Nah... It can't be true...

[FlatEarth]

Didn't see this coming. :roll:

http://fortune.com/2018/04/27/mission-t ... cientists/

[Muck FcDisney]

[ img ]

[Muck FcDisney]

"Space."

:biglol

Spoiler:

A schematic showing one module, lower left, and what the finished telescope might look like, with approximately 1,000 modules assembled together.
Sure, it sounds kind of far out: a modular space telescope, nearly 100 feet across, composed of individual units launched as ancillary payloads on space missions over a period of months and years, units that will navigate autonomously to a pre-determined point in space and self-assemble.

But “far out” is exactly what Dmitry Savransky ’04, M.Eng. ’05, assistant professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering, and 15 other scientists from across the U.S. have been asked to give NASA for Phase I of its 2018 NIAC (NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts) program.

“That’s what the NIAC program is,” said Savransky, who received his doctorate in 2011 from Princeton University. “You pitch these somewhat crazy-sounding ideas, but then try to back them up with a few initial calculations, and then it’s a nine-month project where you’re trying to answer feasibility questions.”

Mason Peck, Cornell associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering and former chief technology officer at NASA, thinks Savransky is on the right track with his NIAC proposal.

“As autonomous spacecraft become more common,” Peck said, “and as we continue to improve how we build very small spacecraft, it makes a lot of sense to ask Savransky’s question: Is it possible to build a space telescope that can see farther, and better, using only inexpensive small components that self-assemble in orbit?”

Phase I concepts cover a wide range of innovations selected for their potential to revolutionize future space exploration. Phase I awards, announced March 30, are valued at approximately $125,000 over nine months to support each scientist’s initial definition and analysis of concepts.

If these feasibility studies are successful, award recipients can apply for Phase II awards.

Dmitry Savransky
Dmitry Savransky
Savransky’s vision for his self-assembling space telescope is all about seeing deep into space to discover new extra-solar planets – planets outside our solar system, also known as exoplanets – and map the surfaces of those we’ve already seen.

This proposal, Savransky stated in his proposal, is in line with NASA priorities. Self-assembly provides a path, he believes, to the construction of a space telescope the size of which would be infeasible using current design and assembly techniques, such as those for the Hubble and James Webb (launching in 2020) telescopes. Those telescopes have primary mirrors, the instrument’s “eyes,” of 2.4 meters and 6.5 meters, respectively; Savransky’s would have a mirror in excess of 30 meters.

He readily admits that constructing a large-aperture telescope is “really hard” to do.

“James Webb is going to be the largest astrophysical observatory we’ve ever put in space, and it’s incredibly difficult,” he said. “So going up in scale, to 10 meters or 12 meters or potentially even 30 meters, it seems almost impossible to conceive how you would build those telescopes the same way we’ve been building them.”

His idea involves programming thousands of individual hexagon-shaped modules, each 1 meter across and topped with an edge-to-edge active (adjustable) mirror assembly. These would form the primary and secondary mirrors.

Launched as “payloads of opportunity” – hitching a ride on a NASA rocket – they would navigate to their destination using a deployable solar sail, which would then become a sunshield during telescope assembly.

Their destination is known as the Sun-Earth L2, or second Lagrange, point – a theoretical point in space where the combined gravitational forces of two large bodies (in this case, the sun and the Earth) equal the centrifugal force felt by a much smaller third body (the telescope). The interaction of the forces creates a point of equilibrium where a spacecraft or observatory can “park.”

Savransky is looking forward to the NIAC Orientation Meeting, June 5-6 in Washington, D.C., where he will get to meet with the other Phase I winners and talk about their ideas, which include a shape-shifting moon rover, a wing-flapping Mars explorer and a steam-powered autonomous ocean robot.

Peck, whose research has been supported by NIAC in the past, is excited by Savransky’s vision.

“If Professor Savransky proves the feasibility of creating a large space telescope from tiny pieces, he’ll change how we explore space,” Peck said. “We’ll be able to afford to see farther, and better than ever – maybe even to the surface of an extrasolar planet.”

http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2018/04 ... -telescope

[FlatEarth]

Visions and Futures!! Love the path our "space" program is taking. "We're going to go back" -- "Even though we can't"

Fucking losers are the biggest frauds in history and you ride their coattail because of your sexual attraction to :chewy

Shame... Fucking idiot. :facepalm

[JdPat04]

I don't care for Star Wars, next

[JdPat04]

[ img ]

[Muck FcDisney]

[ img ]

Possible answers:
1. It does, you've just been indoctrinated to see it as round.
2. Only low-res lighting technology was available back when they climbed up to mount it on the firmament.
3. It originally looked like the Star of David (thanks, Jew-masters), but the Muslims shot it with a cannon around 300 AD, creating a hole in the firmament. Luckily, God likes to read by candlelight right where the hole was formed.

But I don't want to speculate. We should wait for someone with a YouTube PhD to advise.

[FlatEarth]

Flat Earth is in your head. You can't debunk it and it's driving you nuts. You also can't prove any curvature exists and that's got you both sideways. :lol:

[Muck FcDisney]

Flat Earth is in your head. You can't debunk it and it's driving you nuts. You also can prove any curvature exists and that's got you both sideways. :lol:

As I've told you many times before, I don't even care. But as long as you keep starting tard threads, I will show up to laugh at them.

It's really going to suck for you when you realize 99% of flat earthers are just trolls, and the other 1% have sub-80 IQs. :dog

[FlatEarth]

If you don't care that you've been lied to about everything from day one, I feel sorry for you...

Also, how is a thread about the fraud known as NASA cancelling a mission to the moon a tard thread? :ays The fact that you're okay with them stealing billions of dollars from tax payers is pathetic. Fuck it though, right? You couldn't care less...

[Muck FcDisney]

If you don't care that you've been lied to about everything from day one, I feel sorry for you...

Please, don't feel sorry for me until I start clinging to every batshit crazy conspiracy theory I can find.

Also, how is a thread about the fraud known as NASA cancelling a mission to the moon a tard thread? :ays The fact that you're okay with them stealing billions of dollars from tax payers is pathetic. Fuck it though, right? You couldn't care less...

If NASA isn't going to the moon, funds won't be appropriated for NASA to go to the moon. Besides, I'm more concerned with entitlement spending(>50% of budget) than NASA (0.5% of budget).

[FlatEarth]

The heliocentric model is the most absolute conspiracy. It's never been proven, yet people take it as fact. Fucking shame how society cannot and will not think for themselves anymore. :surrender

[Muck FcDisney]

UPDATE!

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-expan ... re-science

[Muck FcDisney]

The heliocentric model is the most absolute conspiracy. It's never been proven, yet people take it as fact. Fucking shame how society cannot and will not think for themselves anymore. :surrender

"If you don't think exactly like me, you're clearly not thinking for yourself!"

Does anyone not see how retarded this is? Would anyone actually be stupid enough to fall for this bullshit? Well, besides a flat earther, that is... :ROFL2

[FlatEarth]

UPDATE!

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-expan ... re-science

Delay delay delay... Nothing to see here folks! We'll just keep pushing back everything like we have been for decades. :suicide

[FlatEarth]

The heliocentric model is the most absolute conspiracy. It's never been proven, yet people take it as fact. Fucking shame how society cannot and will not think for themselves anymore. :surrender

"If you don't think exactly like me, you're clearly not thinking for yourself!"

Does anyone not see how retarded this is? Would anyone actually be stupid enough to fall for this bullshit? Well, besides a flat earther, that is... :ROFL2

I'm not asking you think just like me. I'm simply pointing out facts and I'm dumbfounded that you lack the ability to think for yourself and understand the facts presented. The heliocentric model has never been proven. That is a fact. There is ZERO provable curvature and countless proofs of things being seen at impossible distances. Do you really feel like you need to keep the firm grasp on Star Wars so badly that you will lie to yourself before thinking for yourself? :roll: