Moderator: JdPat04
ericberry14 wrote:Yeah black people suck
JdPat04 wrote:I think Michelle is an uppity bitch but nothing to do with that link.
That link is nothing.
It says one person says she left in controversy and one person says she didn't
It says they complimented all her work but says she was too controversial and a weak manager.
So truly there is nothing there to blame Michelle except one anonymous quote, and it's cancelled out by the other quote.
It makes the florist look worse IMO, and I thought maybe she had been a longtime florist like 15+ years but she's only been there for obamas term so not as big a deal, unless something else comes out.
:sorry but nothing there
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:I think Michelle is an uppity bitch but nothing to do with that link.
That link is nothing.
It says one person says she left in controversy and one person says she didn't
It says they complimented all her work but says she was too controversial and a weak manager.
So truly there is nothing there to blame Michelle except one anonymous quote, and it's cancelled out by the other quote.
It makes the florist look worse IMO, and I thought maybe she had been a longtime florist like 15+ years but she's only been there for obamas term so not as big a deal, unless something else comes out.
:sorry but nothing there
Who are you and what did you do with JD? :toetap
JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:I think Michelle is an uppity bitch but nothing to do with that link.
That link is nothing.
It says one person says she left in controversy and one person says she didn't
It says they complimented all her work but says she was too controversial and a weak manager.
So truly there is nothing there to blame Michelle except one anonymous quote, and it's cancelled out by the other quote.
It makes the florist look worse IMO, and I thought maybe she had been a longtime florist like 15+ years but she's only been there for obamas term so not as big a deal, unless something else comes out.
:sorry but nothing there
Who are you and what did you do with JD? :toetap
This is a link from Fox News. That's who I will trust more out of the major cable news outlets and the other 3 democratic news outlets. So as you can see if this was posted from Fox News and this is all they have they don't have anything.
I am truly reasonable and can debate anything. I have conservative and libertarian beliefs on things.
I love to argue, debate. I will even argue against my beliefs if there is a valid argument as above. So there is nothing that shocking to me.
However for me to be able to debate someone reasonably I have to have someone willing to debate me reasonably as well. Not trying to troll all the time.... ;)
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:I think Michelle is an uppity bitch but nothing to do with that link.
That link is nothing.
It says one person says she left in controversy and one person says she didn't
It says they complimented all her work but says she was too controversial and a weak manager.
So truly there is nothing there to blame Michelle except one anonymous quote, and it's cancelled out by the other quote.
It makes the florist look worse IMO, and I thought maybe she had been a longtime florist like 15+ years but she's only been there for obamas term so not as big a deal, unless something else comes out.
:sorry but nothing there
Who are you and what did you do with JD? :toetap
This is a link from Fox News. That's who I will trust more out of the major cable news outlets and the other 3 democratic news outlets. So as you can see if this was posted from Fox News and this is all they have they don't have anything.
I am truly reasonable and can debate anything. I have conservative and libertarian beliefs on things.
I love to argue, debate. I will even argue against my beliefs if there is a valid argument as above. So there is nothing that shocking to me.
However for me to be able to debate someone reasonably I have to have someone willing to debate me reasonably as well. Not trying to troll all the time.... ;)
The highlighted part above is part of the reason there can't be reasonable debate here, b/c the news outlet that you trust as your best source is one Lib's wouldn't trust in a thousand years. Granted, the vice versa is true for the Pubs so a stalemate is in place.
JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:I think Michelle is an uppity bitch but nothing to do with that link.
That link is nothing.
It says one person says she left in controversy and one person says she didn't
It says they complimented all her work but says she was too controversial and a weak manager.
So truly there is nothing there to blame Michelle except one anonymous quote, and it's cancelled out by the other quote.
It makes the florist look worse IMO, and I thought maybe she had been a longtime florist like 15+ years but she's only been there for obamas term so not as big a deal, unless something else comes out.
:sorry but nothing there
Who are you and what did you do with JD? :toetap
This is a link from Fox News. That's who I will trust more out of the major cable news outlets and the other 3 democratic news outlets. So as you can see if this was posted from Fox News and this is all they have they don't have anything.
I am truly reasonable and can debate anything. I have conservative and libertarian beliefs on things.
I love to argue, debate. I will even argue against my beliefs if there is a valid argument as above. So there is nothing that shocking to me.
However for me to be able to debate someone reasonably I have to have someone willing to debate me reasonably as well. Not trying to troll all the time.... ;)
The highlighted part above is part of the reason there can't be reasonable debate here, b/c the news outlet that you trust as your best source is one Lib's wouldn't trust in a thousand years. Granted, the vice versa is true for the Pubs so a stalemate is in place.
You didn't read that correctly.
I stated that's the tv news source I trust the most. I read news papers, and I check multiple websites about subjects. I don't rely on tv alone. I sure as fuck don't rely on a goddamn Facebook newsfeed either :justsayin
I'll google the topic and read about it from multiple sources. Independent, republican and some democratic leaning sites. I just stated fox was my tv source.
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:I think Michelle is an uppity bitch but nothing to do with that link.
That link is nothing.
It says one person says she left in controversy and one person says she didn't
It says they complimented all her work but says she was too controversial and a weak manager.
So truly there is nothing there to blame Michelle except one anonymous quote, and it's cancelled out by the other quote.
It makes the florist look worse IMO, and I thought maybe she had been a longtime florist like 15+ years but she's only been there for obamas term so not as big a deal, unless something else comes out.
:sorry but nothing there
Who are you and what did you do with JD? :toetap
This is a link from Fox News. That's who I will trust more out of the major cable news outlets and the other 3 democratic news outlets. So as you can see if this was posted from Fox News and this is all they have they don't have anything.
I am truly reasonable and can debate anything. I have conservative and libertarian beliefs on things.
I love to argue, debate. I will even argue against my beliefs if there is a valid argument as above. So there is nothing that shocking to me.
However for me to be able to debate someone reasonably I have to have someone willing to debate me reasonably as well. Not trying to troll all the time.... ;)
The highlighted part above is part of the reason there can't be reasonable debate here, b/c the news outlet that you trust as your best source is one Lib's wouldn't trust in a thousand years. Granted, the vice versa is true for the Pubs so a stalemate is in place.
You didn't read that correctly.
I stated that's the tv news source I trust the most. I read news papers, and I check multiple websites about subjects. I don't rely on tv alone. I sure as fuck don't rely on a goddamn Facebook newsfeed either :justsayin
I'll google the topic and read about it from multiple sources. Independent, republican and some democratic leaning sites. I just stated fox was my tv source.
Well you trust Fox and don't trust any of the other news channel that lean opposite your views, correct?
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:ericberry14 wrote:Yeah black people suck
:sadtroll
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:The admits/accepts to being hypocrites?
:ays
Calling a Dem or Rep a hypocrite holds little water b/c if you dig enough you'll get dirt on any of them being a hypocrite. So why bother?
Almost none of them are likable regardless of party affiliation imo.
JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:The admits/accepts to being hypocrites?
:ays
Calling a Dem or Rep a hypocrite holds little water b/c if you dig enough you'll get dirt on any of them being a hypocrite. So why bother?
Almost none of them are likable regardless of party affiliation imo.
1. Did I make a typo cuz I don't understand your first line? I'm being serious.
2. I'm calling the news outlets and the voters hypocrites. Yes both sides are about different issues and all politicians are.
My point is
The abc, nbc, cbs and cable news not named fox all praised Obama for being a young politician and you couldn't point out he didn't have any experience or they would attack you id you did. Here they are attacking Cruz for what they praised and defended Obama for. They are hypocrites.
Fox has criticized both for it.
The main stream media defended obamas heritage and they are now attacking Cruz for being part Cuban. Hypocrites.
The main stream media defended and wouldn't let you point out obamas past with controversial people.... Very many of them at that. People he admittedly said played pivotal roles in his life.
Here they are attacking Cruz's father who has said and believes in some crazy stuff.
Hypocrites.
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:The admits/accepts to being hypocrites?
:ays
Calling a Dem or Rep a hypocrite holds little water b/c if you dig enough you'll get dirt on any of them being a hypocrite. So why bother?
Almost none of them are likable regardless of party affiliation imo.
1. Did I make a typo cuz I don't understand your first line? I'm being serious.
2. I'm calling the news outlets and the voters hypocrites. Yes both sides are about different issues and all politicians are.
My point is
The abc, nbc, cbs and cable news not named fox all praised Obama for being a young politician and you couldn't point out he didn't have any experience or they would attack you id you did. Here they are attacking Cruz for what they praised and defended Obama for. They are hypocrites.
Fox has criticized both for it.
The main stream media defended obamas heritage and they are now attacking Cruz for being part Cuban. Hypocrites.
The main stream media defended and wouldn't let you point out obamas past with controversial people.... Very many of them at that. People he admittedly said played pivotal roles in his life.
Here they are attacking Cruz's father who has said and believes in some crazy stuff.
Hypocrites.
1. Insert 'Pubs'
2. Any/every politician new to the game takes hits for being a rookie, and each party backs up said rookie. Not noteworthy to me.
As for Cruz, he's being hit for his policy on US-Cuba relations, and his inability to actually speak Spanish :lol:
He's a white boy flying the Hispanic flag to gain votes.
JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:The admits/accepts to being hypocrites?
:ays
Calling a Dem or Rep a hypocrite holds little water b/c if you dig enough you'll get dirt on any of them being a hypocrite. So why bother?
Almost none of them are likable regardless of party affiliation imo.
1. Did I make a typo cuz I don't understand your first line? I'm being serious.
2. I'm calling the news outlets and the voters hypocrites. Yes both sides are about different issues and all politicians are.
My point is
The abc, nbc, cbs and cable news not named fox all praised Obama for being a young politician and you couldn't point out he didn't have any experience or they would attack you id you did. Here they are attacking Cruz for what they praised and defended Obama for. They are hypocrites.
Fox has criticized both for it.
The main stream media defended obamas heritage and they are now attacking Cruz for being part Cuban. Hypocrites.
The main stream media defended and wouldn't let you point out obamas past with controversial people.... Very many of them at that. People he admittedly said played pivotal roles in his life.
Here they are attacking Cruz's father who has said and believes in some crazy stuff.
Hypocrites.
1. Insert 'Pubs'
2. Any/every politician new to the game takes hits for being a rookie, and each party backs up said rookie. Not noteworthy to me.
As for Cruz, he's being hit for his policy on US-Cuba relations, and his inability to actually speak Spanish :lol:
He's a white boy flying the Hispanic flag to gain votes.
1. The admits/accepts to being hypocrites?
Insert pubs doesn't make sense to me still :dunno still not being sarcastic.
2. Again 2008 Obama was defended by abc, nbc, cbs, msnbc, cnn, etc... When criticized for being whatever he was before a senator and then being a senator for 2 years. A senator who wasn't put front like Cruz or Paul, or those types, but one who sat back and sometimes didn't even vote if I'm not mistaken. (Memory)
And no Cruz has been criticized on Fox by several people for not having paid his time. Everyone has said he hasn't been in long enough. They all said we criticized Obama for the same thing, so not holding Cruz to the same standards won't do. He's only been in for 2 years so far and now he's running.
So no not every republican does blindly defend him. I say the same thing. However we will say that he should get the same fair shot that Obama got, but he won't.
3. I don't even know all of his policies on Cuba but I've seen him criticized for non policy issues. I'm part Cherokee but I don't speak it :lolthumb
CraigKressel wrote:Not only does she look like King Kong's baby sister but she also must be a huge bitch.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03 ... irst-lady/
Also why does the White House have a fucking florist? What a waste of money.
Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:JdPat04 wrote:Y4NK33 PL4N3T wrote:The admits/accepts to being hypocrites?
:ays
Calling a Dem or Rep a hypocrite holds little water b/c if you dig enough you'll get dirt on any of them being a hypocrite. So why bother?
Almost none of them are likable regardless of party affiliation imo.
1. Did I make a typo cuz I don't understand your first line? I'm being serious.
2. I'm calling the news outlets and the voters hypocrites. Yes both sides are about different issues and all politicians are.
My point is
The abc, nbc, cbs and cable news not named fox all praised Obama for being a young politician and you couldn't point out he didn't have any experience or they would attack you id you did. Here they are attacking Cruz for what they praised and defended Obama for. They are hypocrites.
Fox has criticized both for it.
The main stream media defended obamas heritage and they are now attacking Cruz for being part Cuban. Hypocrites.
The main stream media defended and wouldn't let you point out obamas past with controversial people.... Very many of them at that. People he admittedly said played pivotal roles in his life.
Here they are attacking Cruz's father who has said and believes in some crazy stuff.
Hypocrites.
1. Insert 'Pubs'
2. Any/every politician new to the game takes hits for being a rookie, and each party backs up said rookie. Not noteworthy to me.
As for Cruz, he's being hit for his policy on US-Cuba relations, and his inability to actually speak Spanish :lol:
He's a white boy flying the Hispanic flag to gain votes.
1. The admits/accepts to being hypocrites?
Insert pubs doesn't make sense to me still :dunno still not being sarcastic.
2. Again 2008 Obama was defended by abc, nbc, cbs, msnbc, cnn, etc... When criticized for being whatever he was before a senator and then being a senator for 2 years. A senator who wasn't put front like Cruz or Paul, or those types, but one who sat back and sometimes didn't even vote if I'm not mistaken. (Memory)
And no Cruz has been criticized on Fox by several people for not having paid his time. Everyone has said he hasn't been in long enough. They all said we criticized Obama for the same thing, so not holding Cruz to the same standards won't do. He's only been in for 2 years so far and now he's running.
So no not every republican does blindly defend him. I say the same thing. However we will say that he should get the same fair shot that Obama got, but he won't.
3. I don't even know all of his policies on Cuba but I've seen him criticized for non policy issues. I'm part Cherokee but I don't speak it :lolthumb
1 The Pubs admit/accept to being hypocrites? *
Will get to the other 2 after I eat.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 493 guests