Moderator: JdPat04
FSUKW wrote:Good thing we are a small board that doesn't grow its posters, because this stupid shit would surely scare any new recruits away.
On a side note, your trolling is tiresome.
I liked it better when you pretended to be rich and successful..... :2thumbs
FlatEarth wrote:FSUKW wrote:Good thing we are a small board that doesn't grow its posters, because this stupid shit would surely scare any new recruits away.
On a side note, your trolling is tiresome.
I liked it better when you pretended to be rich and successful..... :2thumbs
Yeah, I can see how my facts making you question your entire world beliefs could become tiresome.
You cannot explain how it's possible to see the Statue of Liberty from 60 miles away by ship.
Or Notre Dame’s Antwerp Spire, which stands 403 feet high from the foot of the tower with Strasburg measuring 468 feet above sea level. With the aid of a telescope, ships can be distinguished on the horizon and captains declare they can see the cathedral spire from an amazing 150 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, however, at that distance the spire should be an entire mile, 5,280 feet below the horizon!
But, but, but... Light refraction, right? :ROFL2
Think, folks. Use your mind.
FlatEarth wrote:[ img ]
It is often possible to see the Chicago skyline from sea-level 60 miles away across Lake Michigan. In 2015 photographer Joshua Nowicki photographed this portrait of the city, news channels quickly claimed his picture to be a “superior mirage,” an atmospheric anomaly caused by temperature inversion. While these certainly do occur, the skyline in question was facing right-side up and clearly seen unlike a hazy illusory mirage, and on a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference should be 2,400 feet below the horizon. Notice also there is no bend in the buildings, as they should be leaning away from the viewer, nor is there a curve to the left or right of Chicago’s skyline.
Muck FcDisney wrote:FlatEarth wrote:[ img ]
It is often possible to see the Chicago skyline from sea-level 60 miles away across Lake Michigan. In 2015 photographer Joshua Nowicki photographed this portrait of the city, news channels quickly claimed his picture to be a “superior mirage,” an atmospheric anomaly caused by temperature inversion. While these certainly do occur, the skyline in question was facing right-side up and clearly seen unlike a hazy illusory mirage, and on a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference should be 2,400 feet below the horizon. Notice also there is no bend in the buildings, as they should be leaning away from the viewer, nor is there a curve to the left or right of Chicago’s skyline.
You really should credit your sources, Mr. OurWayISTheHighway. ;)
Same guy, earlier this year.
View of Chicago, Illinois after sunset from Bridgman, Michigan. ~52 miles away . . . March 9, 2018.
500mm lens with 1.4x extender (posted image is cropped in) f/5.6, 25 seconds, ISO 100.
EDIT: pic not working. You'll have to go to his FB page an scroll down to 3/9. https://www.facebook.com/JoshuaNowickiPhotography/
WTF is going on here? Did Chicago sink into the lake?!? :shocker
Hey look! It's your boy again. Can you tell me what's going on here?
[ img ]
Still waiting on your Statue of Liberty pic... and you backing up your claim of 14' steel walls on the WTC... and your obit or funeral for Thomas "Crisis Actor" Dean Jr, age 24. :chatterbox :yawn
Muck FcDisney wrote:So... nothing, nothing, and nothing. Well, I guess I'm convinced! :ROFL2
FSUKW wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:So... nothing, nothing, and nothing. Well, I guess I'm convinced! :ROFL2
Silly Muck, his proof is regurgitated YouTube clips.
You must get your ass in a boat and prove your theory in person.
FlatEarth wrote:You can't throw an aluminum plane wing through steel. No matter how fast it's moving.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 170 guests