TikTok learned the age, location, interests of a 10 year old girl.

Served her a “Blackout Challenge” video, which encourages users to strangle themselves.

She did that with a purse strap & dies.

Court accepts all this as true & rules that § 230 shields TikTok from liability.

[ img ]

If you’re not paying for a product, it’s because you are the product. Brainwashing 101.

China controlling everyone

Trying to bring back natural selection to humans

ericberry14 wrote:Trying to bring back natural selection to humans

There's nothing wrong with Darwinism. I have no idea why Muck is pissed off. People sell guns with the express intent to end lives but he supports that stupid shit. :dunno

Just because someone sees John McClane drive a police car into a helicopter doesn't mean they're going to try it. :crazy

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

ericberry14 wrote:Trying to bring back natural selection to humans

There's nothing wrong with Darwinism. I have no idea why Muck is pissed off. People sell guns with the express intent to end lives but he supports that stupid shit. :dunno

Only if those guns are going to Ukrainians (including Nazis) and I have to pay for it. Oh wait, that's you!

I gotta give you credit though. I couldn't come up with these delusional leftist non-sequiturs if I tried. :dog

Muck FcDisney wrote:

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

ericberry14 wrote:Trying to bring back natural selection to humans

There's nothing wrong with Darwinism. I have no idea why Muck is pissed off. People sell guns with the express intent to end lives but he supports that stupid shit. :dunno

Only if those guns are going to Ukrainians (including Nazis) and I have to pay for it. Oh wait, that's you!

I gotta give you credit though. I couldn't come up with these delusional leftist non-sequiturs if I tried. :dog

It's a very different situation supplying arms to people who are actually being attacked, murdered, and having their lives ruined versus "Maybe someone'll rob me!" or "Maybe I just feel like killing something/someone today!" I mean punching people in the face is considering acceptable in a boxing ring. On the street without provocation, it's a crime. What kind of devastation could Russia cause if they didn't have guns? Sure, missiles, mortars, and drones would still be in play, but it's a lot harder and slower to capture, torture, and slaughter an entire family if they're not outgunned.

I still don't know why you're crying about idiots finding creative ways to kill themselves. To be stupid enough to try that? Nothing of value was lost.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:[I]t's a lot harder and slower to capture, torture, and slaughter an entire family if they're not outgunned.

Excellent pro-2A argument, sir! :clap

Muck FcDisney wrote:

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:[I]t's a lot harder and slower to capture, torture, and slaughter an entire family if they're not outgunned.

Excellent pro-2A argument, sir! :clap

Taking quotes out of context. In the context of war on your doorstep, I don't have a problem with guns being around. The issue is when we're at peace they have no business being in so many unstable and/or unskilled persons' hands. How many kids have an actual body count because of guns? School shootings are too damn common and it's fucking pathetic that Columbine seems to happen at least once a year now, if not many more times.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

Muck FcDisney wrote:

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:[I]t's a lot harder and slower to capture, torture, and slaughter an entire family if they're not outgunned.

Excellent pro-2A argument, sir! :clap

Taking quotes out of context. In the context of war on your doorstep, I don't have a problem with guns being around. The issue is when we're at peace they have no business being in so many unstable and/or unskilled persons' hands. How many kids have an actual body count because of guns? School shootings are too damn common and it's fucking pathetic that Columbine seems to happen at least once a year now, if not many more times.

That is true in any context. That was the point.