FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Do you read what you write? :biglol
I wrote none of the things in quotes below. Textbook strawman.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"DEMOCRATS want to shut down information harvesters
1. No one thinks either party wants to shut down information harvesters. :crazy
2. You have to provide ID for all sorts of things. Sane people are kind of used to it. Try going to Planned Parenthood for your free baby dismemberment without ID.
3. As I said, they want to shut down places that provide free diapers, formula, clothes, cribs, car seats, toys, bill assistance, healthcare assistance to poor, pregnant women.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:that want to prevent legal abortions from people who WANT abortions! False advertising is fine!
Yes, they offer to help women and give them another option. Much like Planned Parenthood encourages people who don't want abortions to have abortions.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Better to kill a potential mother and potential baby in a deadly pregnancy than to remove a fetus!"
I would never say that. Ectopic pregnancies are not viable. Most medical professionals do not even consider ectopic treatment to be an abortion at all.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"Better to have unwanted children growing up in Family Services and foster homes using taxpayer money than to NOT have unwanted children!
Make adoption easier.
We spend far more money on full grown parasites who have kids for that sweet gov't cash and sit around selling crack and collecting welfare checks. Unborn children have done nothing wrong. They don't choose to, nor do they deserve to be painfully dismembered because some piece of shit cum dumpster can't remember to use her free contraception.
But it's certainly interesting to watch a democrat oppose using taxpayer money on the less fortunate, so long as that person is not a verifiable piece of shit.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Also, why is there so much traffic? We need a culling."
You're getting a bit off topic in your desperate straw man argument now. We're gonna need to kill 3x as many babies as we currently are to keep up with the number of illegal immigrants (and drugs, and sex slaves) Democrats are encouraging to come across the border. Maybe Liz's next batshit crazy idea will involve requiring prospective mothers to meet minimum financial requirements or face forced abortions. You sound like you'd support that as well.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"Guns killing actual people is fine, you know, 2nd Amendment.
People kill people. It's illegal in most cases.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:But doctors removing pre-life parasites? That's just wrong!"
Still legal. And I only oppose 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions, like 72% and 87% of Americans, respectively.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/235469/tri ... views.aspxThe vast majority of babies are viable at 24 weeks, and 33 states still allow viable babies to be aborted. Calling viable human life "not actual people" and "parasites" is inhumane and disgusting.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:"Why are we printing more money?! It's not like the population is growing. Stupid inflation!"
Now you're way off topic. And I thought Biden's excuses for inflation were the dumbest possible. :dog Do you know anything about economics? Anything at all?
There is no correlation between money printing and population growth. Population is up just 10% over the last 15 years, while the money supply is up 300%.
We print money because the government wants to spend money it doesn't have.
When you increase the money supply, you decrease the value of money.
Thus, printing money is a hidden tax on everyone. A hidden tax that disproportionately affects the poor.
Supply chain issues and increased production costs have also contributed to inflation.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Yes, everyone knows Planned Parenthood (PP) can prevent rape.
Wat. You read this:
And came to the conclusion that PP failing to PREVENT rape was the issue? How is that even possible? The issue, obviously, is that in both cases PP failed to REPORT RAPES of 13 and 14 year old girls as required by state law. Jesus, dude. :facepalm
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I don't know why they have so much funding.
Nor do I.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Forcing a middle-schooler to have a baby is the right thing to do. God knows how she'll financially support a baby she never wanted, but think of the children... no, not the children bearing and "raising" children, the children of children!
No one is forcing middle schoolers to have babies.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:Gosh! Octomom is a hero for needlessly creating massive financial burdens not only on herself but on taxpayers.
:crazy
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:CPCs can't force anyone to do anything
Obviously.
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:but PP can.
What would you call holding someone down and performing an abortion after you are asked to to stop?
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:CPCs can just take all your information, sell it if they so choose, and tell you to wait to abort fetuses until it's illegal. :dog
You're implying someone will walk into a CPC looking for an abortion, the CPC will offer them financial assistance, that "birthing person" will choose to have an abortion anyway, and that the CPC will then sell ALL (lol) their information for profit. Cool. Let me know when that happens. :dog
FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:I hope you view onanism and menstruation as crimes because they're just about as much "killing babies" as legal abortions are. :lolthumb
If I were a leftist, I would strongly advise against retard-level memes such as this, but you do you! :lolthumb