FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Are you saying the "propaganda" supporting Ukraine is lies?
Some is, some isn't, most is impossible to know (fog of war). When was the last time we were involved in a war where there were no propagandist lies? Certainly not since the CIA was created.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:So you're of the opinion that Ukraine attacked first?
LOL, no. That would be retarded.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:What exactly do you think Ukraine and the USA wants with a war with Russia?
Profiteering on the backs of dead peasants. Poor Ukrainians die, rich Ukrainians and rich Americans profit. And keeping the corrupt pro-US puppet state (which replaced the corrupt pro-Russian puppet state*) in power. And the corrupt puppets in Ukraine want to keep their power, of course. Russia took about 16,000K square miles of territory in 2014, and Ukraine had virtually no support from the US. Russia took slightly more land in 2022-23, despite the US spending 150% of Russia's
entire military budget. Retard neocons: "Money well spent!" :lolthumb
*Before you say anything retarded, no, I didn't support the corrupt pro-Russian government. But replacing one corrupt puppet state with another did not benefit the Ukrainian people. The only thing that changed is which corrupt fuckers benefited and which innocent people suffered.
Not that any of the below have anything to do with Ukraine, but whatever... :jerkit
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Do you think the American Revolution was an unjust cause?
"A bunch of rich, white fucking males didn't want to pay their taxes!" :mad
...
:dog Of course I support that one. What do you think I am, a Democrat?
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:The Civil War?
Could have been resolved in a number of ways without war. The war being about slavery was the propaganda. The federal government didn't want to lose control of half of its land. It wanted to consolidate power. The Union cared as much about slaves as Democrats care about illegal immigrants.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:WW1?
US didn't need to get involved. Why did it? Propaganda.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:WW2?
US didn't need to get involved. Why did it? Propaganda.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Do you think Germany (and the USSR) didn't start WW2 in Europe?
I think they did. Side note: everyone should read Bloodlands.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:You can nutshell anything like that.
Lay off the drugs, Muck.
Never. But there aren't enough drugs in the world to make the US use of blatant propaganda (again) not obvious.