I found this gem after seeing this video in the recommended section. Note Aubie's question being featured in the video.

The following comment is an actual quote by an actual Trump supporter... one that can figure out how to move single files, but moving folders is a bit too challenging without outside help.

Leathur Rokk wrote:Leathur Rokk 2 months ago (edited)
I was hoping to learn how to transfer my entire My Documents and Pictures and Downloads folders onto my new 64 GB cheapo made in China but cute,flash drive.I know how to transfer individual items, from you ,from this video,BUT how to transfer the whole folders?I did it one time with a 32 GB Kingston,i filled that one up....but that was 4 months ago.my laptop seems to be dying,i really need to save my data

You might ask how I know she's a Trump supporter. Easy enough when you see her latest videos have either Trump in the title or Trump in the thumbnail.

Alas, TSH Trump-lovers, you are not alone. There are others as hopelessly stupid as you. #MadeAmericaDumbAgain

This is about the damn dumbest post I have ever seen on a message board to be honest.

1. 50 percent of the country voted for Trump so it is pretty obvious there will be quite a few dumb people that voted for him in that same with every single major party candidate in history.
2. This woman is like 50 plus years old, almost everyone I've met that age is horrible with computers
3. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Corine Brown, Hillary Clinton and half the idiots you would probably vote for probably couldn't even figure out how to move the individual file.

End of Argument right here

JdPat04 wrote:End of Argument right here

Liberal Logic: If you talk louder and give no one the opportunity to speak then you win the argument even if the facts presented by you is completely wrong.

:thought

Hmm... does this rate as Sarah "Everything's a swastika!" Silverman dumb, Maxine "Russia is invading North Korea!" Waters dumb, or Nancy "I don't know who is President" Pelosi dumb?

As humiliating to the entire human race as the idiots above may be, they come nowhere close to your typical SJW triggered snowflake levels of stupidity. :no

I will take a computer retard over a rioting piece of shit that has been programmed by facebook / Obama / Hillary any day.

Your side has millions of them.

CraigKressel wrote:1. 50 percent of the country voted for Trump so it is pretty obvious there will be quite a few dumb people that voted for him in that same with every single major party candidate in history.

He didn't even garner 50% of the popular vote, which doesn't include 100% of the country. Epic :fail. She's not the exception, either; she's the norm for Trump-lovers like you.

2. This woman is like 50 plus years old, almost everyone I've met that age is horrible with computers

Not really, unless you hang around retards (which are probably the only people who could stomach your idiocy long-term). 50 years old would mean the dumbass were starting their professional life around the 1980s, when PCs burst onto the scene and you actually needed a brain to use one. Unless you're homeless or Amish, you use a computer now. It's not even something "complex" like sending an email. She can't figure out how to copy a folder. Even resistant-to-change conservatives who are predisposed to smash technology that terk er jerbs use computer devices now (mobile or desktop).

3. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Corine Brown, Hillary Clinton and half the idiots you would probably vote for probably couldn't even figure out how to move the individual file.

No.

Truth hurts. :dgb

Muck FcDisney wrote::thought

Hmm... does this rate as Sarah "Everything's a swastika!" Silverman dumb, Maxine "Russia is invading North Korea!" Waters dumb, or Nancy "I don't know who is President" Pelosi dumb?

As humiliating to the entire human race as the idiots above may be, they come nowhere close to your typical SJW triggered snowflake levels of stupidity. :no

I've never seen a snowflake who needed help figuring out the immense leap of complexity of moving folders from moving files.

Just shows how fucking dumb you are that you would vote for Nancy Pelosi

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

Muck FcDisney wrote::thought

Hmm... does this rate as Sarah "Everything's a swastika!" Silverman dumb, Maxine "Russia is invading North Korea!" Waters dumb, or Nancy "I don't know who is President" Pelosi dumb?

As humiliating to the entire human race as the idiots above may be, they come nowhere close to your typical SJW triggered snowflake levels of stupidity. :no

I've never seen a snowflake who needed help figuring out the immense leap of complexity of moving folders from moving files.

Pelosi, Reid, Cummings and brown

(Holy shit that even sounds like the worst group of lawyers ever)

Would most likely have the hardest time with those simple functions. Without their aides they'd be locked in a closet and die

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:1. 50 percent of the country voted for Trump so it is pretty obvious there will be quite a few dumb people that voted for him in that same with every single major party candidate in history.

He didn't even garner 50% of the popular vote, which doesn't include 100% of the country. Epic :fail. She's not the exception, either; she's the norm for Trump-lovers like you.

2. This woman is like 50 plus years old, almost everyone I've met that age is horrible with computers

Not really, unless you hang around retards (which are probably the only people who could stomach your idiocy long-term). 50 years old would mean the dumbass were starting their professional life around the 1980s, when PCs burst onto the scene and you actually needed a brain to use one. Unless you're homeless or Amish, you use a computer now. It's not even something "complex" like sending an email. She can't figure out how to copy a folder. Even resistant-to-change conservatives who are predisposed to smash technology that terk er jerbs use computer devices now (mobile or desktop).

3. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Corine Brown, Hillary Clinton and half the idiots you would probably vote for probably couldn't even figure out how to move the individual file.

No.

Truth hurts. :dgb

Do you not understand how the election process works and why this tired argument of "less than 50% of the popular vote" only proves you are a great parrot?

Lets say we had a world government and the countries now were states. Without an electoral college every candidate that won India and China would automatically be president.

Lets say 90 percent of China and India voted for 1 candidate and 60 percent of all the other countries voted for the other. The China India guy would win even though all the other countries picked the other guy.

Ill just let Tomi have at this one. :D

I've got one she can have

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

Muck FcDisney wrote::thought

Hmm... does this rate as Sarah "Everything's a swastika!" Silverman dumb, Maxine "Russia is invading North Korea!" Waters dumb, or Nancy "I don't know who is President" Pelosi dumb?

As humiliating to the entire human race as the idiots above may be, they come nowhere close to your typical SJW triggered snowflake levels of stupidity. :no

I've never seen a snowflake who needed help figuring out the immense leap of complexity of moving folders from moving files.

LOL, a properly triggered snowflake can't even tie it's own shoes until it spends at least an hour with play doh, lavender, coloring books, and teddy bears.

Really though, how much time do you spend watching snowflakes attempt to move folders? :crazy

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:She's not the exception, either; she's the norm for Trump-lovers like you.

Purple hair is the norm for Trump supporters? :ROFL2 Man, someone needs to get out more...

Another moron Trump supporter who happens to be a flat-earth believer. I'm sure it's just a coincidence. #MadeAmericaDumbAgain
Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/kyr ... smsnnews11

Jezter13 wrote:Do you not understand how the election process works and why this tired argument of "less than 50% of the popular vote" only proves you are a great parrot?

I know how it works. I'm saying the system is flawed. And both major candidates got less that 50% of the popular vote, but Hillary Clinton got more.

Take the 1984 election. Mondale won a paltry 13 EC votes while Reagan won 525 (~2.42% to ~97.58%). The popular vote was 54 million to 38 million (59% to 41%, all figures with rounding). So because of bullshit "winner-take-all" EC logic, it looks like Mondale had next to 0 support when he actually had about 2/5 of the voters.

You're a fucking idiot if you don't see how the EC can misrepresent the popular vote that it's actually tied to. A candidate can win the EC with just over 1/3 of the popular vote. In basically a 2-party race, that means the other major candidate won almost TWICE the amount of votes as the EC winner. That doesn't strike you as stupid? If the popular vote means nothing, which dumbass conservatives seem to think, then why have a vote open to the general public at all?

But I'm sure you'd feel the same way if Hillary won the EC with millions more Americans voting for Trump.

FuckESPNdotCOM wrote:

Jezter13 wrote:Do you not understand how the election process works and why this tired argument of "less than 50% of the popular vote" only proves you are a great parrot?

I know how it works. I'm saying the system is flawed. And both major candidates got less that 50% of the popular vote, but Hillary Clinton got more.

Take the 1984 election. Mondale won a paltry 13 EC votes while Reagan won 525 (~2.42% to ~97.58%). The popular vote was 54 million to 38 million (59% to 41%, all figures with rounding). So because of bullshit "winner-take-all" EC logic, it looks like Mondale had next to 0 support when he actually had about 2/5 of the voters.

You're a fucking idiot if you don't see how the EC can misrepresent the popular vote that it's actually tied to. A candidate can win the EC with just over 1/3 of the popular vote. In basically a 2-party race, that means the other major candidate won almost TWICE the amount of votes as the EC winner. That doesn't strike you as stupid? If the popular vote means nothing, which dumbass conservatives seem to think, then why have a vote open to the general public at all?

But I'm sure you'd feel the same way if Hillary won the EC with millions more Americans voting for Trump.

The system is not flawed. This election is resounding proof of why it is necessary.

If we were to allow the system you want? We would never have to vote because New York and California would lead us every year as they have the most populous by far and their sheople vote 80+ % one way. That's the only reason the numbers are as skewed as they are for Shillary.

The repugnicans in that state don't bother coming out to vote and a lot of the democunts don't have to either because they know their state cannot lose that vote. Same with Cali.

Electrical college, though that group is probably not needed anymore in terms of casting their votes for the elected, is needed because we are separate states that are picking a representative for us all and to be the deciding factor for federal umbrella policy. I sure as shit would hate if my voice was completely useless in a election.

This guarantees that we cannot be royally screwed into a monarchy and or into a dictatorship via one of two states.

Get out of the fetal position, remove your lips from your asshole and stop crying because your beloved piece of shit tyrant of a cunt lost an election. Again.

But to get back to the point of total votes? Had all the people in states like Oregon, California, New York, Washington etc felt the need to vote because it would have made a difference? Had Trump gone to those states thinking he could turn some people around? And of we could eliminate the illegal votes? It would have been a landslide in Trumps favor

But! Just as with your whining about how unfair it is your cunt lost? It is unfair that you feel we should be controlled by a few states as opposed to the population of the whole 50.