no benefit in releasing some of the information he leaked. But like Snowden, he's just proving what people who were paying attention already knew. And like Snowden, he's being punished because the leaks make the establishment look bad. Nothing wrong with letting taxpayers know how their money is being spent laundered. But overall, you're ending on a high note. :up


1-3. Right... The information leaked can be altered. I'm not talking about blurring a kitchen counter or backgrounds. You don't seem to understand what I'm saying.
The Guardian wrote:However, some material that has appeared on Russian channels appears to have been altered,
[ . . . ]
At least some of the material - as seems credible - may have been doctored for disinformation purposes.
[ . . . ]
While allies don't like being reminded that the US routinely spies on them, it will blow over.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... -documents

Muck FcDisney wrote:I don't even see the most laughable propagandists claiming this is "Russian disinformation" anymore. The fact that this came from the US government kinda ruins that spin.

Reuters wrote:A Ukrainian presidential official said on Friday that the leak contained a "very large amount of fictitious information" and looked like a Russian disinformation operation to sow doubts about Ukraine's planned counter-offensive.

...That's your source...

4. OK. I like how Proud Boys in Charlottesville and Dumptards in D.C. are mostly good people protesting but the George Floyd soy boys are bad. It's funny how that works, too.

5. I know that documents on a network are easier to access than physical originals. Maybe there are no network connections and every CIA secret is hand-delivered to a secure facility. At the end of the day, the more points of access, the more ways to extract it.

6. I didn't realize we were giving weapons to Moscow... at least not without prying them out of dead Ukrainian hands. Again with the Russian propganda Nazi nonsense. There are just as many if not more Nazis and skinheads in the US military, and I'm not about to call them Nazis, either. Yeah, there was no insurrection. They weren't trying to overturn the results to keep Dump in office. They were just out for a stroll assaulting Capitol Police and busting down doors. Totally peaceful.

7. I tried to make the analogy easy to follow.

8. I don't think you know what money laundering is. But yeah, taxes pay for government projects, including aid to foreign countries.
FuckESPNdotCOM
 
Posts: 10665
Joined: November 28th, 2012, 6:53 pm
Location: Vengeance
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 144 times
Been thanked: 186 times


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 382 guests

cron